<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Stockton ruling, like Vergara ruling, shakes CA status quo	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:58:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: T Mind of Ted Your God		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97612</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T Mind of Ted Your God]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68689#comment-97612</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97197&quot;&gt;T Mind of Ted Your God&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;ll miss the Poodle Girl.

The Ju Jitsu Walter Mitty life, the predictions which of course never came true, the hatred of others, the odd combination of arrogance and ignorance......]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97197">T Mind of Ted Your God</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll miss the Poodle Girl.</p>
<p>The Ju Jitsu Walter Mitty life, the predictions which of course never came true, the hatred of others, the odd combination of arrogance and ignorance&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Headed south		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97608</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Headed south]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2014 15:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68689#comment-97608</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97189&quot;&gt;Queeg&lt;/a&gt;.

Uhaul is hiring, pack and ship!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97189">Queeg</a>.</p>
<p>Uhaul is hiring, pack and ship!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97421</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 19:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68689#comment-97421</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97229&quot;&gt;Chris Reed&lt;/a&gt;.

Will that be a cloth or paper napkin? Just looking to clarify your response. And, dinner or lunch napkin size?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97229">Chris Reed</a>.</p>
<p>Will that be a cloth or paper napkin? Just looking to clarify your response. And, dinner or lunch napkin size?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tough Love		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97356</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tough Love]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 04:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68689#comment-97356</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97189&quot;&gt;Queeg&lt;/a&gt;.

Yes, the Public Sector workers did indeed follow the rules, but the RULES were stacked against the taxpayers because the Unions BOUGHT the favorable votes of our legislature.  AND, it&#039;s the WORKERS that are the financial beneficiaries of the Union/Legislator collision ..... so THAT&#039;S where the Taxpayers must look to right this wrong ... by very materially reducing the pensions of all CURRENT Public Sector workers (AND those already retired if dire financial circumstances so necessitate).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97189">Queeg</a>.</p>
<p>Yes, the Public Sector workers did indeed follow the rules, but the RULES were stacked against the taxpayers because the Unions BOUGHT the favorable votes of our legislature.  AND, it&#8217;s the WORKERS that are the financial beneficiaries of the Union/Legislator collision &#8230;.. so THAT&#8217;S where the Taxpayers must look to right this wrong &#8230; by very materially reducing the pensions of all CURRENT Public Sector workers (AND those already retired if dire financial circumstances so necessitate).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: T Mind of Ted Your God		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97293</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T Mind of Ted Your God]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 15:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68689#comment-97293</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97239&quot;&gt;LetitCollapse&lt;/a&gt;.

Lower court rulings are like DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN


zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97239">LetitCollapse</a>.</p>
<p>Lower court rulings are like DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN</p>
<p>zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rex the Wonder Dog!		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97245</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rex the Wonder Dog!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 07:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68689#comment-97245</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97233&quot;&gt;LetitCollapse&lt;/a&gt;.

Looks like my comment to Teddy never made it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97233">LetitCollapse</a>.</p>
<p>Looks like my comment to Teddy never made it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LetitCollapse		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97242</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LetitCollapse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 06:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68689#comment-97242</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97229&quot;&gt;Chris Reed&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;Why would a federal court say that with bankruptcy, federal laws don’t apply to California?&quot;

Why would the SCOTUS rule that the healthcare insurance mandate was a tax when the black-letter law itself stated that it wasn&#039;t a tax? 

They can massage the constitution and the laws to fix the outcome to their heart&#039;s desire. This has been done COUNTLESS times, Chris.  

For God sakes, if they can strip &#039;due process&#039; from American citizens and get away with it excluding California from Federal bankrupcy law would be like cutting butter with a red hot knife! 

