<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: San Jose scraps pension reform measure	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 21:37:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Inzidious		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/#comment-117972</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Inzidious]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 21:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=82606#comment-117972</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/#comment-117848&quot;&gt;SkippingDog&lt;/a&gt;.

Dude really? You honestly believe retention bonuses are necessary? I rarely post comments on these articles because it always comes down to two things really: You&#039;re either a public sector worker and you think you deserve what you&#039;re getting, or you&#039;re not and it&#039;s ridiculous.

Everyone knows how impossible it is to get a government job in Cali. Everyone. Including all you existing govt workers who hire your siblings, cousins, etc etc. Nepotism is like 10 times hire in the public sector vs private. Hrmm I wonder why that is.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/#comment-117848">SkippingDog</a>.</p>
<p>Dude really? You honestly believe retention bonuses are necessary? I rarely post comments on these articles because it always comes down to two things really: You&#8217;re either a public sector worker and you think you deserve what you&#8217;re getting, or you&#8217;re not and it&#8217;s ridiculous.</p>
<p>Everyone knows how impossible it is to get a government job in Cali. Everyone. Including all you existing govt workers who hire your siblings, cousins, etc etc. Nepotism is like 10 times hire in the public sector vs private. Hrmm I wonder why that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: desmond		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/#comment-117881</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[desmond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 22:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=82606#comment-117881</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Has anyone talked to tourists from other countries? The perception is the cops here are paramilitary, corrupt, and too many are even a bit nuts. To all who defend, remember, it was politically smart to speak highly of the Stasi or SS in their day. It was also cowardly. Nice company our police keep.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone talked to tourists from other countries? The perception is the cops here are paramilitary, corrupt, and too many are even a bit nuts. To all who defend, remember, it was politically smart to speak highly of the Stasi or SS in their day. It was also cowardly. Nice company our police keep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SeeSaw		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/#comment-117879</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SeeSaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 16:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=82606#comment-117879</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/#comment-117878&quot;&gt;Rex the Wonder Dog!&lt;/a&gt;.

I didn&#039;t make it up.  It was announced by the UC President Jan Napolitano at a news conference, which I viewed on TV.   She said, &quot;If the parents total gross income is $80,000 or less, the student is eligible for free tuition at UC&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/#comment-117878">Rex the Wonder Dog!</a>.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t make it up.  It was announced by the UC President Jan Napolitano at a news conference, which I viewed on TV.   She said, &#8220;If the parents total gross income is $80,000 or less, the student is eligible for free tuition at UC&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rex the Wonder Dog!		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/#comment-117878</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rex the Wonder Dog!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 15:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=82606#comment-117878</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/#comment-117833&quot;&gt;SeeSaw&lt;/a&gt;.

Why are you wrong every single time seesaw???

http://admission.universityofcalifornia.edu/paying-for-uc/tuition-and-cost/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/#comment-117833">SeeSaw</a>.</p>
<p>Why are you wrong every single time seesaw???</p>
<p><a href="http://admission.universityofcalifornia.edu/paying-for-uc/tuition-and-cost/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://admission.universityofcalifornia.edu/paying-for-uc/tuition-and-cost/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ulysses Uhaul		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/#comment-117874</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ulysses Uhaul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2015 05:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=82606#comment-117874</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/#comment-117872&quot;&gt;Rex the Wonder Dog!&lt;/a&gt;.

97% of the residents can run a corn dog mustarding station at Poodle&#039;s Adelanto truck stop employee location.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/#comment-117872">Rex the Wonder Dog!</a>.</p>
<p>97% of the residents can run a corn dog mustarding station at Poodle&#8217;s Adelanto truck stop employee location.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rex the Wonder Dog!		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/#comment-117872</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rex the Wonder Dog!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 23:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=82606#comment-117872</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Cop is a GED job, always has been, always will be.

80% of the population could do it, if given the chance.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cop is a GED job, always has been, always will be.</p>
<p>80% of the population could do it, if given the chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted S		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/#comment-117857</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 05:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=82606#comment-117857</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/#comment-117853&quot;&gt;DavidfromLosGatos&lt;/a&gt;.

Well said David]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/#comment-117853">DavidfromLosGatos</a>.</p>
<p>Well said David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DavidfromLosGatos		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/#comment-117853</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DavidfromLosGatos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 21:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=82606#comment-117853</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the meantime, the city is saving the $200K (or whatever the full cost of each &quot;sworn officer&quot; is) per year per vacancy. &quot;943 sworn officers out of a budgeted 1,109 positions&quot; = 166 vacancies. That is some big time savings to help offset the increases as they are slowly hired back.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the meantime, the city is saving the $200K (or whatever the full cost of each &#8220;sworn officer&#8221; is) per year per vacancy. &#8220;943 sworn officers out of a budgeted 1,109 positions&#8221; = 166 vacancies. That is some big time savings to help offset the increases as they are slowly hired back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SkippingDog		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/#comment-117848</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SkippingDog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 17:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=82606#comment-117848</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/#comment-117845&quot;&gt;ricky65&lt;/a&gt;.

If market forces weren&#039;t in play, SJ would not have needed to provide retention bonuses, much less provide substantial bonus payments to those officers who agree to return after leaving for other departments.

The number of overall applicants for police and fire positions is irrelevant, since the vast majority of those are quickly found to be unqualified due to lack of education, experience, or criminal acts and affiliations.  2-3% success rate for applicants is the norm, and many applicant groups are much thinner.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/#comment-117845">ricky65</a>.</p>
<p>If market forces weren&#8217;t in play, SJ would not have needed to provide retention bonuses, much less provide substantial bonus payments to those officers who agree to return after leaving for other departments.</p>
<p>The number of overall applicants for police and fire positions is irrelevant, since the vast majority of those are quickly found to be unqualified due to lack of education, experience, or criminal acts and affiliations.  2-3% success rate for applicants is the norm, and many applicant groups are much thinner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ted		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/08/20/san-jose-scraps-measure-b/#comment-117847</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ted]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=82606#comment-117847</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Problem with these measures of course is that they all contain clearly unlawful provisions and they drop the bottom out of the funds   Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz  trying to fix what aint broken!  lmao

the ted system]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Problem with these measures of course is that they all contain clearly unlawful provisions and they drop the bottom out of the funds   Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz  trying to fix what aint broken!  lmao</p>
<p>the ted system</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-14 07:19:21 by W3 Total Cache
-->