<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Autonomous Vehicles &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/autonomous-vehicles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 18:05:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>DMV preps test rules for driverless delivery vehicles</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2019/04/25/dmv-preps-test-rules-for-driverless-delivery-vehicles/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2019/04/25/dmv-preps-test-rules-for-driverless-delivery-vehicles/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Reed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driverless deliveries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doordash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[starship technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Udelv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food deliveries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DMV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driverless cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autonomous Vehicles]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=97584</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In December 2015, when the state Department of Motor Vehicles released draft regulations for the testing of driverless vehicles, California tech firms were stunned by their onerousness. Google immediately objected]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="wp-block-image">
<figure class="alignright is-resized"><img decoding="async" src="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Uber-driverless-cars.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-92731" width="294" height="166" srcset="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Uber-driverless-cars.jpg 620w, https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Uber-driverless-cars-300x169.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 294px) 100vw, 294px" /><figcaption>An Uber driverless vehicle being tested in San Francisco is shown in this 2016 file photo.</figcaption></figure>
</div>
<p>In December 2015, when the state Department of Motor Vehicles <a href="https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/dmv/detail/vr/autonomous/milestones_regulations" target="_blank" rel="noopener">released</a> draft regulations for the testing of driverless vehicles, California tech firms were stunned by their onerousness. Google immediately objected to a proposed requirement that drivers always had to be behind the wheel of autonomous test vehicles.</p>
<p>Soon after, a consortium including TechNet, the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, the Bay Area Council, the Wireless Association, the Consumer Technology Association, the Information Technology Industry Council and the Auto Alliance issued a statement pleading with the administration of Gov. Jerry Brown to encourage, not discourage, the nascent driverless vehicle industry.</p>
<p>Instead, the DMV initially decided to allow each of the state’s 480-plus incorporated cities and 58 counties to set up their own rules for such testing – potentially creating an immense maze for driverless vehicle companies.</p>
<p>To the relief of executives with Google, Uber, Lyft, Volvo and 40-plus other companies interested in testing their vehicles in the Golden State, the state government reconsidered its position. Beginning in April 2018, new DMV rules allowed for autonomous vehicles to be tested without a human behind the wheel. So far, only one company has met DMV’s standards and obtained a permit for such tests – Mountain View’s Waymo. But far more could qualify in coming years.</p>
<p>Now, there is a fresh sign of the DMV’s willingness to embrace new vehicular technology. On April 12, the agency <a href="https://www.sfchronicle.com/business/article/California-ready-to-let-robot-vehicles-test-13763122.php" target="_blank" rel="noopener">released</a> draft regulations allowing for testing of autonomous delivery vehicles. Heavy-duty vehicles that weigh more than 10,000 pounds are not allowed, but standard cars, trucks and vans can be tested. The DMV will only issue permits for fully autonomous testing to companies that have met the same safety standards that Waymo did. The rules are expected to be finalized by December.</p>
<h4 class="wp-block-heading">Driverless deliveries may face less public anxiety</h4>
<p>With <a href="https://news.gallup.com/poll/234416/driverless-cars-tough-sell-americans.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener">polls</a> showing millions of Americans are very nervous about riding in driverless vehicles, tech and marketing experts <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2019/1/8/18173776/udelv-self-driving-delivery-walmart-baidu-ces-2019" target="_blank" rel="noopener">told</a> The Verge website in January they were much more likely to gain initial acceptance for delivery purposes. </p>
<p>Robot deliveries with much smaller vehicles have already proven instant hits. San Francisco-based startup <a href="https://www.starship.xyz/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Starship Technologies</a> has enjoyed huge success since January, when its 25 robots began deliveries on the 800-acre campus of George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia. Navigating campus paths and sidewalks at 4 miles per hour, the robots deliver small coolers capable of holding up to 20 pounds of groceries. Students use an <a href="https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/starship-deliveries/id1278308166?mt=8" target="_blank" rel="noopener">app</a> to direct the robots where to go and are sent access codes to open the coolers. Starship collects $1.99 per order.</p>
<p>A March 25 Washington Post <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2019/03/25/how-gmu-students-eating-habits-changed-when-delivery-robots-invaded-their-campus/?noredirect=on&amp;utm_term=.d729f220c08c" target="_blank" rel="noopener">story</a> depicted university officials as initially unsure what sort of reception the robots would get. But on the first day of deliveries, “the machines were flooded by so many dinner orders that school officials had to pull the plug, shutting off orders so that robots weren&#8217;t operating late into the night, far behind schedule,” the Post reported.</p>
<p>Since then, they’ve become an accepted convenience of campus life at the university. </p>
<h4 class="wp-block-heading">S.F. firm&#8217;s college delivery robots only the start</h4>
<p>In late March, Starship announced that an even bigger order of food-delivery robots, 30-plus, had been shipped to a second U.S. college – Northern Arizona University in Flagstaff. Unlike George Mason, NAU leaders were so confident the robots would be a hit with students that the university issued a <a href="https://news.nau.edu/starship-robots/#.XL_nDfHYqt0" target="_blank" rel="noopener">press release</a> quoting NAU President Rita Cheng as welcoming them to campus.</p>
