<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Arizona &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/arizona/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 23:35:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>AZ not CA nabs giant new Apple center</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/02/02/az-not-ca-nabs-giant-new-apple-center/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/02/02/az-not-ca-nabs-giant-new-apple-center/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Seiler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2015 23:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Seiler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesa]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=73218</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As noted in my article today, &#8220;CA tech juggernaut jumps above rest of state,&#8221; the Silicon Valley wizards are doing well &#8212; even as manufacturing jobs have been halved since]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignright  wp-image-73219" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Mesa-arizona-postcard.png" alt="Mesa, arizona postcard" width="299" height="181" srcset="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Mesa-arizona-postcard.png 360w, https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Mesa-arizona-postcard-300x182.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 299px) 100vw, 299px" />As noted in my article today, &#8220;<a href="http://calwatchdog.com/2015/02/02/ca-tech-juggernaut-jumps-above-rest-of-state/">CA tech juggernaut jumps above rest of state</a>,&#8221; the Silicon Valley wizards are doing well &#8212; even as manufacturing jobs have been halved since 1990.</p>
<p>This is emphasized by a new development: Apple is building a giant new &#8220;command center&#8221; not in California, but Arizona. <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/102389945" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Reported CNBC</a>:</p>
<div class="group">
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em><a class="inline_quotes" href="http://data.cnbc.com/quotes/AAPL" target="_self" data-gdsid="8016" data-inline-quote-symbol="AAPL" rel="noopener">Apple</a> will invest $2 billion to build up a data center in Mesa, <a href="http://www.cnbc.com/id/10000547" target="_self" rel="noopener">Arizona</a>, the company announced Monday.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>The new facility—which will serve as a command center for the company&#8217;s global networks—is expected to employ 150 full-time Apple employees and will hire 300 to 500 construction and trade jobs, according to a news release from Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey. The tech giant said it would be one of the largest investments it has ever made.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>Apple has pledged to completely power the facility with renewable energy, building out solar projects in the process.</em></p>
<p>All that solar power could have helped California with its renewable projects as mandated by<a href="http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/ab32/ab32.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> AB 32</a> and other California environmental laws.</p>
<p>Yet complying with those laws also is expensive, something lawmakers never seem to take into account. Make one mistake in compliance and you&#8217;re hit with massive fines.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s California&#8217;s massive tax extractions, something much less in Arizona. The cost of living for Apple&#8217;s workers also will be less. The median price for a home in Mesa is about <a href="http://www.zillow.com/homes/for_sale/Mesa-AZ/32906732_zpid/19331_rid/days_sort/33.513633,-111.555691,33.277158,-111.919613_rect/11_zm/1_fr/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">$180,000</a>, according to Zillow.com. In Fremont, the last place Apple had a factory in California before it closed in 1993, it&#8217;s $<a href="http://www.zillow.com/homes/for_sale/Fremont-CA/25005205_zpid/11540_rid/days_sort/37.641694,-121.826534,37.417073,-122.190456_rect/11_zm/1_fr/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">754,000</a> &#8212; more than four times as much.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/02/02/az-not-ca-nabs-giant-new-apple-center/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73218</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Balanced budget amendment for Congress discussed at CPAC</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/03/16/balanced-budget-amendment-for-congress-discussed-at-cpac/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/03/16/balanced-budget-amendment-for-congress-discussed-at-cpac/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CalWatchdog Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 18:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Budget and Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov. Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Conservative Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governor Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grover Norquist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balanced]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan Brewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balanced budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josephine Djuhana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balanced budget amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpac 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpac2013]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=39303</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[March 16, 2013 By Josephine Djuhana NATIONAL HARBOR, Md.&#8212;Some conservatives believe a federal balanced budget amendment is an essential reform for fiscal management in Congress. That was the topic of]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" class="alignright  wp-image-39306" style="margin-left: 20px; margin-right: 20px;" alt="Andy Harris Maryland" src="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Andy-Harris-Maryland.jpg" width="317" height="238" align="right" hspace="20" /></p>
<p>March 16, 2013</p>
<p>By Josephine Djuhana</p>
<p>NATIONAL HARBOR, Md.&#8212;Some conservatives believe a federal balanced budget amendment is an essential reform for fiscal management in Congress. That was the topic of discussion during a panel at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at the National Harbor in Maryland.</p>
