Yeah, this is hilarious. Mann has been notorious about using lawsuits to silence anyone who criticizes any of his so called ‘work’. He famously sued Mark Steyn and others before and lost or dropped the cases.
One of the principals in the current lawsuit apparently ticked off Mann by saying he called himself a researcher from Penn State. But in truth, because of his faulty data, he actually deserved to be in the state pen. Good line actually.
But Mann stepped in his own trap with this last suit. During the discovery portion of the law suit, as is the defense’s right, the opposition subpoenaed all data related to his ‘hockey stick’ conclusion. Mann knew he could not produce this as it will immediately prove it had been manipulated.
Thus the current contempt citation.
It doesn’t get better than this.Exposing to the light of truth the climate change death cultists one cockroach at a time.

“Only possible outcome: Mann’s humiliation, defeat and likely criminal investigation in the U.S.”

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/07/scientist-michael-mann-commits-contempt-court-climate-science-trial-century/

Our Legislators crusade to maintain the Cap and Trade “revenue generator” through 2030 provides the public with a dim forecast in the coming years as the burden of additional fuel costs will be falling completely on motorists and businesses. More cost increases that are coming are: A) Starting in November 2017, SB1 will add significant tax increases to gasoline and diesel fuels, as well as higher registration fees to finance transportation infrastructure, B) 4 years from now, according to estimates from the (LAO), Cap and Trade could raise gas prices by another 63 cents per gallon in 2021, increasing to 73 cents per gallon in 2031, and D) California’s LCFS is expected to grow and overtake the Cap and Trade costs.

The inconvenient truth about AB 32, as well as Cap and Trade, is that we now have higher gasoline prices and higher electricity costs. The coastal elites who support “going green” at all costs just don’t care that the working poor and struggling middle class living away from California’s coast are bearing the brunt of higher energy costs. Tellingly, our state has the worst poverty rate in the nation where 1 out of 5 California families are barely hanging on. Thus, it’s hard to understand the time and effort being extended on the subject of the emissions crusade that is obviously negatively impacting our poverty and homeless populations.

It’s our Legislators that are causing the price of California fuels to increase, not the oil companies. With the approval to extend the Cap and Trade system to 2030,California’s top politicians will have immense effects on what consumers spend for gasoline and a myriad of other products and services.

Slow growth is expensive. You betcha. No need to discriminate just play take away and slowly starve the little people out.

Seniors, the sick or disabled and minorities just don’t pencil anymore-

You make the least amount of sense of any commenter on here. Your single paragraph is an exercise in contradiction.

Looking over the new details of the bill, I am not sure if it was worth it. I probably shouldn’t celebrate their votes based on compromise rather than what is right. As for climate change, the scientists have exaggerated the claims that population crises will happen by the year 2050. Our Earth is huge and there’s no way knowing when something disastrous. However, climate change is probably real. There’s evidence that our sea levels are rising, ice caps are melting, and certain countries like Egypt and Saudi Arabia are losing water from a long drought.