<p>But much bolder plans are in the works. The Verge’s report in January noted that Burlingame-based startup Udelv was partnering with Walmart on an autonomous grocery-delivery service that will use the sort of vehicles that the California DMV is now crafting rules for. Home-food delivery services could be a $100 billion annual industry by 2025, the tech website reported.</p>
<p>The Udelv report came shortly after Cruise – GM’s autonomous vehicle company – announced it was <a href="https://www.theverge.com/2019/1/3/18166660/gm-cruise-doordash-test-self-driving-food-delivery" target="_blank" rel="noopener">teaming</a> with San Francisco-based DoorDash on the same sort of food-delivery venture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2019/04/25/dmv-preps-test-rules-for-driverless-delivery-vehicles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">97584</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CalWatchdog Morning Read &#8211; January 13</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2017/01/13/calwatchdog-morning-read-january-13/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2017/01/13/calwatchdog-morning-read-january-13/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CalWatchdog Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Morning Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xavier Becerra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Autonomous Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Coastal Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desalination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huntington Beach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-driving cars]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=92736</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Lawmaker targets Uber&#8217;s self-driving vehicles in new legislation  Scientists rebuke Coastal Commission over desalination Does Consumer Watchdog actually help lower insurance rates? Brown cuts doctors out of tobacco tax money Democratic]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><em><strong><img decoding="async" class="alignright  wp-image-79323" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/CalWatchdogLogo1.png" alt="" width="274" height="181" srcset="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/CalWatchdogLogo1.png 1024w, https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/CalWatchdogLogo1-300x198.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 274px) 100vw, 274px" />Lawmaker targets Uber&#8217;s self-driving vehicles in new legislation </strong></em></li>
<li><em><strong>Scientists rebuke Coastal Commission over desalination</strong></em></li>
<li><em><strong>Does Consumer Watchdog actually help lower insurance rates?</strong></em></li>
<li><em><strong>Brown cuts doctors out of tobacco tax money</strong></em></li>
<li><em><strong>Democratic lawmakers pushing for cap-and-trade extension</strong></em></li>
</ul>
<p>Good morning! TGIF. One lesson for the day: If you want to do something in the state, don&#8217;t try to get around the permitting process. </p>
<p>It’s not enough that Uber killed its unpermitted, self-driving-vehicle pilot program in San Francisco just a week after it started; an assemblyman wants to squash any further attempts to test vehicles without a permit as well. </p>
<p>Assemblyman Phil Ting, D-San Francisco, introduced legislation requiring the DMV to revoke registrations for self-driving vehicles in violation of the state’s <a href="https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/dmv/detail/vr/autonomous/testing" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Autonomous Vehicle Tester Program</a>. The bill is a response to Uber, which last year began testing its vehicles without a permit, even picking up passengers, violating state regulations. And one of the vehicles ran a red light. </p>
<p>Under Ting’s bill, law enforcement would have the authority to impound violating vehicles and the DMV could fine as much as $25,000 per vehicle per day. </p>
<p>“I applaud our innovation economy and all the companies developing autonomous vehicle technology, but no community should face what we did in San Francisco,” Ting said in a statement. “The pursuit of innovation does not include a license to put innocent lives at risk.”</p>
<p style="margin: 1em 0; padding: 0; -ms-text-size-adjust: 100%; -webkit-text-size-adjust: 100%; color: #606060; font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 15px; line-height: 150%; text-align: left;"><a href="http://calwatchdog.com/2017/01/12/assemblyman-wants-crack-unpermitted-self-driving-vehicles/">CalWatchdog</a> has more. </p>
<p><strong>In other news:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>&#8220;The Coastal Commission’s stated concern that a proposed Huntington Beach desalination plant’s intake pipes pose a threat to small and microscopic plankton has been rebutted in a letter from three prominent California marine biologists.&#8221; <a href="http://calwatchdog.com/2017/01/10/scientists-rebuke-coastal-commission-desalination/">CalWatchdog</a> has more. </p>
</li>
<li>
<p>&#8220;Consumer Watchdog collects millions, but does it lower your insurance rates?&#8221; <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/news/investigations/the-public-eye/article126279069.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Sacramento Bee</a> has the story. </p>
</li>
<li>
<p>&#8220;Jerry Brown doesn&#8217;t want to give doctors a cut of the new tobacco tax money,&#8221; writes <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article126274099.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Sacramento Bee</a>. </p>
</li>
<li>
<p>&#8220;Days after Governor Jerry Brown called for an extension of California’s signature greenhouse gas reduction program and threatened to withhold money it generates until that happens, Assembly Democrats introduced legislation.&#8221; <a href="http://www.capradio.org/articles/2017/01/12/assembly-democrats-propose-cap-and-trade-extension/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Capital Public Radio</a> has more. </p>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Legislature:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Assembly is in at 9 a.m. to vote on the appointment of Xavier Becerra as state attorney general.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Gov. Brown: </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>No public events announced. </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Tips:</strong> matt@calwatchdog.com</p>
<p><strong>Follow us:</strong> @calwatchdog @mflemingterp</p>
<p><strong>New follower:</strong> <a class="ProfileCard-screennameLink u-linkComplex js-nav" href="https://twitter.com/ChrisLevinson" data-aria-label-part="" data-send-impression-cookie="true" target="_blank" rel="noopener">@<span class="u-linkComplex-target">ChrisLevinson</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2017/01/13/calwatchdog-morning-read-january-13/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">92736</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-17 10:29:05 by W3 Total Cache
-->