<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: CA&#8217;s road funding plans &#8216;stuck in traffic&#8217;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2015/07/26/still-no-plan-fix-cas-crumbling-roads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/07/26/still-no-plan-fix-cas-crumbling-roads/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:18:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Alz		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/07/26/still-no-plan-fix-cas-crumbling-roads/#comment-117540</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=81927#comment-117540</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One obvious needed change would be to open the contract bidding to ALL contractors - UNION OR NOT! That would instantly fix the problem. will that ever happen? NOT IN MY LIFETIME with these Democrat Whores!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One obvious needed change would be to open the contract bidding to ALL contractors &#8211; UNION OR NOT! That would instantly fix the problem. will that ever happen? NOT IN MY LIFETIME with these Democrat Whores!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: fletch92131		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/07/26/still-no-plan-fix-cas-crumbling-roads/#comment-117498</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fletch92131]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2015 01:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=81927#comment-117498</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The state needs to segregate those roads and bridges which can be outsourced to private industry for total maintenance, as is being done and in several states, including California. Tolls will be collected for use of these roadways (as it should be [the users pay]), and the decades-long contract has the winning bidder providing all maintenance on these roadways and bridges. That would help save a lot.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The state needs to segregate those roads and bridges which can be outsourced to private industry for total maintenance, as is being done and in several states, including California. Tolls will be collected for use of these roadways (as it should be [the users pay]), and the decades-long contract has the winning bidder providing all maintenance on these roadways and bridges. That would help save a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Rider		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/07/26/still-no-plan-fix-cas-crumbling-roads/#comment-117496</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Rider]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2015 23:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=81927#comment-117496</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So Governor Brown claimed early this year that fixing our infrastructure was a &quot;top priority.&quot;  Gosh, so why didn&#039;t he insist that the problem be addressed in the budget??  Isn&#039;t THAT the place such priorities should be set?

The fact is, the Governor and his legislators knowingly passed a fake &quot;balanced&quot; budget, leaving out road repairs. Then they come back RIGHT after the budget is passed (passed by the Democrats) to whine that they need mo&#039; money for roads.  No sale.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Governor Brown claimed early this year that fixing our infrastructure was a &#8220;top priority.&#8221;  Gosh, so why didn&#8217;t he insist that the problem be addressed in the budget??  Isn&#8217;t THAT the place such priorities should be set?</p>
<p>The fact is, the Governor and his legislators knowingly passed a fake &#8220;balanced&#8221; budget, leaving out road repairs. Then they come back RIGHT after the budget is passed (passed by the Democrats) to whine that they need mo&#8217; money for roads.  No sale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ronald Stein		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/07/26/still-no-plan-fix-cas-crumbling-roads/#comment-117487</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronald Stein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2015 16:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=81927#comment-117487</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Governor Brown is a great politician, but he is killing his huge budget and support for infrastructure with his crusade to support Senate Bill 350, the Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015. That will mandate a 50 percent reduction in oil usage by vehicles by 2030.

The reality is that Honda has opted to kill its Civic hybrid and CNG models. The death of the Civic hybrid and CNG are an acknowledgment of public disinterest in the alternative technologies. According to Karl Brauer of Kelley Blue Book, this is a “reflection of zero interest from American consumers in small, fuel-efficient cars — especially more expensive hybrid versions of small, fuel-efficient cars,&quot; &quot;This is in keeping with where the market is going, away from hybrids and toward smaller, more efficient internal combustion engines.&quot;

Moms will continue to drive their kids to school and soccer, workers still need to drive back and forth from work, hospitality workers still need to drive to work, fast food workers still need to drive to work, truckers still need to deliver the huge amount of containers that arrive in our ports to serve the needs of CA and the entire USA.

California’s 100,000 electric vehicles are the most electric vehicles in any state, however, the other 97% of California’s 30 million vehicles that DO NOT run on electricity or other alternative fuels are consuming more than 40 million gallons of transportation fuels, gasoline and diesel, excluding jet fuel, EVERY DAY.  Sounds like a lot of fuel, but it equates to just more than 1 gallon per day per vehicle. 

Even though there is a both projected growth in population from our current 38 million citizens, AND an increase in vehicle registrations from our current 30 million to more than 40 million vehicles, the fuel demand is projected to decline slightly from the current 40 million gallons per DAY of gasoline and diesel, mostly as a result of continuous improvements in fuel efficiencies, and a slight impact by the 3% of vehicles that run on electricity or other alternative fuels.

We already have AB32 and the LCFS in effect to control GHG emissions.  REQUIRING California’s 38 million citizens to change their lifestyle appears to be bad public policy and possibly unenforceable on abusers that do not reduce their usage by 50%.

Senate Bill 350, the Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015 that will mandate a 50 percent reduction in oil usage by vehicles by 2030 from the current 40 million gallons of transportation fuels down to 20 million a day in just 15 years would be a drastic lifestyle change to demobilize one of the world’s largest that is funding the huge California budget.  With more miles projected to be driven on California highways, there would be a significant reduction in transportation fuel tax revenue to fund the maintenance and repairs of the highway transportation systems.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Governor Brown is a great politician, but he is killing his huge budget and support for infrastructure with his crusade to support Senate Bill 350, the Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015. That will mandate a 50 percent reduction in oil usage by vehicles by 2030.</p>
<p>The reality is that Honda has opted to kill its Civic hybrid and CNG models. The death of the Civic hybrid and CNG are an acknowledgment of public disinterest in the alternative technologies. According to Karl Brauer of Kelley Blue Book, this is a “reflection of zero interest from American consumers in small, fuel-efficient cars — especially more expensive hybrid versions of small, fuel-efficient cars,&#8221; &#8220;This is in keeping with where the market is going, away from hybrids and toward smaller, more efficient internal combustion engines.&#8221;</p>
<p>Moms will continue to drive their kids to school and soccer, workers still need to drive back and forth from work, hospitality workers still need to drive to work, fast food workers still need to drive to work, truckers still need to deliver the huge amount of containers that arrive in our ports to serve the needs of CA and the entire USA.</p>
<p>California’s 100,000 electric vehicles are the most electric vehicles in any state, however, the other 97% of California’s 30 million vehicles that DO NOT run on electricity or other alternative fuels are consuming more than 40 million gallons of transportation fuels, gasoline and diesel, excluding jet fuel, EVERY DAY.  Sounds like a lot of fuel, but it equates to just more than 1 gallon per day per vehicle. </p>
<p>Even though there is a both projected growth in population from our current 38 million citizens, AND an increase in vehicle registrations from our current 30 million to more than 40 million vehicles, the fuel demand is projected to decline slightly from the current 40 million gallons per DAY of gasoline and diesel, mostly as a result of continuous improvements in fuel efficiencies, and a slight impact by the 3% of vehicles that run on electricity or other alternative fuels.</p>
<p>We already have AB32 and the LCFS in effect to control GHG emissions.  REQUIRING California’s 38 million citizens to change their lifestyle appears to be bad public policy and possibly unenforceable on abusers that do not reduce their usage by 50%.</p>
<p>Senate Bill 350, the Clean Energy and Pollution Reduction Act of 2015 that will mandate a 50 percent reduction in oil usage by vehicles by 2030 from the current 40 million gallons of transportation fuels down to 20 million a day in just 15 years would be a drastic lifestyle change to demobilize one of the world’s largest that is funding the huge California budget.  With more miles projected to be driven on California highways, there would be a significant reduction in transportation fuel tax revenue to fund the maintenance and repairs of the highway transportation systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-19 04:19:46 by W3 Total Cache
-->