Comments on: Will severe school lunch policies eventually cost Dems? Maybe

By: Spurwing Plover

Spurwing Plover — Sat, 28 Nov 2015 16:29:24 +0000

Like that anti-beef freako Jeremy Rifkin and his whining that food that is fed to livestock should be fed to people instead well i live in a pretty well rural county(Ssiskiyou)and many cattle graze in the fields although some fed from the troughs and frankly someone needs to give this Rifkin idiot a big plate of grass at his next dinner party

By: Ulysses Uhaul

Ulysses Uhaul — Sun, 16 Nov 2014 16:07:04 +0000

Billy BooBoo

Fair and Balanced….goose steppers need challenged…this is not 1933, you know.

By: LetitCollapse

LetitCollapse — Sun, 16 Nov 2014 08:15:35 +0000

In reply to Bill Gore.

“Also-whats with this trend of ‘First Ladies’ taking over aspects of national policy?”

She’s positioning herself. Eventually she’s going to run for high office too, just like Hillary did. Michelle will ride Barrack’s coattails. What else could she do? Didn’t she lose her law license? This nation has become a joke. 😀

By: Bill Gore

Bill Gore — Sun, 16 Nov 2014 04:43:16 +0000

OK-back to nutrition and school lunches..
IMHO refined sugar is a VITAMIN next to aspartame/splenda. Our bodies can actually metabolize glucose, and our brains run on glucose and oxygen. Aspartame was discovered by accident as a DDT substitute. ‘Splenda’ is a form of chlorinated glucose. YUCK. Glucose/table sugar is NOT a problem if it is consumed IN MODERATION. Repeat: IN MODERATION. This means you are not an 800 lb COSTCO troll, looking for bargains on your scooter, gobbling down 100,000 calories a day in processed foods and sugar, so of course you are diabetic and your fingers are dropping off.
Also-whats with this trend of ‘First Ladies’ taking over aspects of national policy? I do not remember seeing Michelle Obama on the ballot, or Queen Hillary for that matter, so can she just go back to giving dinner parties for foreign dictators and tastefully redecorating the blue room?

By: Bill Gore

Bill Gore — Sun, 16 Nov 2014 04:31:53 +0000

In reply to Ulysses Uhaul.

So then… why are you here?
Are you and your fellow CWD trolls motivated by Rules for Radicals #4?
Do you think you are scoring points with Hillary Clinton and the DNC?

By: Ulysses Uhaul

Ulysses Uhaul — Sat, 15 Nov 2014 08:08:50 +0000

Ah ……just when it looked like we all could get along together.

No one takes these articles serious except tome scribes and masochist doomers…..

Who cares about pensions, BK cities and unions…..boring, tired, repetitive, exhausting, not healthy mentally.

Take a undeserved break for a long time….again……nothing changes. You’ll miss little.

I’m sure Donkey can carry on quite satisfactorily!

By: LetitCollapse

LetitCollapse — Sat, 15 Nov 2014 07:39:56 +0000

In reply to Ulysses Uhaul.

It’s not ‘sick’. It’s true. If it wasn’t you’d have the intestinal fortitude to point out a factual error. But you don’t. hah. But like a coward you only stand back and toss out insults. hah. I read you like a cheap paperback, Ahual!!!! 🙂

By: Ulysses Uhaul

Ulysses Uhaul — Sat, 15 Nov 2014 00:26:50 +0000

who in heck reads your stuff…..it is sick!

By: LetitCollapse

LetitCollapse — Fri, 14 Nov 2014 21:27:10 +0000

In reply to Ulysses Uhaul. "Yawn" means that he knows it's true and doesn't have a comeback. heh. ;)

By: Ulysses Uhaul

Ulysses Uhaul — Fri, 14 Nov 2014 03:22:18 +0000

Yawn.