LOL dysPHORic is back!

LMAO it just gets dumber out here!

well– what positions has anyone taken?

Nice to see Dyspeptic living up to his/her handle and pining for the return of Bruce Herschensohn – speaking of cadavers.

Who cares if she has a delightful personality. She’s wouldn’t be running for Prom Queen. That is not a relevant qualification for what is laughingly referred to as The Worlds Greatest Deliberative Body.

The problem here of course is that Sanchez could very well be the best viable candidate. She won’t win of course, because she’s not as politically connected in Crazyfornia as Harris, and she lives among the peons of So Cal, far away from the San Francisco-Sacramento nexus that runs the state.

We all know that, thanks to drone voters like the Demodrones who opine here, anyone with a D next to their name wins Boxers seat. A cadaver with a “D” tattooed to it’s forehead could win.

Either way, the end result will be another Senator who thinks The U.S. Constitution is something you wipe your posterior with. For the children, of course.

Ted, Dog & DVM: Good to see you’re all on board with Ms. Harris. But, for the moment, consider what issues there are, both domestically and on the foreign stage. What position on any issue have you ever heard Kamala take? I mean a serious position. And that includes California-based concerns; high-speed rail, immigration, taxation, etc.
I’d like to join her in her quest for the Senate seat, but I’m afraid she’s about to announce she wants to continue carrying the Boxer flag and that ain’t going to work.
I don’t believe she’s a visionary, a leader, an idea person with something exciting to call a her “platform.” I’m willing to hold out for now…it’s early.

I agree with u Skipper

I’m with Ted on this one: Harris is the best choice. However, Sanchez would be an excellent alternative.