<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chino Hills &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/chino-hills/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:23:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>Chino Hills wins battle against So Cal Edison</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/07/12/chino-hills-wins-battle-against-sc-edison/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/07/12/chino-hills-wins-battle-against-sc-edison/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CalWatchdog Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Inside Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Public Utilities Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chino Hills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hope For The Hills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katy Grimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern California Edison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=45741</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[July 12, 2013 By Katy Grimes Chino Hills will be waving bye-bye to the 200 foot electrical transmission towers erected near homes, schools and churches in the lovely bedroom community.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>July 12, 2013</p>
<p>By Katy Grimes</p>
<p><a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2013/07/12/chino-hills-wins-battle-against-sc-edison/381586_2626538392415_1523966093_2831509_1169710189_n-167x300/" rel="attachment wp-att-45742"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-45742" alt="381586_2626538392415_1523966093_2831509_1169710189_n-167x300" src="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/381586_2626538392415_1523966093_2831509_1169710189_n-167x300.jpg" width="167" height="300" align="right" hspace="20" /></a></p>
<p>Chino Hills will be waving bye-bye to the 200 foot electrical transmission towers erected near homes, schools and churches in the lovely bedroom community.</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">Yesterday the Southern California city won a long and arduous battle against utility giant </span><a style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;" href="https://www.sce.com/wps/portal/home/!ut/p/b1/04_Sj9CPykssy0xPLMnMz0vMAfGjzOIt3Q1cPbz8DTzdQwKNDTyNAw38gh0djQ0MzIAKIoEKDHAARwNC-sP1o8BK8Jjg55Gfm6pfkBthoOuoqAgAgIrzaA!!/dl4/d5/L2dBISEvZ0FBIS9nQSEh/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Southern California Edison</a><span style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 19px;">. A group of dedicated, committed and faithful citizens proved that the voting public still has a voice, but only as long as it is willing to put forth the effort.</span></p>
<div title="Page 1">
<p>After several years of legal challenges, the <a href="http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/puc/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">California Public Utilities Commission</a> issued a final decision in the <a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2011/11/16/chino-hills-fights-monster-electric-towers/" target="_blank">Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project, </a>which grants the City of Chino Hills its proposal to run new electrical transmission lines underground.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hopeforthehills.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Hope for the Hills</a>, the group of Chino Hills residents created to officially fight SCE on the Tehachapi transmission towers project, demonstrated amazing strength in its battle to win back their rights and their neighborhoods.</p>
<h3>The monster towers</h3>
<p>A couple of years ago, residents of Chino Hills came home from work one day to find monster 200-foot electrical towers suddenly being erected inside parks and only feet from homes and area churches. Outraged, knowing this would never happen in Malibu, Beverly Hills or San Francisco’s Pacific Heights neighborhood, a small group made immediate phone calls and did some initial research. They found it was SCE&#8217;s Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project, which would construct renewable energy generators from Kern County to western San Bernardino County. The project has been funded by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, also known as President Obama’s “stimulus money” for “shovel-ready” projects.</p>
<p>In October 2010, <a href="http://www.sce.com/PowerandEnvironment/Transmission/CurrentProjects/TRTP4-11/approval.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">SCE</a> contractors began removing old, 200-<a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/kilovolt" target="_blank" rel="noopener">kilovolt</a> (kV) transmission lines which had been idle for several decades, and installing new, beefier, taller, 500 kV transmission lines. By May 2011, new towers were being erected. The old towers had been located on an easement, and had not been used in 40 years. SCE had assured developers that the old electrical towers were only still there as backup electricity in an emergency.</p>
<p>But suddenly the old towers were removed, and new, much larger towers were rapidly being installed &#8212; right in the backyards of some Chino Hills residents.</p>
<h3>The battle</h3>
<p>Today&#8217;s big win didn&#8217;t happen overnight, or without unbelievable <a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2011/11/16/chino-hills-fights-monster-electric-towers/#sthash.KziupA51.dpuf" target="_blank">organization, commitment and faith</a> by Chino Hills residents. The <a href="http://www.hopeforthehills.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Hope for the Hills website </a>has hundreds of photos showing the devastation to the city because of the monster towers already erected.</p>