<p>Grover Norquist, the founder and president of Americans for Tax Reform, moderated the discussion and began with a simple two-part plan for Washington to balance the budget—by “never raising taxes” and “not spending so much of other people’s money.” He also highlighted Paul Ryan’s <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323826704578353902612840488.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">recently unveiled budget</a>, which rolls back entitlements and federal power, and balances the budget without raising taxes. The budget, according to Norquist, was not only a way to reduce the size of the federal government by reforming, but also a “step in the right direction to enact tax reform.”</p>
<p>Rep. Andy Harris, R-Md., said in reference to the Senate, “They don’t believe that the spending is the problem, and they don’t believe the debt or the deficit is a problem.” Anyone who has read Paul Krugman would know that to be the case. And even President Obama recently charged that he was not interested in a “balanced budget just for the sake of balance.” With much concern mounting over the nation’s ever-growing $16 trillion deficit, it’s no wonder that conservatives are now looking for ways to force Congress to create a balanced budget. But Democrats in Washington don’t seem to seem to agree on the need to halt spending, as the <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-money/budget/287983-murray-unites-dems-with-vague-budget" target="_blank" rel="noopener">budget proposal</a> from Senate Democrats, according to Norquist, “raises taxes and never balances the budget.” The budget plan includes $1 trillion in tax increases and a new $100 billion stimulus plan. It also increases spending by 60 percent over the next ten years, leaving an additional deficit of $500 billion ten years from now.</p>
<p><img decoding="async" class="alignright  wp-image-39307" style="margin-left: 20px; margin-right: 20px;" alt="Derrick Khanna Grover Norquist" src="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Derrick-Khanna-Grover-Norquist.jpg" width="317" height="238" align="right" hspace="20" /></p>
<p>“That’s why you need a balanced budget amendment, because in the end, [Washington] can’t restrain itself,” Rep. Harris said. “And we certainly can’t guarantee that future Congresses will restrain themselves.”</p>
<p>The panelist consensus was that outside intervention is needed in order to limit spending by Congress. “Unlimited debt is the fairy dust that makes unlimited government function,” said Nick Dranias, a director at the Goldwater Institute.</p>
<p>There are two methods to ratify a constitutional amendment, but the path through Congress does not seem promising, as it requires a two-thirds majority approval in both houses of Congress. The state method is the alternative.</p>
<p>“In the state method, there is a critical check and balance on federal government,” said Derrick Khanna; he’s a former professional staff member for the Republican Study Committee. “It is unfortunate that this method has never been used as our Founders intended.”</p>
<p>All that is needed is a three-fourths majority of states to ratify a constitutional amendment. “States across the country are pushing for a federal balanced budget. First it was Florida, in 2010, and then it was New Hampshire, last year,” said Khanna.</p>
<h3>Effects of a balanced budget amendment</h3>
<p>There are certain fears that with a balanced budget amendment, members of Congress could force a tax increase in order to ensure that revenues keep up with expenditures.</p>
<p>But Arizona, which has a balanced budget requirement, has used this obligation to its benefit by rejecting Obamacare. When Governor Jan Brewer attempted to raise taxes in order to fund Obamacare in the state, the state legislature shot the proposal down, as state tax increases require a two-thirds majority in order to be ratified.</p>
<p>The balanced budget requirement also seems to be working for the state of Texas.</p>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignright  wp-image-39308" alt="Texas Governor Rick Perry" src="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Texas-Governor-Rick-Perry.jpg" width="332" height="249" align="right" hspace="20" /></p>
<p>Texas Governor Rick Perry was also present at CPAC, and delivered short remarks on his state in comparison with the federal government.</p>
<p>“Texas has a balanced budget and a surplus, and is creating more jobs than any other state in the Union, and we’re doing this with a part-time legislature that meets for only 140 days every other year,” said Gov. Perry. “Our legislature—they come in and they pass laws, and then they go home and live under those laws.”</p>
<p>He then emphasized that states should be “the laboratories of reform.”</p>
<p>But instead, we have a federal government that mandates and dictates regulations to states, what with Obamacare and the expansion of Medicaid, the proposed increase in the minimum wage and more. Many conservative allies have fallen to money from the federal government and special interest groups, and we have reached a point where it seems that nothing can stop Washington from continuing on its taxing and spending binge.</p>
<p>“Washington doesn’t worry about how to pay its bills; they just charge it to our grandchildren’s accounts,” said Gov. Perry. “But in Texas, our constitution requires a balanced budget.”</p>
<p>Gov. Perry emphasized that Texas’ “number one ranking when it comes to job creation” is directly correlated to having “balanced budgets and one of the lowest tax and spending rates in the nation.”</p>
<h3>Framework for a balanced budget amendment</h3>
<p>During the panel, Nick Dranias highlighted the <a href="http://www.compactforamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/CFA-Text-BBA.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Compact for America</a>, which is a formal amendment to balance the budget and has additional inclusions that work to prevent outright taxation by Congress in order to balance the budget.</p>
<p>But the path to Congressional discipline on the fiscal matters will be an uphill battle, yet many activists would like to see Congress reexamine itself and its practices when it comes to balancing the budget. As government expands, liberties decrease, and the best way to curb government intervention is to take away its ability to spend recklessly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/03/16/balanced-budget-amendment-for-congress-discussed-at-cpac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">39303</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona boycott backfires</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/08/03/arizona-boycott-backfires/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CalWatchdog Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 06:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 1070]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boycott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Seiler]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=7421</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[John Seiler: You read it here first, folks. In several blogs over the past few months, I predicted that the boycott of Arizona for its immigration law, SB 1070, would]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Seiler:</p>
