<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Community-choice local energy programs keep expanding	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2019/02/21/community-choice-local-energy-programs-keep-expanding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2019/02/21/community-choice-local-energy-programs-keep-expanding/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 17:24:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Topher		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2019/02/21/community-choice-local-energy-programs-keep-expanding/#comment-147473</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Topher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2019 17:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=97268#comment-147473</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve reached out to the CPUC as well as their consumer advocate about SDG&#038;E rates in general being well outside the realm of reasonable, averaging over 0.33/kWh. I am excited to see some competition in this space, but unhappy about the &#039;exit fees&#039; we will be charged as a result... SDG&#038;E/Sempra are in good shape either way, as they can cut staff and increase overall profits, even though their bottom-line revenue will decrease.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve reached out to the CPUC as well as their consumer advocate about SDG&amp;E rates in general being well outside the realm of reasonable, averaging over 0.33/kWh. I am excited to see some competition in this space, but unhappy about the &#8216;exit fees&#8217; we will be charged as a result&#8230; SDG&amp;E/Sempra are in good shape either way, as they can cut staff and increase overall profits, even though their bottom-line revenue will decrease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sean		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2019/02/21/community-choice-local-energy-programs-keep-expanding/#comment-147348</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2019 16:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=97268#comment-147348</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[SDG&#038;E says it welcomes its infrastructure only role.  I wonder why?  Perhaps it recognizes that as the dispatchable portion of the generating capacity declines and the renewable portion increases, they realize there will be a much greater volatility in wholesale pricing and higher risk of power interruptions.  In essence, the risk for purchasing wholesale power and selling it now resides with Clean Power Alliance.  With a boat load of mandated solar and wind that won&#039;t be an easy task.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SDG&amp;E says it welcomes its infrastructure only role.  I wonder why?  Perhaps it recognizes that as the dispatchable portion of the generating capacity declines and the renewable portion increases, they realize there will be a much greater volatility in wholesale pricing and higher risk of power interruptions.  In essence, the risk for purchasing wholesale power and selling it now resides with Clean Power Alliance.  With a boat load of mandated solar and wind that won&#8217;t be an easy task.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-14 08:32:27 by W3 Total Cache
-->