<p>Together with the City of Chino Hills, the residents <a href="http://www.chinohills.org/archives/48/PR09-066%20City%20Submits%20Written%20Testimony%20to%20CPUC.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">proposed</a> various alternate routes that would move the transmission lines away from residential communities and schools into a local state park area.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.chinohills.org/index.aspx?nid=1000" target="_blank" rel="noopener">city spent $4.6 million on experts</a>, lawyers and specialty engineers to <a href="http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/published/proceedings/A0706031.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">fight</a> SCE to develop an alternate route through the Chino Hills State Park, a plan blessed by environmentalists.</p>
<p>The alternate route plan was initially rebuffed by the CPUC. But in November 2011, Chino Hills received word that the CPUC had ordered SCE to halt work on the project, and to come up with alternate route proposals by January 10, 2012. This came after the Chino Hills City Council voted to file a request with the California Supreme Court to accept review of the Court of Appeal’s ruling against Chino Hills.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2013/07/12/chino-hills-wins-battle-against-sc-edison/img_0127-225x300/" rel="attachment wp-att-45743"><img decoding="async" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-45743" alt="IMG_0127-225x300" src="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/IMG_0127-225x300.jpg" width="225" height="300" align="right" hspace="20" /></a></p>
<h3>There&#8217;s hope in them thar hills</h3>
<p>In fall 2011, I traveled to Chino Hills to see the towers for myself. I was shocked at what this residential community was being told they had to live with. That&#8217;s when I took the pictures in this story.</p>
<p>I met <a href="http://www.hopeforthehills.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Hope for the Hills </a>President Bob Goodwin and several of the Hope for the Hills faithful. During a tour of the city to see the towers, Goodwin and the group showed me parks and schools, as well as the residential  areas dwarfed by the monster towers. Goodwin and I walked up to one of the towers and posed for a photo (below).</p>
<p>He told me Chino Hills was a city people wanted to live in. “Homes were still in demand, even under the current economic downturn. Prices in Chino Hills remained fairly stable. But now we have the monster poles adjacent to our schools, churches and in parks.”</p>
<p>Goodwin said that the number of homes for sale in Chino Hills jumped 400 percent once the towers began to sprout up.</p>
<h3>The CPUC decision</h3>
<p>&#8220;The Decision, approved by a 3-2 vote, states that the burden imposed on Chino Hills by the overhead lines is unfair and contrary to community values,&#8221; the <a href="http://www.chinohills.org/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=898" target="_blank" rel="noopener">City of Chino Hills</a> posted on its <a href="http://www.chinohills.org/CivicAlerts.aspx?AID=898" target="_blank" rel="noopener">website</a> today. &#8220;Accordingly, the Decision orders removal of the towers already built in the 3.5 mile section of the TRTP right of way in Chino Hills and orders Southern California Edison to complete the project by constructing a single circuit, two cable per phase underground XLPE cable in place of the overhead lines.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2013/07/12/chino-hills-wins-battle-against-sc-edison/381077_244017178986097_100001334492035_598609_1607539365_n-225x300/" rel="attachment wp-att-45746"><img decoding="async" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-45746" alt="381077_244017178986097_100001334492035_598609_1607539365_n-225x300" src="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/381077_244017178986097_100001334492035_598609_1607539365_n-225x300.jpg" width="225" height="300" align="right" hspace="20" /></a></p>
<p>Back when I first learned of the towers, the more I researched the SCE project, the more it became obvious it was a product of the passage of the <a href="http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUC/energy/Renewables/index.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">California Renewable Portfolio Standard</a> by the state Legislature. It then was signed into law by Gov. Jerry Brown.</p>
<p>The 2011 <a href="http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUC/energy/Renewables/index.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CRPS</a> mandated that 33 percent of electricity generated in the state by 2020 must be from renewable energy.</p>
<p>That means sellers of electricity must procure 33 percent of their total energy supplies from <a href="http://www.energy.ca.gov/2010publications/CEC-300-2010-007/CEC-300-2010-007-CMF.PDF" target="_blank" rel="noopener">certified renewable resources</a>.</p>
<p>This project was one way to capture <a href="http://www.recovery.gov/Pages/default.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener">federal stimulus money</a> while looking like heroes to the environmentalist crowd by promoting renewables. (Although some environmentalists objected to the power lines themselves.)</p>
