Comments on: Legislature passes first water storage bond in 50 years

By: Denial is a River in California: Can Oroville Spark New Dam Building? - Master Resource

Mon, 20 Mar 2017 15:57:46 +0000

[…] Proposition 1 in 2015 authorized bond financing for two new catchment dams, the Sites Reservoir and Temperance […]

By: Bill - San Jose

Bill - San Jose — Tue, 19 Aug 2014 03:54:02 +0000

The storage is significant because ……

IF WE HAD 30 RESERVOIRS, LAKE SHASTA WOULDN’T LOOK LIKE MY GUTTER!!

I hate when something so obvious is addressed as a new thought to the needs of this state by those who are supposed to represent us.

Power and water. It’s an easy combo to absorb, feelin’ me?

// and I agree with ECK on the way this gets spent before I give it a yes vote //

By: thetruth

thetruth — Sun, 17 Aug 2014 15:02:58 +0000

Eck, Check out Dino Cortopasssi most recent purchased opinions “Liar, Liar” in various newspapers, available online.
He is 77, a successful businessman, trying to warn people about the BS in Cal gov’t. The latest addresses water bond sleight of hand.

By: ECK

ECK — Sat, 16 Aug 2014 02:45:33 +0000

OK, a 7.5 billion bond. 2.7 for storage projects. Great! We sorely need more water storage as we’re flooded with immigrants – illegal and otherwise. And, OK, another .3 or so for conservation. So where’s the other 4.5 billion (60%) gonna go? I’m not voting for this until I see where exactly this is to be spent. On BS I suspect.