<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Hearings dissect Prop. 46 on medical malpractice	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:02:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: eric		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97340</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 23:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68661#comment-97340</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97307&quot;&gt;LetitCollapse&lt;/a&gt;.

Oh, you&#039;re just a complainer...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97307">LetitCollapse</a>.</p>
<p>Oh, you&#8217;re just a complainer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LetitCollapse		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97334</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LetitCollapse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 22:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68661#comment-97334</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97307&quot;&gt;LetitCollapse&lt;/a&gt;.

So they randomly test about 3000 cops a year and LAPD claims that they only catch 1 or 2 a year with dope in they systems? Let&#039;s see. That would work out to be .00033% to .00066% of those tested. You&#039;d probably find a higher percentage of dope users in a group of 3000 randomly tested nuns. hah. I&#039;m sure our fine boys in blue wouldn&#039;t design a testing program with built-in protections to back the badge, would they, Eric? I mean, we know they don&#039;t lie on the stand for each other, or lie to convict innocent people. So why would they design a dope testing program only for public show? Right? 

When medical doctors start carrying guns and can get away with shooting and killing citizens for &#039;reaching toward their waistbands&#039;, even when there was no gun found, then I&#039;ll support doctors being randomly tested for dope. But not a day sooner.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97307">LetitCollapse</a>.</p>
<p>So they randomly test about 3000 cops a year and LAPD claims that they only catch 1 or 2 a year with dope in they systems? Let&#8217;s see. That would work out to be .00033% to .00066% of those tested. You&#8217;d probably find a higher percentage of dope users in a group of 3000 randomly tested nuns. hah. I&#8217;m sure our fine boys in blue wouldn&#8217;t design a testing program with built-in protections to back the badge, would they, Eric? I mean, we know they don&#8217;t lie on the stand for each other, or lie to convict innocent people. So why would they design a dope testing program only for public show? Right? </p>
<p>When medical doctors start carrying guns and can get away with shooting and killing citizens for &#8216;reaching toward their waistbands&#8217;, even when there was no gun found, then I&#8217;ll support doctors being randomly tested for dope. But not a day sooner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97312</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 18:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68661#comment-97312</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97307&quot;&gt;LetitCollapse&lt;/a&gt;.

Here&#039;s a video talking about Los Angeles Police deparmtent being randomly drug tested. http://www.bakersfieldnow.com/news/local/How-does-random-drug-testing-work-for-LAPD-138614514.html?tab=video&#038;c=y]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97307">LetitCollapse</a>.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a video talking about Los Angeles Police deparmtent being randomly drug tested. <a href="http://www.bakersfieldnow.com/news/local/How-does-random-drug-testing-work-for-LAPD-138614514.html?tab=video&#038;c=y" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.bakersfieldnow.com/news/local/How-does-random-drug-testing-work-for-LAPD-138614514.html?tab=video&#038;c=y</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97309</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 18:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68661#comment-97309</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97307&quot;&gt;LetitCollapse&lt;/a&gt;.

Because I didn&#039;t have it at my fingertips.  Probationary firefighters are firefighters nonetheless. 

You DO realize that RANDOM means that someone&#039;s probably always going to be left out?  That doesn&#039;t mean it doesn&#039;t occur! LOL

This has nothing to do with the differences between people, it has to do with whether those people have influence over another person&#039;s life and health. 

The Medical Board of California itself came out with the numbers that 1 in 5 doctors will have a drug or alcohol problem during their career. Thing about it...look at the huge access to drugs and stress they have. Do you really want to risk being treated by a doctor under the influence????

Education has nothing to do with whether someone makes a stupid decision. 

I don&#039;t really care if you change your opinion.  Narrow-minded people like you are the minority.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97307">LetitCollapse</a>.</p>
<p>Because I didn&#8217;t have it at my fingertips.  Probationary firefighters are firefighters nonetheless. </p>
<p>You DO realize that RANDOM means that someone&#8217;s probably always going to be left out?  That doesn&#8217;t mean it doesn&#8217;t occur! LOL</p>
<p>This has nothing to do with the differences between people, it has to do with whether those people have influence over another person&#8217;s life and health. </p>
<p>The Medical Board of California itself came out with the numbers that 1 in 5 doctors will have a drug or alcohol problem during their career. Thing about it&#8230;look at the huge access to drugs and stress they have. Do you really want to risk being treated by a doctor under the influence????</p>
<p>Education has nothing to do with whether someone makes a stupid decision. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really care if you change your opinion.  Narrow-minded people like you are the minority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LetitCollapse		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97307</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LetitCollapse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 18:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68661#comment-97307</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97221&quot;&gt;Eric&lt;/a&gt;.

Why didn&#039;t you cite the actual LA Fire Department reg which allows random drug testing on firefighters? I think I know why. There isn&#039;t one. It only applies to PROBATIONARY FF&#039;s in their first year of active service. Not to the regular FF&#039;s who have completed their PROBATIONARY status. Best to provide full disclosure when discussing the issues on the CalWatchdog board, Eric.  

