S.F. Supervisors pass laws requiring health warnings on soda ads

by Josephine Djuhana | June 10, 2015 7:00 am

soda[1]On Tuesday, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors unanimously voted to pass legislation that would require posted advertisements for sodas and other beverages to include health warnings. Additional legislation bans the use of city funds to purchase sodas and sugar-sweetened beverages. The placement of ads for such beverages is also prohibited on city-owned property.

“Today, San Francisco has sent a clear message that we need to do more to protect our community’s health,” said[2] Supervisor Scott Wiener, in a prepared statement. “These health warnings will help provide people information they need to make informed decisions about what beverages they consume. Requiring health warnings on soda ads also makes clear that these drinks aren’t harmless – indeed, quite the opposite – and that the puppies, unicorns, and rainbows depicted in soda ads aren’t reality. These drinks are making people sick, and we need to make that clear to the public. All three pieces of legislation passed today will improve the health of our community.”

“This prohibition on advertisements for sugar sweetened beverages will align our city’s policies closer with our existing public health goals,” Supervisor Malia Cohen said in the same release. “Our residents, particularly our youth, deserve to be in an environment where residents are exposed to messages and advertisements that promote health, not harmful substances.”

The three ordinances and their requirements are detailed below:

The ordinances do not require warning labels on individual bottles or cans.

“The new warning label requirement on sugary drink ads does exactly what the beverage industry has long called for: provides consumers with education. Now, for every advertising message saying ‘live for now’ or ‘open happiness,’ consumers will also receive a science-based reminder that these products contribute to diabetes, obesity and tooth decay,” Dr. Harold Goldstein, executive director of California Center for Public Health Advocacy, said in a prepared statement.

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors previously passed[3] a resolution in support of Senate Bill 203, introduced by Senate Majority Leader Bill Monning, D-Carmel. SB203 would have made California “the first state to require health warning labels to be placed on sugary drinks, including sodas, sports drinks, and energy drinks.” The bill failed[4] to clear the Senate health committee and will be eligible for reconsideration on January 2016.

In 2014, The Field Poll released[5] survey results revealing “broad voter support for posting a health warning label on sodas and sugary drinks and taxing their sale to provide funds for school nutrition and physical activity programs.”

But opponents to the ban say it isn’t fair to penalize sugary drinks and advertising.

“It’s unfortunate the Board of Supervisors is choosing the politically expedient route of scapegoating instead of finding a genuine and comprehensive solution to the complex issues of obesity and diabetes,” Roger Salazar, a spokesman for CalBev, told[6] the AP.

“The beverage industry already provides consumer-friendly labels on the front of every can, bottle and pack we produce,” American Beverage Association vice president William Dermody wrote[7] in an email to NPR. “A misleading warning label that singles out one industry for complex health challenges will not change behaviors or educate people about healthy lifestyles.”

All three ordinances go into effect 30 days after the mayor has signed the legislation.

Endnotes:
  1. [Image]: http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/soda.jpg
  2. said: http://www.scottwiener.com/board_of_supervisors_legislation_to_combat_soda_advertising
  3. passed: http://www.sfbos.org/ftp/uploadedfiles/bdsupvrs/resolutions15/r0114-15.pdf
  4. failed: http://www.ibtimes.com/california-senate-fails-pass-soda-warning-label-bill-sb-203-1902706
  5. released: http://www.field.com/fieldpollonline/subscribers/Rls2461.pdf
  6. told: http://consumerist.com/2015/06/09/san-francisco-officials-considering-a-health-warning-on-ads-for-sodas-sugary-drinks/
  7. wrote: http://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2015/04/09/398526965/is-it-time-for-a-warning-label-on-sugar-loaded-drinks

Source URL: https://calwatchdog.com/2015/06/10/s-f-supervisors-pass-laws-requiring-health-warnings-on-soda-ads/