<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>beach eradication &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/beach-eradication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>Blame sequester theater, not sequester, for threat to CA beach</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/08/29/blame-sequester-theater-not-sequester-for-threat-to-ca-beach/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/08/29/blame-sequester-theater-not-sequester-for-threat-to-ca-beach/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Reed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 13:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste, Fraud, and Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ray LaHood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timm Herdt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ventura County Star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester theater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Port Hueneme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beach eradication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army Corps of Engineers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Reed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama White House]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=48914</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sequestration theater &#8212; the Obama administration&#8217;s attempt to make a de facto freeze on overall government spending as painful and inconvenient as possible &#8212; is absolutely real. It&#8217;s not an]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-48923" alt="axe-sequester" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/axe-sequester.jpg" width="250" height="266" align="right" hspace="20" />Sequestration theater &#8212; the Obama administration&#8217;s attempt to make a <a href="http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-08-23/politics/41442751_1_government-spending-government-shutdown-big-government" target="_blank" rel="noopener">de facto freeze</a> on overall government spending as painful and inconvenient as possible &#8212; is absolutely real. It&#8217;s not an invention of the president&#8217;s GOP critics. Just look at the pathetic attempt to squeeze air travelers this spring by furloughing 15,000 air traffic controllers.</p>
<p>As I wrote at the time &#8230;</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;The Transportation Department, parent to the FAA, has a $73 billion annual budget. Of course Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood could find another way to make his department’s share of budget cuts required by the March 1 sequestration of funds.</em></p>
<p id="h689767-p4" style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;Another word for this is ridiculous. The same Transportation Department has sent $3.5 billion to California for our bullet-train boondoggle.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Soon after, Congress figured this out and ordered transportation officials to prioritize.</p>
<h3>Uncritical regurgitation of Obama talking points</h3>
<p>Now along comes a California example of the Obama administration&#8217;s attempt to make the sequester as bad as possible &#8212; and it finds an accomplice in Ventura County Star columnist Timm Herdt, who in a <a href="http://www.vcstar.com/news/2013/aug/27/timm-herdt-a-super-storm-of-federal-paralysis/?opinion=1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">700 words</a> doesn&#8217;t even raise the possibility that the White House may be to blame for failing to prioritize federal spending or demand smarter decision-making from Army engineers:<br />
<img decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-48925" alt="port.hueneme" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/port.hueneme.gif" width="337" height="182" align="right" hspace="20" /></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;If there is any place in America where one can take a photograph of the obtuse federal process known as sequestration, it is in a small coastal community in Southern California.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;In the city of Port Hueneme, a beach that is typically as wide as a football field has disappeared. The Pacific Ocean is encroaching. It has already wiped out an outdoor shower used by beachgoers and undermined a sidewalk. It is threatening to breach a city street called Surfside Drive. Beyond that are homes, condominiums and public facilities. &#8230;</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;&#8216;We&#8217;re not a beach-resort community,&#8217; says Mayor Ellis Green. &#8216;We are a humble town.&#8217;</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;The winter is approaching, which will bring with it storms and higher tides. The seawater is creeping toward what Green calls a &#8216;catastrophe&#8217; that could cause tens or hundreds of millions of dollars in damages.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;If this happens, it will not be a natural disaster. It will be a super storm brought about by federal budget paralysis.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Later on, Herdt more specifically blames &#8220;leadership in the House&#8221; for refusing to ride to the rescue of the Army Corps of Engineers and fund needed work.</p>
<h3>Never mentioned: Army Corps&#8217; budget has gone up</h3>
<p>Does he mention that the Army Corps of Engineers multibillion-dollar civil works&#8217; budget is higher <a href="http://www.usace.army.mil/Media/NewsReleases/NewsReleaseArticleView/tabid/231/Article/12641/presidents-fiscal-2014-budget-for-us-army-corps-of-engineers-civil-works-releas.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener">this year</a> than <a href="http://www.usace.army.mil/Media/NewsReleases/NewsReleaseArticleView/tabid/231/Article/269/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">last year</a>, which certainly suggests what we&#8217;re seeing in Port Hueneme is sequester theater?</p>
<p>No.</p>
<p>Does Herdt mention that the sequester was the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/obamas-fanciful-claim-that-congress-proposed-the-sequester/2012/10/25/8651dc6a-1eed-11e2-ba31-3083ca97c314_blog.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">White House&#8217;s idea</a>?</p>
<p>No.</p>
<p>Does Herdt mention the reports that lots of agencies that feared doom and gloom quietly prioritized spending and felt few effects from sequestration, as the <a href="http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-06-30/politics/40292466_1_sequestration-predictions-obama-administration" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Washington Post</a>, <a href="http://reason.com/blog/2013/08/19/gnomes-underpants-theory-of-sequester-fe" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Reason</a> and many other publications have repeatedly reported?</p>
<p>No. Hey, Timm, even the Canadians  have figured out <a href="http://www2.macleans.ca/2013/06/11/what-budget-cuts-u-s-sequestration-is-not-as-bad-as-feared/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">sequestration</a> isn&#8217;t what it was billed. And note that an L.A. Times report insinuates <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2013/mar/22/local/la-me-airport-tower-shutdown-20130323" target="_blank" rel="noopener">this is all theater</a> as well.</p>
<p>But in California, if you&#8217;re an opinion columnist, your default position is usually to find a way to blame everything on evil conservatives.</p>
<p>And so you conclude that the federal government &#8212; which had a $3.5 trillion budget last year and a $3.5 trillion budget this year &#8212; can&#8217;t handle its customary Port Hueneme protection responsibilities because of House Republicans.</p>
<p>Feel free to groan. And groan. And groan some more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/08/29/blame-sequester-theater-not-sequester-for-threat-to-ca-beach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">48914</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-14 16:22:02 by W3 Total Cache
-->