Comments on: Newsom reluctant to debate Nehring

By: LetitCollapse

LetitCollapse — Fri, 03 Oct 2014 16:45:52 +0000

In reply to SeeSaw. TV numbs the mind, seesaw. You'd be doing your brain a favor if you tossed your TV out the window. 75% of what you see there is propoganda. I know you worked in the gov for 40 years and have already been thoroughly indocrinated. At least your comments indicate that to me. So what you see on TV in all likelihood appears very factual to you. At your age getting rid of the TV probably wouldn't help much. So strike my initial suggestion. Go ahead and keep it. Carry on.

By: SeeSaw

SeeSaw — Fri, 03 Oct 2014 07:11:14 +0000

Of course, I’m sure you have been in North Korea–since you wouldn’t lower yourself to getting any information on life in that godforsaken place from TV.

By: LetitCollapse

LetitCollapse — Fri, 03 Oct 2014 06:30:14 +0000

In reply to SeeSaw. At least I have personal experience which gives me a standard of comparison when it comes to the American way of life, seesaw. You've got blinders on. Your information comes from the 6 o'clock news. Whatever Brian Williams tells you is gospel! :)

By: SeeSaw

SeeSaw — Fri, 03 Oct 2014 02:51:34 +0000

Well, going abroad certainly did you a lot of good didn’t it!

By: LetitCollapse

LetitCollapse — Fri, 03 Oct 2014 02:22:11 +0000

In reply to SeeSaw.

“I have never been out of the U.S. and I am not planning to either.”

And it shows. Trust me. It shows. 🙂

By: SeeSaw

SeeSaw — Fri, 03 Oct 2014 00:12:32 +0000

Knock it off LIC! You know darn well what I mean–I have never been out of the U.S. and I am not planning to either. I happen to love my country, which is more than one can say for you!

Of course, if there is a tight race and the public needs to vet all the candidates, debates should be held. I like them myself, but in these two cases it just gives the opponent an opportunity to embarrass themselves.

By: LetitCollapse

LetitCollapse — Thu, 02 Oct 2014 18:14:37 +0000

In reply to SeeSaw.

So let’s not have any debates at all, seesaw. Let’s just appoint little dictators who are not obliged in any way to stand before the public to justify their positions on critical matters that impact the daily lives of average citizens.

Based on the opinions I read from you I think you would be much happier in North Korea, as long as the gov would agree to mail your pension benefit there. 😀

By: SeeSaw

SeeSaw — Thu, 02 Oct 2014 16:40:04 +0000

The incumbent’s record stands on its own. We have already had a chance to see his strengths and weaknesses. Why should he spend the time and money to debate an opponent that does not have a chance? The recent debate between JB and Kashkari points out what a waste such a debate would be. Kashkari had no record to stand on, and he spent the whole hour pointing fingers at the “failings” of Brown and declaring that he should be ashamed of himself! Kaskari was the one who should have been ashamed! Nehring should stand in place, instead opening his mouth and showing the voters that he is just another fool like Kaskari.

By: Ulysses Uhaul

Ulysses Uhaul — Wed, 01 Oct 2014 06:30:54 +0000

There was a pugnacious, craggy boxer Carmen Basilio who was the underdog no one really wanted to fight……read up on this guy!

Times change…..we have presented to us quaffed, packaged, career politicos with nowhere to go but up…….alas…..but only one can be only an old heart beat away from running the California command economy.

Debate?

“What difference does it make”.

By: deanbean

deanbean — Wed, 01 Oct 2014 06:22:44 +0000

If you’ll take notice, Democrats don’t debate. They are afraid they’ll lose. They just lie about their opponents and spend a lot of money on ads about how their opponents want to take everything away while the Democrats take away your freedom and your property and your money and give you Socialism in its place. Pete Aguilar doesn’t debate either.