Comments on: Gov. Brown vetoes CA drone bill

By: ricky 65

ricky 65 — Fri, 18 Sep 2015 03:15:38 +0000

Of course Brownie would veto any ban on drones.
Since at least 50% of his party is comprised of tax eating, indolent, welfare drones it would be devastating to the D-Rat voter base.

By: spurwing Plover

spurwing Plover — Thu, 17 Sep 2015 19:38:10 +0000

The Moonbeam cocktail 4 parts Stupid mixed with 3 parts Big Brotherism

By: Queeg

Queeg — Wed, 16 Sep 2015 23:06:47 +0000

Comrades

Commercial drones flying over private property is a “taking”. They make the globalist profits you get the noise, fear noise intrusions and accident damage. Wake up!

There is nothing good for you coming from thousands of these invaders encroaching on your property privacy.

By: Nancy Keeler

Nancy Keeler — Tue, 15 Sep 2015 19:55:59 +0000

I thought “burdensome litigation and new causes of action” was what Jerry Brown excelled in.

By: Richard Rider

Richard Rider — Tue, 15 Sep 2015 17:13:19 +0000

Given the current nanny nature of CA government, it’s likely that — if the car or the airplane were invented today — both would be banned (or regulated out of existence) in California. And this would be done for an endless number of perfectly rational reasons.

Think about it. Thousands WOULD die if cars were allowed. Planes could fall out of the sky and kill people on the ground. Better that we not allow such change. As I said — perfectly rational reasons.

By: spurwing Plover

spurwing Plover — Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:03:14 +0000

Oh yes Moonbeam needs his spies in the sky I wonder how many pathetic fools who voted for him are wanting too kick themselves for being so stupid