<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>California governor race &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/california-governor-race/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 17:38:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>Gavin Newsom rips &#8216;defeatist Democrats&#8217; who won&#8217;t embrace single-payer</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2018/03/01/gavin-newsom-rips-defeatist-democrats-wont-embrace-single-payer/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2018/03/01/gavin-newsom-rips-defeatist-democrats-wont-embrace-single-payer/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Reed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 23:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[woefully incomplete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defeatist democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonio Villaraigosa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Nurses Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gavin Newsom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Rendon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single payer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 562]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California governor race]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=95740</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom appears comfortable with borrowing from Bernie Sanders’ playbook and embracing single-payer health care in his bid to succeed Gov. Jerry Brown in the June open primary]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-93618" src="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Gavin-Newsom-300x183.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="183" align="right" hspace="20" /></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom appears comfortable with borrowing from Bernie Sanders’ playbook and embracing single-payer health care in his bid to succeed Gov. Jerry Brown in the June open primary and the November general election.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">That’s a key takeaway of campaign watchers from the past month of the California gubernatorial campaign. Perhaps the signature moment: Newsom taunting </span><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/23/us/california-today-health-care-democrats.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">“defeatist Democrats”</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> in a San Diego debate last week – a clear shot at his main Democratic rivals, former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and state Treasurer John Chiang, who both support expanded state health care but are leery of single-payer’s potential cost.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The emergence of the former San Francisco mayor as an outspoken advocate of single-payer amounts to a triumph for the California Nurses Association, the leading champions of </span><a href="https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB562" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Senate Bill 562</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> – which commits the state to providing health care for all residents without providing key details on how that would be achieved. Despite the lack of details, the bill – known as the Healthy California Act and co-sponsored by Sens. Ricardo Lara, D-Bell Garden, and Toni Atkins, D-San Diego – passed the Senate on a 23-14 vote last June.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">But Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon, D-Paramount, incensed the nurses union later in June when he </span><a href="http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-assembly-speaker-calls-single-payer-1498261105-htmlstory.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">shelved </span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">the bill, declaring it “woefully incomplete.” Rendon cited its failure to identify how it would pay the estimated </span><a href="http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-first-fiscal-analysis-of-single-payer-1495475434-htmlstory.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">$400 billion</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> that SB562 would cost per year – more than triple the state’s general fund budget. He also faulted the measure for violating spending limits in the state Constitution and for not making the case on how California would get many needed federal waivers to proceed.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In January, Rendon repeated his criticisms, saying there had been </span><a href="http://www.capradio.org/articles/2018/01/08/assembly-speaker-says-single-payer-remains-shelved/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">no progress</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> in making SB562 into a serious legislative proposal.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">But with polls showing national Democrats consider single-payer health care a </span><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2017/09/30/politics/single-payer-democrats-support/index.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">high priority</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, Newsom is eager to take advantage of their enthusiasm. Yet while it may help him in the short term in the run-up to the June primary, it is unclear whether backing SB562 will be popular with the broad electorate in the long term.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A </span><a href="http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-single-payer-healthcare-is-popular-with-1496288584-htmlstory.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">May 2017 poll </span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">by the Public Policy Institute of California found that 65 percent of adults surveyed support single-payer health care – but that the number plunged to 43 percent when those being surveyed were told substantial new taxes would be needed. A </span><a href="http://www.capradio.org/articles/2017/09/27/poll-californians-back-obamacare-and-dreamers-but-not-single-payer/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">follow-up PPIC poll</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> in September found just 32 percent of likely state voters backed single-payer.</span></p>
<h3>Rendon recall bid fails without collecting a single signature</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Another sign that single-payer support may have its limits has been the collapse of an effort to recall Rendon that was launched last summer after he blocked the advance of SB562. The bid received national attention after an </span><a href="http://www.scpr.org/news/2017/08/05/74397/california-speaker-recall-effort-reflects-democrat/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Associated Press story </span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">depicted it as one more sign of how divided California Democrats had become.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">But the recall campaign unceremoniously ended in early February, with organizers saying they were now focused on defeating Rendon’s bid for re-election – not on recalling him. To force a recall vote, 23,000 petition signatures would have to be gathered. According to </span><a href="http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-recall-campaign-against-assembly-speaker-1518556675-htmlstory.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">the Los Angeles Times</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, the most recent official report on the recall campaign filed with the state showed no signatures had been gathered.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Public and private polls for months have generally shown Newsom to be leading Villaraigosa, with Chiang, former Superintendent of Public Instruction Delaine Eastin (a Democrat) and Republican candidates Travis Allen, a Huntington Beach assemblyman, and Rancho Santa Fe businessman John Cox substantially behind them. But the </span><a href="http://www.capradio.org/articles/2018/02/07/newsom-villaraigosa-emerge-from-pack-in-new-california-governor-poll/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">last poll by PPIC</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">, released Feb. 7, showed a statistical dead heat, with Newsom getting 23 percent and Villaraigosa 21 percent – within the poll’s margin of error.