I was in the military for several years. I was not randomly tested even once. And I didn&#039;t know one military member who was randomly tested at that time. Some guy I knew got caught with some weed. They tested him and booted him out of the service. 

There is a world of difference between a PFC in the military and a medical doctor. If a medical doctor shows suspicious behavior consistent with that of a substance abuser then I have no problem forcing a test on him or her. But to randomly force medical doctors with over 11 years of higher education to pee into bottles is repulsive and IMO a civil liberties violation.

When ALL cops and fire fighters are subject to random drug testing we can discuss this again. Until then - I am FIRMLY against random drug testing on medical doctors. And nothing you say could change my opinion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97221">Eric</a>.</p>
<p>Why didn&#8217;t you cite the actual LA Fire Department reg which allows random drug testing on firefighters? I think I know why. There isn&#8217;t one. It only applies to PROBATIONARY FF&#8217;s in their first year of active service. Not to the regular FF&#8217;s who have completed their PROBATIONARY status. Best to provide full disclosure when discussing the issues on the CalWatchdog board, Eric.  </p>
<p>I was in the military for several years. I was not randomly tested even once. And I didn&#8217;t know one military member who was randomly tested at that time. Some guy I knew got caught with some weed. They tested him and booted him out of the service. </p>
<p>There is a world of difference between a PFC in the military and a medical doctor. If a medical doctor shows suspicious behavior consistent with that of a substance abuser then I have no problem forcing a test on him or her. But to randomly force medical doctors with over 11 years of higher education to pee into bottles is repulsive and IMO a civil liberties violation.</p>
<p>When ALL cops and fire fighters are subject to random drug testing we can discuss this again. Until then &#8211; I am FIRMLY against random drug testing on medical doctors. And nothing you say could change my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97221</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 03:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68661#comment-97221</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97212&quot;&gt;LetitCollapse&lt;/a&gt;.

Los Angeles Firefighters amongst many.  http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2620&#038;context=blscontracts Page 3

The military IS randomly drug tested. http://usmilitary.about.com/od/theorderlyroom/l/bldrugtests.htm, and http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=121345]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97212">LetitCollapse</a>.</p>
<p>Los Angeles Firefighters amongst many.  <a href="http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2620&#038;context=blscontracts" rel="nofollow ugc">http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2620&#038;context=blscontracts</a> Page 3</p>
<p>The military IS randomly drug tested. <a href="http://usmilitary.about.com/od/theorderlyroom/l/bldrugtests.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://usmilitary.about.com/od/theorderlyroom/l/bldrugtests.htm</a>, and <a href="http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=121345" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.defense.gov/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=121345</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LetitCollapse		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97212</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LetitCollapse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 02:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68661#comment-97212</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97145&quot;&gt;Eric&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;Firefighters are randomly drug tested as is our ENTIRE military.&quot;

Baloney. What FF&#039;s are randomly drug tested? Not in my area. Where do you live? 

I was in the military. Nobody I knew ever got randomly tested. They had dope dogs run through the barracks. But NEVER a random test. Only those caught with dope got tested. 

Oh, and if any occupation should be randomly tested it should be COPS! And cops aren&#039;t tested. Even after being involved in a shooting that results in a death. 

When cops gets tested you go ahead and test a medical doctors who has 2 pounds more brains than you&#039;re average cop has.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97145">Eric</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;Firefighters are randomly drug tested as is our ENTIRE military.&#8221;</p>
<p>Baloney. What FF&#8217;s are randomly drug tested? Not in my area. Where do you live? </p>
<p>I was in the military. Nobody I knew ever got randomly tested. They had dope dogs run through the barracks. But NEVER a random test. Only those caught with dope got tested. </p>
<p>Oh, and if any occupation should be randomly tested it should be COPS! And cops aren&#8217;t tested. Even after being involved in a shooting that results in a death. </p>
<p>When cops gets tested you go ahead and test a medical doctors who has 2 pounds more brains than you&#8217;re average cop has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97196</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 00:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68661#comment-97196</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97186&quot;&gt;Queeg&lt;/a&gt;.

First in line to what? Be drug tested? 

You bet....the MOMENT I&#039;m holding someone else&#039;s life in my hands, I&#039;ll be first in line to be drug tested.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97186">Queeg</a>.</p>
<p>First in line to what? Be drug tested? </p>
<p>You bet&#8230;.the MOMENT I&#8217;m holding someone else&#8217;s life in my hands, I&#8217;ll be first in line to be drug tested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Queeg		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97186</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Queeg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 23:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68661#comment-97186</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Comrade Eric....you are first in line?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comrade Eric&#8230;.you are first in line?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/01/hearings-dissect-prop-46-on-medical-malpractice/#comment-97145</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2014 15:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68661#comment-97145</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Firefighters are randomly drug tested as is our ENTIRE military. If it&#039;s good enough for our soldiers, it most assuredly is good enough for the doctors who hold our lives in their hands.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefighters are randomly drug tested as is our ENTIRE military. If it&#8217;s good enough for our soldiers, it most assuredly is good enough for the doctors who hold our lives in their hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-20 00:20:55 by W3 Total Cache
-->