We seem to have such short memories.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97229">Chris Reed</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;Why would a federal court say that with bankruptcy, federal laws don’t apply to California?&#8221;</p>
<p>Why would the SCOTUS rule that the healthcare insurance mandate was a tax when the black-letter law itself stated that it wasn&#8217;t a tax? </p>
<p>They can massage the constitution and the laws to fix the outcome to their heart&#8217;s desire. This has been done COUNTLESS times, Chris.  </p>
<p>For God sakes, if they can strip &#8216;due process&#8217; from American citizens and get away with it excluding California from Federal bankrupcy law would be like cutting butter with a red hot knife! </p>
<p>We seem to have such short memories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LetitCollapse		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97239</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LetitCollapse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 06:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68689#comment-97239</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I remember when everybody said that the crazy train was dead. lol. Remember when the lone judge ruled against it? lol.  

I warned all of you not to jump to conclusions too soon. And now it appears that there&#039;s a better chance that the crazy train stays on the tracks as oppose to being derailed. You need to understand. You don&#039;t decide what goes on in this society. The ruling class is the decision maker. You are just going along for the ride.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember when everybody said that the crazy train was dead. lol. Remember when the lone judge ruled against it? lol.  </p>
<p>I warned all of you not to jump to conclusions too soon. And now it appears that there&#8217;s a better chance that the crazy train stays on the tracks as oppose to being derailed. You need to understand. You don&#8217;t decide what goes on in this society. The ruling class is the decision maker. You are just going along for the ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LetitCollapse		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97235</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LetitCollapse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 06:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68689#comment-97235</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Education,pensions,can euthanasia as a cost control move be far behind?&quot;

What do you think ObamaCare is? They&#039;ve already taken benefits away from the Medicare population to pay for the huge upsurge of indigent Medicaid patients. And if you are over 55 and unfortunate enough to be enrolled in Medi-Cal if you have any assets to your name when you croak the State will swoop in to steal them before they pass on to your heirs. It&#039;s a form of elder abuse. If you are 53 and on Medi-Cal the State won&#039;t steal your assets. But if you are over 55 they will. And that&#039;s the law. Essentially, it&#039;s elder abuse.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Education,pensions,can euthanasia as a cost control move be far behind?&#8221;</p>
<p>What do you think ObamaCare is? They&#8217;ve already taken benefits away from the Medicare population to pay for the huge upsurge of indigent Medicaid patients. And if you are over 55 and unfortunate enough to be enrolled in Medi-Cal if you have any assets to your name when you croak the State will swoop in to steal them before they pass on to your heirs. It&#8217;s a form of elder abuse. If you are 53 and on Medi-Cal the State won&#8217;t steal your assets. But if you are over 55 they will. And that&#8217;s the law. Essentially, it&#8217;s elder abuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LetitCollapse		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97234</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LetitCollapse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2014 06:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68689#comment-97234</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97229&quot;&gt;Chris Reed&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;If the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals throws out this ruling, I will videotape myself eating a napkin and post it here.&quot;

And we&#039;ll hold you to that too, Chris. :)

Come on. There&#039;s been a crusade against public pensions since year 2000. Have you made any real progress to date? Nope. Even when public safety pays higher contributions to their pensions they simply raise their salaries and benefits so that it more than offsets the higher contributions to the pensions. So it&#039;s still a net loss for the taxpayers. You&#039;ve got both the politicians and the judges in the back pockets of the public unions. You&#039;re a smart guy, Chris. You know that.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/02/stockton-ruling-like-vergara-ruling-shakes-ca-status-quo/#comment-97229">Chris Reed</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;If the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals throws out this ruling, I will videotape myself eating a napkin and post it here.&#8221;</p>
<p>And we&#8217;ll hold you to that too, Chris. 🙂</p>
<p>Come on. There&#8217;s been a crusade against public pensions since year 2000. Have you made any real progress to date? Nope. Even when public safety pays higher contributions to their pensions they simply raise their salaries and benefits so that it more than offsets the higher contributions to the pensions. So it&#8217;s still a net loss for the taxpayers. You&#8217;ve got both the politicians and the judges in the back pockets of the public unions. You&#8217;re a smart guy, Chris. You know that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-17 16:34:22 by W3 Total Cache
-->