<p>You read it here first, folks. In several blogs over the past few months, I predicted that the boycott of Arizona for its immigration law, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/28/AR2010072801794.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">SB 1070</a>, would be a massive failure. The YouTube at the end of this blog has a report showing the Arizona economy is doing great (unlike depressed, Arnoldized Kalifornia), and tourism actually is <em>up</em>.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I wrote:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2010/04/27/s-f-should-declare-independence/">April 27</a>:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">San Francisco’s <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/04/26/BARD1D55P7.DTL&amp;feed=rss.bayarea" target="_blank" rel="noopener">announced boycott</a> of Arizona is ridiculous. They’re both part of the United States, so trade among the states, and cities, is regulated by the federal government.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2010/05/03/boycott-schmoycott-why-there-isnt-going-to-be-any-boycott-of-arizona/">May 3</a>:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">Boycott, schmoycott (why there isn’t going to be any boycott of Arizona).</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2010/05/12/l-a-s-joke-boycott-of-arizona/">May 12</a>:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">L.A.<a href="http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local-beat/LA-Council-Considers-Arizona-Boycott-93575949.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> just voted to end</a> “5 contracts  with Arizona-based companies that are worth a combined total of $7.7 million.”</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">It’ll make headlines, but it’s worthless.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">Arizona’s GDP is about <a href="http://phoenix.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/2007/07/16/daily3.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">$200 billion</a>. So, $7.7 million comes out to .00385 percent.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">I’m sure the Zonies are workin’ in shifts shaking in their flip-flops over that one.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2010/05/19/zonies-to-boycott-cal/">May 19</a>:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;"><a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2010/04/27/s-f-should-declare-independence/">I’ve</a> been <a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2010/05/03/boycott-schmoycott-why-there-isnt-going-to-be-any-boycott-of-arizona/">saying </a>all <a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2010/05/12/l-a-s-joke-boycott-of-arizona/">along </a>that California threats to boycott Arizona over the Zonies’ immigration law are a massive joke. Now I’m really cracking up.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">Now Arizona is threatening to cut off the electricity they send to California&#8230;.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">The Zonies should shut off L.A.’s power for 10 minutes just for fun.</p>
<p>Remember: CalWatchDog.com is a California Nostradamus. We&#8217;re the only ones who not only report on what&#8217;s going on here in California, we predict what&#8217;s going to happen next.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the YouTube:</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="500" height="405" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sbf8M5XJ_1Y&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?border=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7421</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona whites trust Latinos with concealed guns!</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/07/16/arizona-whites-trust-latinos-with-concealed-guns/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CalWatchdog Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 04:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[concealed carry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=6835</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[John Seiler: The caricature of Arizona presented by immigration activists, California politicians, and the Obama administration is that Arizona is intolerant toward Latinos. The new immigration law in AZ supposedly]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>John Seiler</em>: The caricature of Arizona presented by immigration activists, California politicians, and the Obama administration is that Arizona is intolerant toward Latinos. The new immigration law in AZ supposedly violates Latinos&#8217; rights, and was imposed by the whites who control the state Legislature. Obama is challenging it in court. California activists and politicians have advanced <a href="http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/boycott-arizona" target="_blank" rel="noopener">boycotts of Arizona</a>.</p>
<p>But you know what? In Arizona, the whites who control the Legislature actually <em>trust Latinos with concealed guns! </em>The Latinos don&#8217;t even need a permit. Any Latino who&#8217;s 21 years or older and is not a  felon can buy a gun and carry it around in his pocket, coat, or car. That&#8217;s according to <a href="http://www.azcentral.com/news/election/azelections/articles/2010/04/16/20100416arizona-concealed-weapons-bill16-ON.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">a new law just passed</a> by Arizona&#8217;s white Legislature.</p>
<p>By contrast, in California Latinos<a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2010/02/28/new-gun-rights-key-issue-in-sheriffs-races/"> mostly are banned</a> from carrying concealed weapons &#8212; even if they&#8217;re totally honest citizens, and even if their lives are threatened and they need protection. Let&#8217;s say a young Latino mother is threatened by her screwball Anglo ex-boyfriend. It takes 11 days just to get a gun, then she can only keep it at home, not carry it with her for self-defense.</p>
<p>The only exceptions are those getting special permission from county sheriffs, commonly (although not always)<a href="http://www.greencommons.org/node/827" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> for political favors</a>.</p>
<p>Clearly, Arizona is much more Latino-friendly that California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">6835</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-19 19:39:27 by W3 Total Cache
-->