<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>bureaucrats &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/bureaucrats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:27:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>State bureaucrats get surprise smack down at hearing</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/03/08/state-bureaucrats-get-surprise-smack-down-at-hearing/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/03/08/state-bureaucrats-get-surprise-smack-down-at-hearing/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CalWatchdog Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste, Fraud, and Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katy Grimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacramento]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bureaucrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sen. Jim Beall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Parks Fund Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Parks and Recreation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=38918</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[March 7, 2013 By Katy Grimes SACRAMENTO &#8212; It has never been more apparent that unelected state bureaucrats are also unaccountable to the Legislature. I attend legislative committee hearings every]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>March 7, 2013</p>
<p>By Katy Grimes</p>
<p><a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2013/03/08/state-bureaucrats-get-surprise-smack-down-at-hearing/photo043-thumbnail/" rel="attachment wp-att-38920"><img decoding="async" class="alignright size-full wp-image-38920" alt="photo043.thumbnail" src="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/photo043.thumbnail.jpg" width="200" height="200" align="right" hspace="20" /></a></p>
<p>SACRAMENTO &#8212; It has never been more apparent that unelected state bureaucrats are also unaccountable to the Legislature. I attend legislative committee hearings every week, and despite the questions from lawmakers, the bureaucrats obfuscate, and get away with it.</p>
<p>High-speed rail is the most blatant example of this. Every hearing in which High-Speed Rail Authority CEO Jeff Morales has testified, leaves lawmakers shaking their heads because of his bureaucrat-speak &#8212; there are rarely answers to lawmakers&#8217; questions.</p>
<p>And state bureaucrats get away with this.</p>
<h3>A new Sheriff in town</h3>
<p>The friendly, kind, portly bearded man who sat in the last row of the Assembly for six years is now in the Senate. Sen. Jim Beall may be kind and friendly, but Thursday he handed state bureaucrats their behinds. And it was a beautiful thing.</p>
<p>Used to speaking in circles at committee hearings, these bureaucrats, from the state Natural Resources agency, the troubled Parks and Recreation department, and the governor&#8217;s Department of Finance, didn&#8217;t know what hit them. It was as if Santa Clause had gone rogue.</p>
<p>Beall, a Democrat from San Jose, knows his way around a hearing room. He&#8217;s been a politician since he cut his teeth on the San Jose City Council, 1980 &#8211; 1994, as a county supervisor 1994 &#8211; 2006, and the Assembly 2006 &#8211; 2012.</p>
<p>The hearing was the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review, Subcommittee No. 2 <a href="http://sbud.senate.ca.gov/sites/sbud.senate.ca.gov/files/SUB2/2262013Sub2JtHearingHighSpeedRail.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">on Resources, Environmental Protection, Energy and Transportation</a>, and Beall made it very clear, politely, that he intended to get answers to his budget questions.</p>
<h3>Troubled Parks Department appears still troubled</h3>
<p>&#8220;The Parks and Recreation situation&#8230; what has taken place, since some of the funds have several problems?&#8221; Beall asked Farra Bracht with the Legislative Anakyst&#8217;s Office. Bracht explained the Dpartment of Finance went through all of the other special funds in the state, and matched them up with totals with what the Controller has.</p>
<p>&#8220;Regardless of the size of the fund, we need to make sure all of it is accounted for so we don&#8217;t get caught not accounting for it,&#8221; Beall said. &#8220;They are taxpayers funds.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;This makes me nervous being chairman of the committee,&#8221; Beall said of the many special fund accounts in the state. &#8220;And when I am nervous, I do things.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;A good starting point is to ask the Department of Finance what they are doing about it on an ongoing basis,&#8221; Bracht said.</p>
<h3>Parks and Recreation scandal</h3>
<p>While the State Parks and Recreation department was soliciting private donations to keep 70 state parks open, top agency employees were bilking the state for large vacation pay buyouts, and $54 million sat in a special fund, unreported.</p>
<p>Beall was relentless.</p>
<p>John Laird, the Secretary for the Natural Resources agency was unable to be at the hearing. Laird sent an Assistant Secretary for the agency in his place. But he mumbled his name, and no one asked him to identify himself again.  It was apparent Laird knew exactly which bureaucrat to send in his place if there was to be a grilling.</p>
<p>Kemp tried to quickly move away from the Parks and Rec scandal, but Beall instead asked him about the special funds. Kemp deferred to the Department of Finance.</p>
<p>And this is where the boring but masterful doublespeak and obfuscation began.</p>
<p>The Department of Finance said they were fully concerned with the problem, had done an extensive review of all special funds in the state treasury, and were satisfied there are no other cases of misrepresentation.</p>
<p>Beall asked about special funds not accounted for inside of the state treasury.</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re trying to determine the best way to do that, the best solution that satisfies everybody,&#8221; the finance representative said.</p>
<p>&#8220;You comments are so vague,&#8221; Sen. Jim Nielsen, R-Gerber, added. &#8220;Your comments give me no comfort.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Our job is to make things work correctly  &#8212; we will do that,&#8221; Beall said.</p>
<p>Beall and Sen. Hannah-Beth Jackson, D-Santa Barbara, asked Kemp to let them know specifically, the information needed to deal appropriately with special fund issues. They each made it very clear that neither of them was going to be happy with surprises.</p>