<p>The game is to grab as many federal dollars as possible, regardless of what strings come attached to them. This explained the speed with which the towers went up. It was largely due to having to spend the federal money by a certain deadline, regardless of the pending legal battles.</p>
<p>It was obvious that SCE circumvented many procedures to get the electrical towers project going so quickly. They were even shut down at one point by OSHA for safety violations, and the by Federal Aviation Administration for airspace infringement because of the height of the tall towers.</p>
<p>Today, the Hope for the Hills <a href="http://www.hopeforthehills.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener">website message</a> says, &#8220;Together we made a difference.&#8221;</p>
<div title="Page 2">
<p>The <a href="http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/PublishedDocs/Published/G000/M071/K423/71423831.PDF" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Alternate Proposed Decision</a> the CPUC voted on today is available <a href="http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/PublishedDocs/Published/G000/M071/K423/71423831.PDF" target="_blank" rel="noopener">HERE</a>.</p>
<p>Read my main story on Chino Hills <a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2011/11/16/chino-hills-fights-monster-electric-towers/" target="_blank">HERE</a>, and a full listing of CalWatchdog.com stories <a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/tag/chino-hills/" target="_blank">HERE</a>.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/07/12/chino-hills-wins-battle-against-sc-edison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">45741</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chino Hills in the news again</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/04/23/chino-hills-in-the-news-again/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/04/23/chino-hills-in-the-news-again/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CalWatchdog Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights and Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chino Hills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax increases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tehachapi Transmission Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AB 32]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hope For The Hills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katy Grimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Employee Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California High-Speed Rail Authority]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=27934</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[April 23, 2012 By Katy Grimes Following up the many stories I&#8217;ve done on the Southern California Edison Tehachapi Transmission Renewable Energy Project is a very important bill in the]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>April 23, 2012</p>
<p>By Katy Grimes</p>
<p>Following up the <a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/?s=monster+towers" target="_blank">many stories</a> I&#8217;ve done on the <a href="http://www.sce.com/PowerandEnvironment/Renewables/Wind/default.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Southern California Edison Tehachapi Transmission Renewable Energy Project</a> is a very important bill in the Utilities and Commerce committee today.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aroundthecapitol.com/billtrack/analysis.html?aid=242076" target="_blank" rel="noopener">AB 2235</a> by Assemblyman Curt Hagman, R-Chino, would  authorize a property owner to seek compensation for any substantial reduction in property value proximately resulting from the building, expansion, or operation of a plant, line, pipeline, or other facility by a public utility.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/maple2.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignright size-full wp-image-27935" title="maple2" src="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/maple2.jpg" alt="" width="482" height="720" align="right" hspace="20" /></a></p>
<p>Why is this bill necessary? Because SCE has run roughshod over the residential communities in Chino Hills and built a string of 200 foot electrical transmission towers close to the homes.  In addition to the housing crash in California, the homes in the lovely residential areas through Chino Hills have dropped in value substantially thanks to the ugly landscape which was not there when the homes were built, sold by developers and purchased by residents.</p>
<p>According to the author, &#8220;when public utilities act as bad neighbors in a community, citizens should have the ability to seek redress.&#8221;</p>
<p>Previously I wrote:</p>
<p><em>In October 2010, <a href="http://www.sce.com/PowerandEnvironment/Transmission/CurrentProjects/TRTP4-11/approval.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Southern California Edison</a> (SCE) contractors began removing the old, mostly idle, 200 <a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/kilovolt" target="_blank" rel="noopener">kilovolt</a> (kV) transmission lines from an easement running through Chino Hills, and immediately began installation of the new, 200 foot towers,with 500 kV transmission lines. Residents immediately contacted SCE worried that the power towers were too close to homes, and concerned about living so closely to beefed-up electro-magnetic frequencies and radiation.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/IMG_0127.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignright size-full wp-image-27938" title="IMG_0127" src="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/IMG_0127.jpg" alt="" width="720" height="960" align="right" hspace="20" /></a></p>
