Comments on: Utilities’ bid for help on wildfire costs finds renewed hope

By: gate.io衍生品

gate.io衍生品 — Sun, 26 Mar 2023 21:07:14 +0000

Reading your article has greatly helped me, and I agree with you. But I still have some questions. Can you help me? I will pay attention to your answer. thank you.

By: Anonymiss

Anonymiss — Mon, 26 Mar 2018 08:12:04 +0000

It is ridiculous that we, the rate-payers, are looking to be financial raped over this. Considering that there is an essential monopoly which these companies have, perhaps it is time to “open the field” and allow for other companies to compete. Perhaps then, these companies won’t be so complacent. It’s just too bad that the rate payers of PG&E and SDG&E can’t tell them, “YOU’RE FIRED!” and have another company provide their electricity. Sometimes, competition is a GOOD thing!

By: Machiavelli

Machiavelli — Sun, 25 Mar 2018 20:32:04 +0000

A possible solution to this issue of allowing zoning to locate houses close to transmission and distribution lines is to install the next generation of newer technology transmission line cables with a copper core but wrapped in composite ceramic material. This newer technology would result in minimal line sag during hot days or forest fires and the towers could also be built of composite material. This new cable would also increase transmission line capacity two times over conventional lines and are cheaper to install. China, South Africa, India and Indonesia are already having the buildout of their power line grids with this new cable. Here is link to one manufacturer – http://mercurycableinternational.com