Comments on: Judge: CalPERS not protected in Stockton bankruptcy https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/judge-calpers-not-protected-in-stockton-bankruptcy/ Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:09:38 +0000 hourly 1 By: TGod of all LAW CWD edit https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/judge-calpers-not-protected-in-stockton-bankruptcy/#comment-97980 Fri, 10 Oct 2014 14:54:21 +0000 http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68970#comment-97980 You are welcome igacy– I hope that answered the question?

]]> By: jgacy https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/judge-calpers-not-protected-in-stockton-bankruptcy/#comment-97943 Fri, 10 Oct 2014 01:42:58 +0000 http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68970#comment-97943 I am not asking a court. I am asking you, Mr. Ted.
Would you he singing the praises of the opinion, if it supported the Calpers position? Thank-you for answering the question in the previous sentence.

]]> By: Rex the Wonder Dog! https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/judge-calpers-not-protected-in-stockton-bankruptcy/#comment-97938 Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:14:34 +0000 http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68970#comment-97938 In reply to TGod.

I’m not posting again until they ban you.

Or ban you from opining about the SCOTUS.

]]> By: bunkerqueen https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/judge-calpers-not-protected-in-stockton-bankruptcy/#comment-97934 Thu, 09 Oct 2014 23:17:03 +0000 http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68970#comment-97934 In reply to T Mind of Ted Your God.

Hi Tardsly!

]]> By: bunkerqueen https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/judge-calpers-not-protected-in-stockton-bankruptcy/#comment-97932 Thu, 09 Oct 2014 23:16:05 +0000 http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68970#comment-97932 In reply to T Mind of Ted Your God.

Hi TARDSLY!

]]> By: TGod https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/judge-calpers-not-protected-in-stockton-bankruptcy/#comment-97908 Thu, 09 Oct 2014 18:22:05 +0000 http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68970#comment-97908 In reply to Rex the Wonder Dog!.

LOL
Knew I could I force u back—- clown

]]> By: Rex the Wonder Dog! https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/judge-calpers-not-protected-in-stockton-bankruptcy/#comment-97905 Thu, 09 Oct 2014 18:00:58 +0000 http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68970#comment-97905 In reply to Tmind of your godhead Ted.

Ever since the very first case decided by our Supreme Court, Marbury v. Madison…

Thank you John Marshall Jr 😉

Please check the citation for Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)….yes the FIRST case of the SCOTUS started in the fifth volume at page 137, makes PERFECT sense to me …LOL.

]]> By: Tmind of your godhead Ted https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/judge-calpers-not-protected-in-stockton-bankruptcy/#comment-97891 Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:49:14 +0000 http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68970#comment-97891 In reply to Jgacy.

jgacy-

It’s difficult to answer your question because it is a hypothetical.

Ever since the very first case decided by our Supreme Court, Marbury v. Madison, courts are discouraged from answering hypothetical questions. So– in that spirit and with a profound love of not only Art 3, but the whole USC, I have to decline to answer that question.

]]> By: Ulysses Uhaul https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/judge-calpers-not-protected-in-stockton-bankruptcy/#comment-97888 Thu, 09 Oct 2014 15:07:10 +0000 http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68970#comment-97888 Cutting pensions for aged seniors sounds doomer-est….

Someday you may get your dumpster pass from your employer.

]]> By: Bill - San Jose https://calwatchdog.com/2014/10/08/judge-calpers-not-protected-in-stockton-bankruptcy/#comment-97887 Thu, 09 Oct 2014 14:02:33 +0000 http://calwatchdog.com/?p=68970#comment-97887 The pensions will be worth saving …… after the collapse, right?

Sooey!!

]]>