<p><em>The Chino Hills residents have been persistent in their quest. Despite many setbacks and legal decisions rendered in the utility’s favor, as well as a few wins for the community, the <a href="http://www.hopeforthehills.org/News_and_links.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Hope For the Hills </a>crew has functioned entirely as a grassroots operation with no outside funding, no union backup, and no political help. The only help they’ve had has been from the city of Chino Hills, which has spent $2 million on legal fees for its own fight against SCE over the towers. The residents have waged the fight with sheer willpower and determination, and with a love of community rarely seen these days.</em></p>
<p><em>This is no whining group of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NIMBY" target="_blank" rel="noopener">NIMBYs</a>. In October, I traveled to Chino Hills to see for myself just how bad the situation was. I had seen photos of the monster towers. I had written stories of the resident’s plight. I followed the hearings, and read the legal documents. I knew it was bad, but I didn’t know how bad.</em></p>
<p><em>When I stood at the base of the electrical towers just outside of Joanne’s home, and near the monster tower erected in the middle of the nearby city park where kids were playing soccer, and on top of a hill in a lovely residential development, I was stunned and disgusted.</em></p>
<p><em>Members of Hope For The Hills report that they have been told by several SCE insiders that the utility agreed long ago to build the towers, and have no intention of altering the plan. Some say that there was a contract signed with a cellular company for use of the towers. Others says that because the California Renewable Energy Portfolio was passed and signed into law by Gov. Jerry Brown, no California officials are going to help stop it. And others report that the project has been partially funded with federal stimulus money, which SCE doesn’t want to return.</em></p>
<p><em>The Tehachapi Transmission Project feels similar to the High-Speed Rail project. Despite the outrageous and increasing costs, lack of ridership, ongoing long-term debt, California officials seem unable to stop it.</em></p>
<h3>Fighting the good fight</h3>
<p>The group of residents tirelessly fighting SCE is purely grassroots, and they are a group of contenders. They have taken on the California Public Utilities Commission, and SCE with no resources other than their determination to save their community. And they are not NIMBY&#8217;s. <a href="http://www.hopeforthehills.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Hope For The Hills</a>, together with the <a href="http://www.chinohills.org/index.aspx?nid=737" target="_blank" rel="noopener">City of Chino Hills</a>, worked with attorneys and planners to come up with several <a href="http://www.hopeforthehills.org/Alternatives.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">alternative plans</a>. So far, there have been a few compromises, but not enough.</p>
<p>However, HFTH has the attention of Congressman Ed Royce, R-40th District, California.</p>
<div id="ctl00_HeaderPlaceholder_ctl08_UpdatePanel">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p>Royce is on the House Committee on Financial Services Subcommittee on Insurance, Housing. On April 14, the subcommittee held a Congressional hearing in the Chino Hills City Council Chambers on “The impact of overhead high voltage transmission towers and lines on eligibility for Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insured mortgage programs.”</p>
<p>Approximately 450 &#8211; 500 people attended.</p>
<p>For more information, the <a href="http://www.chinohills.org/index.aspx?nid=737" target="_blank" rel="noopener">City of Chino Hills</a> has a fantastic overview of the entire project.  And of course, the <a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/?s=monster+towers" target="_blank">many stories </a>I have done provide a <a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/?s=monster+towers" target="_blank">history</a>.</p>
<p>I will follow up on the results of today&#8217;s hearing.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/04/23/chino-hills-in-the-news-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">27934</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chino Hills Anxious For PUC Decision</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/01/03/chino-hills-anxious-for-puc-decision/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/01/03/chino-hills-anxious-for-puc-decision/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CalWatchdog Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights and Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern California Edison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Public Utilities Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chino Hills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katy Grimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Salazar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PUC]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=24974</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Katy Grimes: The City of Chino Hills is gearing up for the next big battle in its fight with the Public Utility Commission and Southern California Edison over the Tehachapi]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Katy Grimes</em>: The City of Chino Hills is gearing up for the next big battle in its fight with the Public Utility Commission and Southern California Edison over the <a href="http://www.sce.com/PowerandEnvironment/Transmission/CurrentProjects/TRTP1-3/default.