<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Coal ban would boost tax cost of pensions	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 01:31:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Donkey		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106846</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donkey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 01:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=71634#comment-106846</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106062&quot;&gt;Donkey&lt;/a&gt;.

Oh no Skdog, the day I agree with you we will both be wrong!!  :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106062">Donkey</a>.</p>
<p>Oh no Skdog, the day I agree with you we will both be wrong!!  🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SkippingDog		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106182</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SkippingDog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 00:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=71634#comment-106182</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106062&quot;&gt;Donkey&lt;/a&gt;.

Nice that you agree with me for a change.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106062">Donkey</a>.</p>
<p>Nice that you agree with me for a change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Donkey		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106117</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donkey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2014 05:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=71634#comment-106117</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106062&quot;&gt;Donkey&lt;/a&gt;.

As to your other point on Opec not agreeing among themselves, just take a look the graph you provided. Some members and non-members have higher costs per barrel and are being hurt badly by the market glut.  :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106062">Donkey</a>.</p>
<p>As to your other point on Opec not agreeing among themselves, just take a look the graph you provided. Some members and non-members have higher costs per barrel and are being hurt badly by the market glut.  🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Donkey		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106116</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donkey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2014 05:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=71634#comment-106116</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106062&quot;&gt;Donkey&lt;/a&gt;.

Skdog, I put forth one of the reasons oil is being flooded on the market, there are probably others, i.e. the US is trying to destabilize Venezuela or Russia, maybe both, but rest assured many Opec members can not long survive the lowered price per barrel without major damage to their economies.  :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106062">Donkey</a>.</p>
<p>Skdog, I put forth one of the reasons oil is being flooded on the market, there are probably others, i.e. the US is trying to destabilize Venezuela or Russia, maybe both, but rest assured many Opec members can not long survive the lowered price per barrel without major damage to their economies.  🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Skippingdog		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106088</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skippingdog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 23:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=71634#comment-106088</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106085&quot;&gt;Bob Smith&lt;/a&gt;.

This is a story about coal.  Please try to stay on the subject.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106085">Bob Smith</a>.</p>
<p>This is a story about coal.  Please try to stay on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob Smith		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106085</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 22:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=71634#comment-106085</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106081&quot;&gt;SkippingDog&lt;/a&gt;.

CalPers over portfolio is risky. It&#039;s not just the coal stocks that matter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106081">SkippingDog</a>.</p>
<p>CalPers over portfolio is risky. It&#8217;s not just the coal stocks that matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SkippingDog		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106081</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SkippingDog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 20:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=71634#comment-106081</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106051&quot;&gt;Bob Smith&lt;/a&gt;.

$5 million out of an investment fund of over $300 billion?  Come on, Bob.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106051">Bob Smith</a>.</p>
<p>$5 million out of an investment fund of over $300 billion?  Come on, Bob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SkippingDog		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106080</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SkippingDog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 20:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=71634#comment-106080</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106062&quot;&gt;Donkey&lt;/a&gt;.

As usual, Donk, your explanation makes no sense.  OPEC doesn&#039;t do itself any favors with predatory pricing, since the technology to extract oil sands will continue to exist, regardless of its immediate economic utility.  The OPEC members are fighting among themselves about reductions in their production, but they can&#039;t individually afford to cut back that far.  Every OPEC member goes into net deficit when prices fall below $60 or so per barrel, with many having an even higher break-even point.

http://graphics.wsj.com/oil-producers-break-even-prices/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106062">Donkey</a>.</p>
<p>As usual, Donk, your explanation makes no sense.  OPEC doesn&#8217;t do itself any favors with predatory pricing, since the technology to extract oil sands will continue to exist, regardless of its immediate economic utility.  The OPEC members are fighting among themselves about reductions in their production, but they can&#8217;t individually afford to cut back that far.  Every OPEC member goes into net deficit when prices fall below $60 or so per barrel, with many having an even higher break-even point.</p>
<p><a href="http://graphics.wsj.com/oil-producers-break-even-prices/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://graphics.wsj.com/oil-producers-break-even-prices/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Donkey		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106062</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donkey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 14:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=71634#comment-106062</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106040&quot;&gt;SkippingDog&lt;/a&gt;.

Simple rational thought process Skdog, Opec is trying to undercut American production costs and thus close down many of the smaller private producers in the US. You don&#039;t seem to understand that the reason a barrel of oil is going down is because small producers have perfected the use of fracking and increased their production at little cost to themselves. Opec hates it, the eco-freaks hate it, and the fifth column RAGWUS feeders in government hate it too for some twisted reason I am sure, probably has to do with the lowered cost at the pump not translating into increased sales taxes.  :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106040">SkippingDog</a>.</p>
<p>Simple rational thought process Skdog, Opec is trying to undercut American production costs and thus close down many of the smaller private producers in the US. You don&#8217;t seem to understand that the reason a barrel of oil is going down is because small producers have perfected the use of fracking and increased their production at little cost to themselves. Opec hates it, the eco-freaks hate it, and the fifth column RAGWUS feeders in government hate it too for some twisted reason I am sure, probably has to do with the lowered cost at the pump not translating into increased sales taxes.  🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob Smith		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/12/19/coal-ban-would-boost-tax-cost-of-pensions/#comment-106051</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 10:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=71634#comment-106051</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why should CalPers care? If returns are too low the taxpayers make up the slack, if high they justifier further retroactive pension formula increases. That&#039;s why CalPers has such a relatively risky portfolio. Either way public pension recipients win.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why should CalPers care? If returns are too low the taxpayers make up the slack, if high they justifier further retroactive pension formula increases. That&#8217;s why CalPers has such a relatively risky portfolio. Either way public pension recipients win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-24 03:27:16 by W3 Total Cache
-->