<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: ‘Three California’ plan won’t appear on November ballot, California Supreme Court rules	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2018/07/19/three-california-plan-wont-appear-on-november-ballot-california-supreme-court-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2018/07/19/three-california-plan-wont-appear-on-november-ballot-california-supreme-court-rules/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 18:51:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: seesaw		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2018/07/19/three-california-plan-wont-appear-on-november-ballot-california-supreme-court-rules/#comment-143204</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[seesaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 18:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=96409#comment-143204</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2018/07/19/three-california-plan-wont-appear-on-november-ballot-california-supreme-court-rules/#comment-143143&quot;&gt;Standing Fast&lt;/a&gt;.

I learned by listening that it would be a constitutional revision--not a constitutional amendment.  A constitutional revision would require legislative action prior to any citizen action.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2018/07/19/three-california-plan-wont-appear-on-november-ballot-california-supreme-court-rules/#comment-143143">Standing Fast</a>.</p>
<p>I learned by listening that it would be a constitutional revision&#8211;not a constitutional amendment.  A constitutional revision would require legislative action prior to any citizen action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: seesaw		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2018/07/19/three-california-plan-wont-appear-on-november-ballot-california-supreme-court-rules/#comment-143203</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[seesaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 18:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=96409#comment-143203</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2018/07/19/three-california-plan-wont-appear-on-november-ballot-california-supreme-court-rules/#comment-143112&quot;&gt;ricky65&lt;/a&gt;.

It was not hijacked on a whim--it was removed according to the judges&#039; best interpretation of the constitution.  That&#039;s why they are in the position they are in.  Calling judges thugs?  Please!  Can&#039;t we have intelligent discourse!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2018/07/19/three-california-plan-wont-appear-on-november-ballot-california-supreme-court-rules/#comment-143112">ricky65</a>.</p>
<p>It was not hijacked on a whim&#8211;it was removed according to the judges&#8217; best interpretation of the constitution.  That&#8217;s why they are in the position they are in.  Calling judges thugs?  Please!  Can&#8217;t we have intelligent discourse!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Teddy the Tedliest Steele		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2018/07/19/three-california-plan-wont-appear-on-november-ballot-california-supreme-court-rules/#comment-143197</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Teddy the Tedliest Steele]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 01:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=96409#comment-143197</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Doomers, the GOP and their Moscow handles are upset abut this ruling--- Moscow wanted the chaos.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doomers, the GOP and their Moscow handles are upset abut this ruling&#8212; Moscow wanted the chaos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Standing Fast		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2018/07/19/three-california-plan-wont-appear-on-november-ballot-california-supreme-court-rules/#comment-143143</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Standing Fast]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 20:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=96409#comment-143143</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2018/07/19/three-california-plan-wont-appear-on-november-ballot-california-supreme-court-rules/#comment-143124&quot;&gt;Hcat&lt;/a&gt;.

Not if it involves a question of Constitutionality.  Putting a measure on the ballot that would require a Constitutional Amendment means the process is not the same as this proposal suggests.

If it is a good thing, the people behind should follow the rules.  If it is a bad thing, the fact that they didn&#039;t is a blessing in disguise for those of us who oppose it.

Not everything liberal judges do is wrong, and not everything conservative judges do is right.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2018/07/19/three-california-plan-wont-appear-on-november-ballot-california-supreme-court-rules/#comment-143124">Hcat</a>.</p>
<p>Not if it involves a question of Constitutionality.  Putting a measure on the ballot that would require a Constitutional Amendment means the process is not the same as this proposal suggests.</p>
<p>If it is a good thing, the people behind should follow the rules.  If it is a bad thing, the fact that they didn&#8217;t is a blessing in disguise for those of us who oppose it.</p>
<p>Not everything liberal judges do is wrong, and not everything conservative judges do is right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hcat		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2018/07/19/three-california-plan-wont-appear-on-november-ballot-california-supreme-court-rules/#comment-143124</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hcat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2018 03:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=96409#comment-143124</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was not going to support this anyway. I would have if the coastal state had included the Bay Area. But taking it off the ballot was wrong.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was not going to support this anyway. I would have if the coastal state had included the Bay Area. But taking it off the ballot was wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Spurwing Plover		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2018/07/19/three-california-plan-wont-appear-on-november-ballot-california-supreme-court-rules/#comment-143117</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Spurwing Plover]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 22:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=96409#comment-143117</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We  up here  in  Southern  Orecon/Northern  California have prefered The State of Jefferson without  the   Sanctuary   State Democrats  like Moonbeam  and  his  outlaw govenorship]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We  up here  in  Southern  Orecon/Northern  California have prefered The State of Jefferson without  the   Sanctuary   State Democrats  like Moonbeam  and  his  outlaw govenorship</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom in SoCal		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2018/07/19/three-california-plan-wont-appear-on-november-ballot-california-supreme-court-rules/#comment-143114</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom in SoCal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 18:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=96409#comment-143114</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2018/07/19/three-california-plan-wont-appear-on-november-ballot-california-supreme-court-rules/#comment-143103&quot;&gt;Bob Smith&lt;/a&gt;.

I am not sorry to see it pulled from the ballot.  I rather liked his original plan of 6 states better.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2018/07/19/three-california-plan-wont-appear-on-november-ballot-california-supreme-court-rules/#comment-143103">Bob Smith</a>.</p>
<p>I am not sorry to see it pulled from the ballot.  I rather liked his original plan of 6 states better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ulysses Uhaul		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2018/07/19/three-california-plan-wont-appear-on-november-ballot-california-supreme-court-rules/#comment-143113</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ulysses Uhaul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 16:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=96409#comment-143113</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wonderful news.  Doomer calls again off all kinds for trailers and trucks and our top grade Myrmar packing supplies.   

We love ya.  Mmmmwha! 

 Call Ole Uly any time!!!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful news.  Doomer calls again off all kinds for trailers and trucks and our top grade Myrmar packing supplies.   </p>
<p>We love ya.  Mmmmwha! </p>
<p> Call Ole Uly any time!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ricky65		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2018/07/19/three-california-plan-wont-appear-on-november-ballot-california-supreme-court-rules/#comment-143112</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ricky65]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 15:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=96409#comment-143112</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I wasn&#039;t going to vote for this anyway because it only made problems worse for us rural folks in Nor Cal  seeking freedom from the addicts and fecalites of the lunatic left Bay area. But something has to be done about the black robed thugs who can hijack the people&#039;s initiative process and change it on a whim.
Legislation by adjudication.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t going to vote for this anyway because it only made problems worse for us rural folks in Nor Cal  seeking freedom from the addicts and fecalites of the lunatic left Bay area. But something has to be done about the black robed thugs who can hijack the people&#8217;s initiative process and change it on a whim.<br />
Legislation by adjudication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Standing Fast		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2018/07/19/three-california-plan-wont-appear-on-november-ballot-california-supreme-court-rules/#comment-143104</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Standing Fast]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 19:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=96409#comment-143104</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2018/07/19/three-california-plan-wont-appear-on-november-ballot-california-supreme-court-rules/#comment-143103&quot;&gt;Bob Smith&lt;/a&gt;.

Yeah, I was wondering about that, too.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2018/07/19/three-california-plan-wont-appear-on-november-ballot-california-supreme-court-rules/#comment-143103">Bob Smith</a>.</p>
<p>Yeah, I was wondering about that, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-17 16:42:17 by W3 Total Cache
-->