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project </a>in Chino Hills &#8211; 200 foot electrical transmission towers that have been installed close to homes, and now next to businesses, throughout the community.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/405844_270109713043510_100001334492035_661623_1859222002_n.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-24975" title="405844_270109713043510_100001334492035_661623_1859222002_n" src="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/405844_270109713043510_100001334492035_661623_1859222002_n.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="320" align="right" hspace="20" /></a></p>
<p>In November, after several years of legal battles with the city of Chino Hills, Southern California Edison was ordered by the CPUC to provide alternatives to their <a href="http://www.sce.com/PowerandEnvironment/Transmission/CurrentProjects/TRTP1-3/default.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project </a>located in Chino Hills. SCE has until January 10 to provide the alternatives to the CPUC.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, on Dec. 22, Chino Hills received word that the California Supreme Court denied the City&#8217;s petition for review of a Sept. 12 Court of Appeal&#8217;s decision in a property rights case against SCE.</p>
<p>Still, <a href="http://www.hopeforthehills.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Hope for the Hills</a> presses on to get the towers moved into the state park, instead of running through the city&#8217;s neighborhoods.</p>
<p><strong>No NIMBY&#8217;s</strong></p>
<p>This is not just a case of &#8216;not in my backyard.&#8217; Nowhere in the country has any utility installed 200 foot tall, 60ft wide towers, energized with multiple 500,000 volt power lines near residential communities. The monster towers are erected so close to homes, that Chino Hills residents are fearful of potential damage and health risks from the massive electricity lines.</p>
<p>And, there can be no doubt that property values have dropped because of the ugly monster towers looming up from behind backyard swing sets, over the tops of swimming pools, and against the rolling hills of the bedroom community.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/260343_217912011562739_100000318252742_778385_3680754_n.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-24980" title="260343_217912011562739_100000318252742_778385_3680754_n" src="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/260343_217912011562739_100000318252742_778385_3680754_n.jpg" alt="" width="720" height="540" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Stop-SCE-Power-Lines-in-Chino-Hills/177745945614678" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Hope For the Hills</a> President Bob Goodwin said today that he is anxious about the upcoming CPUC decision because it has been &#8220;eerily quiet&#8221; lately.</p>
<p>Goodwin also said that the CPUC recently ordered all of its commissioners to travel to Chino Hills for meetings, and to see the towers first hand. However, despite other stakeholders attending the meetings, no city representatives were included.</p>
<p>&#8220;Michael Peevey and Paul Clanon from the CPUC, the State Parks people, and Aerojet attorneys and representatives were there, but the City Manager said no city representatives were there,&#8221; Goodwin said. &#8220;And, there was no follow-up or debriefing with the city.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/283863_1812951536264_1614322014_1457620_3322408_n.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-24979" title="283863_1812951536264_1614322014_1457620_3322408_n" src="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/283863_1812951536264_1614322014_1457620_3322408_n.jpg" alt="" width="720" height="540" /></a></p>
<p>The January 10 decision has everyone in Chino Hills holding a collective breath. But they have not been idle during the holidays. The group has sent many letters to Gov. Jerry Brown for emergency involvement, but to no avail. Residents say they are frustrated because the governor has not done a thing, other than send form letter responses to their correspondence. The most recent response letter from the governor said:</p>
<p><em>Thank you for writing to Governor Brown regarding the Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project. The Governor is committed to improving California and greatly appreciates your input. Participation by the people represents an important component of our state. It is people like you, who take the time to communicate ideas and present solutions to the Governor, that contribute to the innovation for which our great state is known. </em></p>
<p><em>Unfortunately, due to the many demands on the Governor&#8217;s schedule, he is unable to tour the site of the Tehachapi Project. However, we do encourage you to share your suggestions with the California Public Utilities Commission. You may contact the Commission directly at: Public Utilities Commission, 505 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102; (415) 703-2782 &#8211; Again, thank you for taking the time to write to Governor Brown. </em><br />
<em>Sincerely, </em><br />
<em>Constituent Affairs</em><br />
<em>Office of Governor Jerry Brown</em></p>
