<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: New suit filed against high-speed rail	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/06/24/new-suit-filed-against-high-speed-rail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/06/24/new-suit-filed-against-high-speed-rail/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 20:51:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert S. Allen		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/06/24/new-suit-filed-against-high-speed-rail/#comment-86319</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert S. Allen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2014 03:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=65086#comment-86319</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Prop 1A in 2008 was entitled &quot;The Safe, Reliable High Speed Passenger Train Bond Act...&quot;

High Speed Rail to the San Francisco Bay Area , as planned along Caltrain, would be NEITHER SAFE NOR RELIABLE.  HSR needs secure - i.e., grade separated and fenced - track.  Caltrain has dozens of grade crossings and commuter stations.

HSR should initially end at San Jose, with seamless transfers there to Caltrain, Capitol Corridor, VTA Light Rail, and SV BART. 

Squander no more HSR money on a Caltrain &quot;Bookend&quot;!  This alternative is far better, safer, more reliable, and less costly.

Later up-grade the UP/Amtrak East Bay Mulford line from San Jose to Oakland and on to Sacramento.  From a new transfer station at the BART overhead in Oakland, San Francisco&#039;s downtown Embarcadero station is just 6 minutes away, with a train every 4 minutes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prop 1A in 2008 was entitled &#8220;The Safe, Reliable High Speed Passenger Train Bond Act&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>High Speed Rail to the San Francisco Bay Area , as planned along Caltrain, would be NEITHER SAFE NOR RELIABLE.  HSR needs secure &#8211; i.e., grade separated and fenced &#8211; track.  Caltrain has dozens of grade crossings and commuter stations.</p>
<p>HSR should initially end at San Jose, with seamless transfers there to Caltrain, Capitol Corridor, VTA Light Rail, and SV BART. </p>
<p>Squander no more HSR money on a Caltrain &#8220;Bookend&#8221;!  This alternative is far better, safer, more reliable, and less costly.</p>
<p>Later up-grade the UP/Amtrak East Bay Mulford line from San Jose to Oakland and on to Sacramento.  From a new transfer station at the BART overhead in Oakland, San Francisco&#8217;s downtown Embarcadero station is just 6 minutes away, with a train every 4 minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James Fujita		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/06/24/new-suit-filed-against-high-speed-rail/#comment-86293</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Fujita]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 22:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=65086#comment-86293</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This lawsuit is more about Altamont than anything else. You can tell by the fact that Flashman is involved.   Altamont wouldn&#039;t even be an issue except the NIMBYs of Silicon Valley hope to keep the trains out of their area.

The other issue is Tejon Pass; that issue should have been dead and buried ages ago.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This lawsuit is more about Altamont than anything else. You can tell by the fact that Flashman is involved.   Altamont wouldn&#8217;t even be an issue except the NIMBYs of Silicon Valley hope to keep the trains out of their area.</p>
<p>The other issue is Tejon Pass; that issue should have been dead and buried ages ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-14 07:55:44 by W3 Total Cache
-->