Comments on: California lawmakers seek to revise parole reform law

By: gate.oi

gate.oi — Sat, 18 Mar 2023 08:50:49 +0000

I am currently perfecting my thesis on gate.oi, and I found your article, thank you very much, your article gave me a lot of different ideas. But I have some questions, can you help me answer them?

By: binance dolar kuru neden farklı

binance dolar kuru neden farklı — Sun, 05 Mar 2023 09:08:54 +0000

Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I’ve really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon!

By: Standing Fast

Standing Fast — Wed, 01 Feb 2017 18:12:16 +0000

In reply to David Wiltsee.

Thank you, Mr. Wiltsee.

I, too, would like to see what Prop. 57 calls “non-violent”. I know that raping an unconscious person is considered a non-violent crime. I guess that means if you knock someone out first, that might be considered violence but the rape doesn’t count?

God bless the former Sacramento County sheriff.

Yes, CalWatchdog, please publish a list. And send it to the newspapers and broadcast news shows and other online outlets. It would be good publicity for you.

By: David Wiltsee

David Wiltsee — Wed, 01 Feb 2017 05:41:29 +0000

A simple listing of “non-violent crimes” would be an eye-opener for most people. I heard an ex-Sacramento County sheriff list such crimes on a radio show once, and it made my hair stand on end. How about it, CalWatchdog.

By: Partybreaker

Partybreaker — Tue, 31 Jan 2017 20:54:48 +0000

Newsom is ok with this as long as forced sex with a goat or sheep is excluded.

By: Standing Fast

Standing Fast — Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:05:39 +0000

I’m glad prop. 57 is being “fixed”. I wish it hadn’t passed and that California voters will repeal it. So-called “nonviolent” crimes may not involve physical violence, but any time someone commits a crime, they are violating somebody’s Constitutional Rights.

These rights belong to each individual and not to the government.

James Madison said that we have a Right to Our Property and a Property in Our Rights. This means that if our rights are violated, damage has been done to us and therefore we have suffered a form of violence.

Loss of well-being from a so-called “non-violent” theft is still a loss, and such loss does violence to a person’s Liberty.

In my opinion, there is no such thing as a “non-violent” crime. All crimes are, by their nature, one form of violence or another.