<p>After fighting the CPUC for several years, one resident replied, &#8220;What a crack-up! Giving us the CPUC information. What a joke. Thanks Gov. Brown. For nothing.&#8221;</p>
<p><em>read all of CalWatchdog&#8217;s stories about the <a href="http://www.sce.com/PowerandEnvironment/Transmission/CurrentProjects/TRTP1-3/default.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project</a> including:</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2011/11/16/chino-hills-fights-monster-electric-towers/" target="_blank"> Chino Hills Fights Monster Electric Towers</a>; <a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2011/11/10/chino-hills-wins-battle-against-utility/" target="_blank">Chino Hills Wins Battle Against SCE</a>; <a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2011/10/21/faa-halts-electrical-tower-project/" target="_blank">FAA Halts Electrical Tower Project</a>; <a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2011/08/18/chino-hills-monster-towers/" target="_blank">Chino Hills Monster Towers</a>; <a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2011/07/20/green-power-project-jolts-citizens/" target="_blank">Green Power Project Jolts Citizens</a></p>
<p>JAN. 3, 2012</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/01/03/chino-hills-anxious-for-puc-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">24974</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green Power Project Jolts Citizens</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2011/07/20/green-power-project-jolts-citizens/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2011/07/20/green-power-project-jolts-citizens/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CalWatchdog Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern California Edison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arnold Schwarzenegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Public Utilities Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chino Hills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katy Grimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Salazar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCE]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=20185</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[JULY 20, 2011 By KATY GRIMES In the Southern California city of Chino Hills, there is a palpable anger spreading as the landscape is changing from bedroom community to industrial]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Power-lines-Windmills-California.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignright size-full wp-image-20437" title="Power lines - Windmills - California" src="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Power-lines-Windmills-California.jpg" alt="" width="295" height="220" align="right" hspace="20" /></a>JULY 20, 2011</p>
<p>By KATY GRIMES</p>
<p>In the Southern California city of Chino Hills, there is a palpable anger spreading as the landscape is changing from bedroom community to industrial park. The bedroom community landscape now includes 200-foot electrical towers near homes, churches and parks.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.sce.com/PowerandEnvironment/Transmission/CurrentProjects/TRTP4-11/tehachapi-4-11.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project</a> has had many of the 76,000 Chino Hills residents up in arms, but they are now left feeling impotent against one of the largest power providers in the state. Residents are watching helplessly as the installation of new massive electricity towers &#8212;  200 feet tall and 60 feet wide &#8212; are erected quickly, as close as 40 feet from some residents’ backyards.</p>
<p>Southern California Edison’s Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project will cost a total of $1.8 billion in order to access and construct renewable energy generators from Kern County to western San Bernardino County. The City of Chino Hills has <a href="http://www.chinohills.org/archives/48/PR09-066%20City%20Submits%20Written%20Testimony%20to%20CPUC.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">proposed</a> various alternate routes that would move the transmission lines away from residential communities and schools into a local state park area, but were rebuffed by the California Public Utility Commission.</p>
<p>The state&#8217;s “green” agenda is behind the push for the 173 miles of new, high-voltage transmission lines and other &#8220;renewable&#8221; energy power projects. And apparently, some energy projects have been accelerated because of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Recovery_and_Reinvestment_Act_of_2009" target="_blank" rel="noopener">American Recovery and Reinvestment Act</a> money &#8212; federal stimulus money for &#8220;shovel-ready&#8221; projects.</p>
<p>Proponents have argued that California&#8217;s grid must be updated to be able to carry renewable energy throughout the state as mandated by the Legislature. But, as energy experts have testified around the country, there is no reason why new transmission lines would necessarily carry more or cleaner power as solar and wind power have proven to be unreliable. The cheapest, most abundant power remains coal, which is likely to continue powering the bulk of California&#8217;s electricity.</p>
<h3><strong>Renewable Energy Mandate</strong></h3>
