More empty babble.

Is Teddy posting again???!!!

What is wrong with expensive fast food ?????

A higher minimum wage prices food to the moon…..and the plutocrats will blame doomers ……..the Visigoths will arise to pluck and plunder.

Taking away cigarettes, cheap food, reasonable energy and water…..how can this end well?

More empty babble. But you got one thing right — dumb people own this state (well, run it). Starting with you, as you so proudly point out.

Richie

Liten up…..your head could explode reading lengthy posts…..CWD budding Sages appear experts on most subjects…..each and every day.

The average working stiff can’t cut this heady stuff…..give us a break….there are more of us than you…we own California.

This crank , Auntie Free Stuff’s favorite nephew, is dangerous, a member of the Javan warted pig genus,
a believer in free cheese for Lexus drivers with stolen plates, and opposed to the dignity of work, any work.
This jerk believes in a “living wage” for wipingvyour own butt after
defeating an EBT burger and fries.
Dependency is better per Kevie the crook.
Oink, Conehead.

Which is your way of saying you can’t think of anything to say in rebuttal. As usual.

Guess doomers like little kids coughing, wearing masks with eyes red and watering-

Pity

Contributory to the “islands” high cost of fuel is that California’s boutique fuels are not manufactured at present in other states or countries, the high California taxes on fuel, and the extra costs for California’s emission crusade. There are no pipelines to bring into the state, the energy needed to run the economy

If and when other states or countries opt to manufacture the California boutique fuels, the results of importing our energy needs via trucks, rail and ships from States and Counties that have less stringent environmental controls than California, would be increases to the world’s greenhouse gasses, and increases in costs for our transportation fuels, energy, and every product that are the basis of our standard of living for those living in California.

With crude oil imports from Alaska on the decline, and both in-state and offshore exploration of crude oil hampered by regulations and also on the decline, California imports more than 50% of its crude oil needs from foreign countries.

When will the SQAQMD provide “transparency” of the results of the emissions crusade? The public, especially the homeless and poor, that are paying dearly for the emissions crusade efforts of the SCAQMD, deserves to know if there is any progress over the last decade in reducing California’s 2006 1% contribution to the world’s greenhouse gases.

California’s flagship climate change policy Assembly Bill 32, the Global Warming Initiative was signed into law in 2006 when California was contributing 1% to the worlds green hose gases. And now, 10 years later, by AVOIDING transparency of the results of the California emissions crusade, the state can focus on how to spend the cap and trade funds they receive.

Now, a decade later, California still contributes a miniscule 1 percent ( 1%) and has had little to no impact on the reduction of global greenhouse gas emissions. With many of the businesses the emit now departed from California, the contributions to the worlds greenhouse gases has actually INCREASED as no other state or country comes close to California which has the most stringent environmental laws and regulations in the world.

Yet, the state, by avoiding transparency of the results of the California emissions crusade remains on a go-it-alone crusade to micro manage the California emissions that generates billions of dollars for the government at the expense of businesses and the financially challenged. With numerous state government agencies there is a feeding frenzy on getting a piece of the lucrative cap and trade tax revenue, yet there remains no progress in California reducing its contribution to the Worlds Greenhouse gasses.

The public, especially the homeless and poor, that are paying dearly for the emissions crusade efforts of the SCAQMD, deserves to know if there is any progress over the last decade in reducing California’s 1% contribution to the world’s greenhouse gases.