<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Auto Club of Southern California &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/auto-club-of-southern-california/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 04:07:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>AAA Double Wrong on Propositions</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/11/01/aaa-double-wrong/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/11/01/aaa-double-wrong/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CalWatchdog Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 04:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics and Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 32]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto Club of Southern California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Seiler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop. 19]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop. 22]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop. 23]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=10430</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[John Seiler: Today I got in the mail the Automobile Club of Southern California&#8217;s ballot recommendations, limited to four of them. I&#8217;ve belonged to AAA for 25 years, and have]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/car-collision.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignright size-full wp-image-10432" title="car collision" src="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/car-collision.jpg" alt="" width="270" height="216" align="right" hspace=20/></a>John Seiler:</p>
<p>Today I got in the mail the Automobile Club of Southern California&#8217;s ballot recommendations, limited to four of them. I&#8217;ve belonged to AAA for 25 years, and have gotten their insurance for 23.</p>
<p>CEO Thomas V. McKernan writes:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Dear Southern California Neighbor:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">After carefully analyzing the statewide propositions, we wanted to share with you our thoughts and information on four of the propositions that are particularly important.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re right on two propositions. They oppose Prop. 21, which would impose an $18 per car tax to fund state parks. Even if you don&#8217;t use them. (My better idea: Privatize the parks. Turn them over to Disney.)</p>
<p>And they back Prop. 26, which requires &#8220;fees&#8221; to be passed with a two-thirds vote of the people. That would prevent politicians from redefining taxes, which already require a two-thirds vote of the people, as &#8220;fees&#8221; that currently require only a majority vote.</p>
<p>But AAA crashes and burns on two important propositions. They write:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>No on Proposition 19 </strong>&#8211; Legalizes marijuana, would increase drugged driving and traffic crashes, could allow employees to come to work high, and bans employers from being able to drug test their employees for marijuana.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all wrong, <a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2010/10/31/l-a-times-vs-prop-19/">as I explained yesterday</a>. Unfortunately, McKernan and AAA are part of the state&#8217;s political establishment, which opposes Prop. 19. And if they&#8217;re worried about crashes, why don&#8217;t they favor banning alcohol, which causes far more deadly accidents than the hippie lettuce, as was done during alcohol Prohibition? Down with Demon Rum!</p>
<p>Finally, he writes:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>YES on Proposition 22</strong> &#8212; Protects road and transit money by prohibiting the state from raiding local gas and tax funds.</p>
<p>Actually, Prop. 22 would guarantee the funding of redevelopment agencies that rob citizens to benefit private special interests. Such robbery violates the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Fourth Amendment</a> right to not be deprived of property without due process, and the Commandment &#8220;Thou shalt not steal.&#8221; How would McKernan like it of the government, using Prop. 22, stole his home and gave it to some rich company like Walmart?</p>
<p>When I was younger, I would boycott AAA for this. But nowadays, I oppose so much that companies do I&#8217;d have to boycott almost everything.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re still wrong. And when my insurance expires in 11 months, I&#8217;ll consider something else.</p>
<p>Oh, and it&#8217;s too bad they didn&#8217;t back Prop. 23, the jobs-saving proposition that would suspend the jobs-killing AB 32. When Prop. 23 loses, gas prices are going to rise. What happened to protecting California drivers?</p>
<p>Nov. 1, 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/11/01/aaa-double-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">10430</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-15 14:25:49 by W3 Total Cache
-->