Chris-

Words have meaning– you or your ed. use them here incorrectly to support your VERY always obvious teabaggerous slants. That’s all– just calling attention to it.

Words have meaning and ANYone with any legal knowledge would agree that your headline is VERY misleading–intentionally or with a nice dash of ignorance delivered with confidence.

Your defense can’t be, “hey it’s just a headline, we got it right in the article”…….can it? Or are you still defending the “truth” of the headline?

Ted, I never once said it was a final ruling that can’t be revoked. It is the final ruling of the trial court. In fact, the post specifically talks about Jerry Brown’s decision on whether or not to appeal. The headline mentions a possible state appeal!

If you’re going to troll, please read what you’re trolling over.

But you win. I officially give up. I won’t react to you any more. Enjoy your daily workout.

LOL Chris– you DO like to think about Onan—-well……alot!

Hmmmm…….

“Duh”, is your best shot?

Oh my.

I, of course know well that you NEVER admit when you’re wrong, so no worries there.
“the judge…issued his final review…”

It’s not a final judgement, he merely “ruled”…..he is a lower court…..of course it’s not final and it is appealable…..but you kids are frothing to smear your tea baggy pov across most of the so called stories out here so whoever wrote the headline spurt “finalized” up there! LMAO

This “journalistic venture”, at times, looks like a jr. high paper.

Carry on little buddy!

“The funding of annual normal pension costs should be shared equally by employees and employers.”

This is from Brown’s pension reform blueprint in 2011:

1. Equal Sharing of Pension Costs: All Employees and Employers
While many public employees make some contribution to their retirement – state employees contribute at least 8 percent of their salaries – some make none. Their employers pay the full amount of the annual cost of their pension benefits. The funding of annual normal pension costs should be shared equally by employees and employers.

My plan will require that all new and current employees transition to a contribution level of at least 50 percent of the annual cost of their pension benefits. Given the different levels of employee contributions, the move to a contribution level of at least 50 percent will be phased in at a pace that takes into account current contribution levels, current contracts and the collective bargaining process.

Regardless of pacing, this change delivers real near-term savings to public employers, who will see their share of annual employee pension costs decline.

Also trying to figure out how political disagreements are related to masturbation.

“If it makes you feel good”?

And you wonder why I liken many of your posts to onanism.

This doesn’t add anything to the debate over public schools, tenure, etc.

But it makes you feel good. Congrats.

You have misused the word “finalized” in your story.

This purports to be a legal story and words in this context have meaning. It is merely his decision and of course fully appealable– not final.

I’ll let ya know when it’s final little buddy!