<p>The Tehachapi project is under construction in response to the <a href="http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUC/energy/Renewables/index.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>California Renewable Portfolio Standard</strong></a>, which was mandated by the Legislature and signed into law on April 12, 2011 by Gov. Jerry Brown. Sen. Joe Simitian, D-Palo Alto, authored <a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sbx1_2_bill_20110412_chaptered.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">SB 2</a>, which mandates the increase of California’s Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) to 33 percent by 2020. The mandate requires regulated sellers of electricity to procure 33 percent of their total energy supplies from <a href="http://www.energy.ca.gov/2010publications/CEC-300-2010-007/CEC-300-2010-007-CMF.PDF" target="_blank" rel="noopener">certified renewable resources</a>.</p>
<p>Opponents of the renewable mandate say that this will increase California’s energy costs by $7 billion, sparking a dramatic increase in the cost to the state’s utility rate payers.</p>
<p>In 2009, the California Public Utilities Commission <a href="http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/NR/rdonlyres/B5EAD4C2-1683-4915-A76C-CC4750543FB5/0/LEGISLATIVESUMMARY2009FINAL091113.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>warned</strong></a> the Legislature that increasing the renewables standard would cost utility companies in the state “tens of billions of dollars” and boost electricity costs to ratepayers. In its 2009 Legislative Summary, the CPUC wrote about Democratic Sen. Joe Simitian’s previous bill, SB 14, “[A]s drafted this measure would make it more difficult and costly to achieve this very important goal,” and it “adds new regulatory hurdles to permitting renewable resources in the state, at the same time limiting the importation of cost-effective renewable energy from other states in the West.”</p>
<p>Unfortunately, once the RPS bill was signed into law, all bets were off and energy producers have no choice but to comply &#8212; and ratepayers no choice but to pay.</p>
<p>Singing a contrasting tune to the 2009 report to the Legislature, on March 14 2011 CPUC President <a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2011/03/16/missed-opportunity-with-the-cpuc/">Michael Peevey told a legislative committee</a> that the CPUC is continuing to push on the renewable standard. He added, “I think the state can go to 40 percent renewables by 2020.”</p>
<p>And now Chino Hills appears to be the sacrificial energy lamb.</p>
<p>In October 2010, <a href="http://www.sce.com/PowerandEnvironment/Transmission/CurrentProjects/TRTP4-11/approval.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Southern California Edison</a> (SCE) contractors began removing the old, mostly idle, 200 <a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/kilovolt" target="_blank" rel="noopener">kilovolt</a> (kV) transmission lines and installing new, beefier, 500 kV transmission lines. But many residents have been complaining that the power towers are too close to homes and worry about living so closely to electro-magnetic frequencies and radiation.</p>
<h3><strong><a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Power-lines-kids.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignright size-full wp-image-20438" title="Power lines -kids" src="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Power-lines-kids.jpg" alt="" width="111" height="166" align="right" hspace="20" /></a>Southern California Edison Project</strong></h3>
<p>The <a href="http://www.sce.com/PowerandEnvironment/Transmission/CurrentProjects/TRTP4-11/project-application.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">application</a> for the Tehachapi project was filed in 2007 and approved in 2009. During the ensuing years, the PUC held public hearings.</p>
<p>Residents who attended the public hearings explained that at the heart of the issue is the easement route now being accessed by SCE.  The easements and existing towers had been  inactive for 40 years.</p>
<p>SCE is now building on the easement route that has legally been their right-of-way for many decades, even before any homes were built. However, the old lines and towers on the Chino Hills easement were standard in size and voltage, but have been inactive for the past 40 years.</p>
<p>Most residents with historical knowledge of the area said there was a common belief that SCE did not have plans ever to use the easement or old power lines &#8212; until the Tehachapi project.</p>
<p>Where this belief becomes reality is that in the ensuing 40 years, communities and homes were built around the inactive easement, all with the appropriate approval and permits issued by the County of San Bernardino.</p>
<p>Several residents indicated it was widely assumed that any future energy upgrades would include standard sized towers previously used, along with &#8220;standard&#8221; voltage.  Residents said that they never imagined the 200-foot tall, 500 kV towers  now part of the 150-foot easement.</p>
<p>The residents of Chino Hills said they have only been asking for an alternative route and more time to develop a better and safer plan. Given that Chino hills spent $2.4 million on experts, lawyers and specialty engineers to <a href="http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/published/proceedings/A0706031.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">fight</a> SCE to develop an alternate route through the Chino Hills State Park &#8212; approved by environmentalists and other agencies &#8212; they felt would get attention from the CPUC.</p>
