<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: CA renewable energy yield yo-yos, raises concern	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2015/07/06/plunge-ca-windpower-yield-raises-concerns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/07/06/plunge-ca-windpower-yield-raises-concerns/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 15:21:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Sean		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/07/06/plunge-ca-windpower-yield-raises-concerns/#comment-117231</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 15:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=81456#comment-117231</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2015/07/06/plunge-ca-windpower-yield-raises-concerns/#comment-117227&quot;&gt;Richard Rider&lt;/a&gt;.

Yes I agree it&#039;s expensive but the state has already decided to go down this path.  One of the recurring issues I&#039;ve read a lot about though is the &quot;duck curve&quot; that looks at generation from renewables during a normal day (peaking mid to late afternoon) and the demand from business and household use which peaks in demand in the early evening.  Since the state is already paying to pump water over mountain ranges, (water movement consumes 14% of the electric power in the state) it seems that expanded storage at or near the highest elevation would allow you to hold that potential energy and draw on it later in the day.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2015/07/06/plunge-ca-windpower-yield-raises-concerns/#comment-117227">Richard Rider</a>.</p>
<p>Yes I agree it&#8217;s expensive but the state has already decided to go down this path.  One of the recurring issues I&#8217;ve read a lot about though is the &#8220;duck curve&#8221; that looks at generation from renewables during a normal day (peaking mid to late afternoon) and the demand from business and household use which peaks in demand in the early evening.  Since the state is already paying to pump water over mountain ranges, (water movement consumes 14% of the electric power in the state) it seems that expanded storage at or near the highest elevation would allow you to hold that potential energy and draw on it later in the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Rider		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/07/06/plunge-ca-windpower-yield-raises-concerns/#comment-117227</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Rider]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 01:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=81456#comment-117227</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2015/07/06/plunge-ca-windpower-yield-raises-concerns/#comment-117223&quot;&gt;Sean&lt;/a&gt;.

Sean, while technically feasible, hydro storage works much better in the TVA which is heavily depending on uber-cheap hydro power which runs 24/7.  We don&#039;t have that option, as the renewable sources we increasingly depend on are VERY expensive and unreliable.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2015/07/06/plunge-ca-windpower-yield-raises-concerns/#comment-117223">Sean</a>.</p>
<p>Sean, while technically feasible, hydro storage works much better in the TVA which is heavily depending on uber-cheap hydro power which runs 24/7.  We don&#8217;t have that option, as the renewable sources we increasingly depend on are VERY expensive and unreliable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sean		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/07/06/plunge-ca-windpower-yield-raises-concerns/#comment-117223</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 17:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=81456#comment-117223</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What is remarkable is that there is little discussion of pumped hydro storage.  This is a technology that is feasible on an industrial grid scale and it currently used by the TVA and several places like Portugal which have high renewable penetration and the right geographic topography to have high elevation and low elevation water storage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is remarkable is that there is little discussion of pumped hydro storage.  This is a technology that is feasible on an industrial grid scale and it currently used by the TVA and several places like Portugal which have high renewable penetration and the right geographic topography to have high elevation and low elevation water storage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-19 13:49:36 by W3 Total Cache
-->