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2018/03/01/gavin-newsom-rips-defeatist-democrats-wont-embrace-single-payer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">95740</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democratic candidates for California governor reveal positions on single-payer health care and education</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2017/10/30/democratic-candidates-california-governor-reveal-positions-single-payer-health-care-education/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Reed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teacher tenure laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2018 governor race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gavin Newsom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Chiang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rolf Treu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vergara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delaine Eastin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonion Villaraigosa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California governor race]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=95126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The 2018 governor&#8217;s race got off to an informal start last week with candidate forums in Anaheim and San Francisco. Former San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom leads all gubernatorial candidates in]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><img decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-93663" src="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Gavin-newsom-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" align="right" hspace="20" /></span></p>
<p>The 2018 governor&#8217;s race got off to an informal start last week with <a href="https://ww2.kqed.org/news/2017/10/22/democratic-candidates-for-governor-split-on-single-payer-health-care/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">candidate </a><a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/10/24/democratic-candidates-for-governor-face-off-at-san-francisco-forum/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">forums </a>in Anaheim and San Francisco.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Former San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom leads all gubernatorial candidates in polling and fundraising. A September Berkeley IGS survey showed he had support from</span><a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/09/14/newsom-continues-lead-in-californias-2018-gubernatorial-primary/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;"> 26 percent </span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">of likely voters, followed by Republican businessman John Cox with 11 percent. In campaign finance filings from July, Newsom had $5.3 million in donations this year, state Treasurer John Chiang $2.6 million, Villaraigosa $2.3 million and former state Superintendent of Public Instruction Delaine Eastin just over $300,000. His fundraising advantage is even bigger when available funds from previous years are included, an August Los Angeles Times analysis </span><a href="http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-newsom-dominates-fundraising-in-1501617840-htmlstory.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">noted</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In the San Francisco forum moderated by Chronicle editorial-page editor John Diaz, Newsom showed why he was recently endorsed by the California Teachers Association. He declined to discuss the specifics of the <em>Vergara v. California</em> case, which pose difficult questions for social justice activists. In the lawsuit, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge found in 2014 that the state’s teacher job-protection laws were </span><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/11/us/california-teacher-tenure-laws-ruled-unconstitutional.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">unconstitutional</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> because they had led to schools in poor minority communities being much more likely to have ineffective teachers and much more likely to face major layoffs in years with budget cuts. An appellate court </span><a href="http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-court-rejects-bid-to-end-teacher-tenure-in-california-marking-huge-win-for-unions-20160414-story.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">threw out </span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">the trial court ruling.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Villaraigosa was the only Democratic candidate in the forums to support the <em>Vergara</em> plaintiffs, saying it had long been evident in Los Angeles that tenure and seniority laws hurt schools with heavy concentrations of English-language learners.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Newsom declared that the issues in the <em>Vergara</em> matter had been “litigated” and said that if tenure and seniority changes were needed, they could be collectively bargained. “In other words: They would not happen,” Diaz wrote tartly in his Chronicle </span><a href="https://www.pressreader.com/usa/san-francisco-chronicle/20171029/281659665297544" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">column </span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">about the forum. </span></p>
<h3>Worries about cost of single-payer dismissed as &#8216;specious&#8217;</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">On health care, all four Democrats support the concept of a single-payer system, the </span><a href="https://www.nationalnursesunited.org/press/unveiled-aeu-sb-562-healthy-california-act-path-comprehensive-coverage-all-californians" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">biggest issue</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> of the California Nurses Association, which </span><a href="http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-ca-gavin-newsom-california-nurses-association-20151202-story.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">endorsed </span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">Newsom nearly a year ago. But while Villaraigosa and Chiang have said California needs to figure out how to pay for such a system, Newsom says concerns about cost are </span><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Democratic-governor-hopefuls-take-on-single-payer-12303473.php" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">“the most specious argument”</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> against a state health-care-for-all system. Senate Bill 562, a bill committing the state to single-payer, passed the Senate earlier this year but stalled in the Assembly after estimates that its annual cost could be </span><a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/05/22/healthy-california-act-annual-price-tag-400-billion/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">$400 billion</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> – more than double the entire state budget.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">If Newsom and Villaraigosa finish first and second in the June “top two” primary and give voters a choice between two Democrats in November 2018 – as happened in California’s 2016 U.S. Senate race – teacher tenure/seniority laws and how to adopt and pay for single-payer could dominate the general election fight.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In the forums, there was little difference between the two men on other top issues. Both agreed with the need to build </span><a href="http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-newsom-calls-for-california-to-nearly-1508790304-htmlstory.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">millions </span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">of new housing units, to resist Trump administration immigration policies and to provide much more money to public schools.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">There is a possibility other prominent Democrats might get in the race. The filing deadline for the </span><a href="http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/upcoming-elections/statewide-direct-primary-june-5-2018/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">June 5 primary</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> isn’t until March 9, and there has been </span><a href="http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-los-angeles-mayor-eric-garcetti-plays-1507669630-htmlstory.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">speculation</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> that Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti might jump in. But Sunday, Garcetti said on </span><a href="https://twitter.com/ericgarcetti/status/924747987288387584?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Twitter</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> that he was definitely not going to run for governor.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">95126</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-20 17:19:00 by W3 Total Cache
-->