<p>&#8220;What do we do to help you in working together, so we govern responsible,&#8221; Jackson asked.</p>
<p>&#8220;Be as open and transparent as possible,&#8221; the Natural Resources Assistant Secretary said. &#8220;So when we sit down and talk, we communicate openly.&#8221;</p>
<p>Clearly frustrated, Jackson said, &#8220;I guess that&#8217;s as good as I&#8217;m going to get today.&#8221;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/03/08/state-bureaucrats-get-surprise-smack-down-at-hearing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">38918</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>RT Brain Trust Rides Again</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/01/06/rt-brain-trust-rides-again/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CalWatchdog Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 20:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City of Sacramento]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katy Grimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Employee Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacramento]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacramento Regional Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bureaucrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax increases]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=25063</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Katy Grimes: The brain trust at Sacramento Regional Transit have bested themselves &#8211; they are now going to charge transit users for parking at some of Sacramento&#8217;s light rail stations.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Katy Grimes</em>: The brain trust at <a href="http://www.sacrt.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Sacramento Regional Transit</a> have bested themselves &#8211; they are now going to charge transit users for parking at some of Sacramento&#8217;s light rail stations. This is such a brilliant plan to send light rail users back to their cars, I wondered if a deep cover mole for Michelin tires, or BP Oil came up with it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/200px-Sac_RT_Siemens.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-25066" title="200px-Sac_RT_Siemens" src="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/200px-Sac_RT_Siemens.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="150" align="right" hspace="20" /></a></p>
<p>RT plans on charging a dollar a day for the privilege of parking and riding the crime-laden light rail trains. Or, riders can buy a $15 monthly parking pass.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like a $15-$20 monthly tax on light rail users. Why didn&#8217;t RT just increase fares on everyone?</p>
<p>&#8220;The idea is to make some additional revenue in areas where we won&#8217;t lose riders,&#8221; said agency facilities chief Mike Mattos, the Sacramento Bee <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2012/01/06/4166682/sacramento-regional-transit-will.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reported</a>.</p>
<p>Ah, it&#8217;s a revenue thing.</p>
<p>The riders who have cars are the folks making a socially conscious effort to use public transit, while trying to save a little money each month on downtown parking. Chances are that some will undoubtedly find the system no longer worth the effort. Particularly since auto break ins at the RT station parking lots are a regular occurrence.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.yelp.com/biz/sacramento-regional-transit-district-sacramento-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener">22 reviews</a> of Sacramento Regional Transit on <span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong><em><a href="http://www.yelp.com/biz/sacramento-regional-transit-district-sacramento-2" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="color: #0000ff;">yelp</span></a></em></strong></span> would be hilarious, if they weren&#8217;t so horrible. Most reviewers complained about the cost of $6 a day to ride anywhere, the habitually late buses,  angry, nasty bus and light rail operators, safety and security issues, filth, overcrowding on buses, worthless security guards, no late night operation, train breakdowns, and buses full of &#8220;people you only see in your nightmares.&#8221;</p>
<p>My favorite comment was, &#8220;I couldn&#8217;t take their shit anymore. I now pay to park downtown by my work even though I only live 20 blocks from my building. THAT is how much I hate RT.&#8221;</p>
<p>There is no mention in the <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2012/01/06/4166682/sacramento-regional-transit-will.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">story</a> about how many of the riders are subsidized. Welfare recipients are provided bus and light rail passes by the county. State, city and county employees receive a highly subsidized light rail pass.</p>
<p>A regular, full price monthly pass costs $100. State employees receive a $35 pass.</p>
<p>The hoodlums and thugs that ride the trains everyday for free, terrorizing other riders, are allowed to roam the system largely unchecked. Ask any regular light rail rider about the security and safety of the system, and they&#8217;ll snort out a laugh.</p>
<p>There have been numerous stories about the inefficiencies of Sacramento&#8217;s transit system. But probably the most eye-popping revelation was that on average, RT bus drivers and light rail operators work just 206 days a year. Regular, full-time employees work 260 days a year. That is 11 weeks off every year for the average transit driver.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see a calculation for the cost of this excessive time-off in just this one agency, as well as an explanation why. Vacations, workers compensation claims, sick days, paid leave, disability &#8211; California has created a nightmare employment situation.</p>
<p>The bureaucrats working at Regional transit should be required to take a basic economics class in order to understand that they are the ones killing the transit system. This decision to whittle more money from only one class of transit users is a classic example of the heedless California bureaucrat.</p>
<p>JAN. 6, 2012</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">25063</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-14 14:44:43 by W3 Total Cache
-->