<p>However, the CPUC has summarily dismissed the concerns of the residents over the interest of visitors to the local state park. This excerpt from CPUC&#8217;s Final <a href="ftp://ftp.cpuc.ca.gov/gopher-data/environ/tehachapi_renewables/TRTP.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Decision</a> for the project is one of the stated reasons why they dismissed Chino Hills&#8217; alternate routes through the Chino Hills State Park:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>“The Chino Hills State Park is an important regional resource serving at least 97,000 visitors each year. One key purpose of parklands is to serve ‘as a natural respite for the area’s human inhabitants,’ which clearly heightens the importance of visual impacts. Hence, visitors to parks would be more greatly impacted by visual impacts than similarly situated residents, and there are more visitors to the CHSP than there are residents of Chino Hills.”</em></p>
<p>The CPUC showed blatant disregard for the permanent residents of Chino Hills in favor of occasional visitors to the state park. Denise Cattern, Public Information Officer for the City of Chino Hills, said it was the residents who lobbied for the state park. and use it extensively.</p>
<h3><strong>Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project</strong></h3>
<p>Upon completion, SCE says the Tehachapi Renewable Transmission Project will provide renewable wind-generated electricity and help meet California’s renewable energy goals.</p>
<p>However, even while SCE was shepherding the project through the tedious environmental-impact process, residents protested and appealed the PUC’S  decisions to allow SCE to install the 500kV High Voltage Power Lines so close to homes and parks.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Statue-of-Liberty-electricity.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignright size-full wp-image-20439" title="Statue of Liberty - electricity" src="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Statue-of-Liberty-electricity.jpg" alt="" width="141" height="166" align="right" hspace="20" /></a>“They are 200 feet tall &#8212; higher than the Statue of Liberty &#8212; and are placed next to people&#8217;s homes,” Chino Hills resident Irene Udo said in a recent interview. “We are the only city in the USA to have this type of power line running through residential homes.” And Udo expressed the concern held by many in the city about electromagnetic fields. &#8220;The EMF research is quite powerful,&#8221; she said.</p>
<p>Despite public hearings, residents said the &#8220;Tehachapi Clean Energy Project&#8221; was jammed down their throats by the PUC and SCE, with blanket <a href="http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/published/News_release/65628.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">approval</a> of each phase of the project. Residents as well as city officials I spoke with said the CPUC and SCE were in lockstep about the scope and direction of the project from the inception, leaving residents to feel that even the public hearing process was just a formality.</p>
<p>SCE Public Information Officer Paul Klein said, “SCE has been a leader in renewable energy” and already generates 19 percent of the energy it produces from renewable sources. “We are already ahead in the renewable area.” Klein explained that the Tehachapi project includes 173 miles of new transmission lines with the goal of providing 4,500 megawatts of renewable electricity generation. &#8220;Renewable  energy has to be addressed,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>The city of Chino Hills has fought SCE over the increase in size of the towers as well as the 150-foot easement grandfathered into their city. “Outside of Chino Hills, throughout the rest of the project the easement is 250 feet,” said Cattern. “And 500 kV is not typical. It’s a crazy amount of high voltage for a residential area.” Cattern emphasized, “This isn’t just ‘I don’t want power lines in my backyard.’”</p>
<p>Cattern said that <a href="http://www.chinohills.org/index.aspx?nid=737" target="_blank" rel="noopener">the city</a> has spent $2.4 million trying to get the PUC to require SCE to honor a 250-foot easement or re-routing the line, as well as questioning the high voltage. And the city has made numerous alternative <a href="http://www.chinohills.org/DocumentView.aspx?DID=921" target="_blank" rel="noopener">proposals</a> for the project.</p>
<p>For clarification, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_power_transmission" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Wikipedia</a> states, “Electric power transmission or &#8216;high voltage electric transmission&#8217; is the bulk transfer of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_energy" target="_blank" rel="noopener">electrical energy</a>, from generating <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_plant" target="_blank" rel="noopener">power plants</a> to substations located near population centers. This is distinct from the local wiring between high voltage substations and customers, which is typically referred to as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_power_distribution" target="_blank" rel="noopener">electric power distribution</a>. Transmission lines, when interconnected with each other, become high voltage transmission networks.&#8221;</p>
<h3>Energy Experts</h3>
<p>Chino Hills hired energy and electricity experts to testify on behalf of the residents of the city at the CPUC hearings. During testimony, experts said SCE “significantly understated the potential maximum levels of the electric and magnetic fields along Segment 8A.”</p>
<p>California State University Sacramento Transmission Engineering Professor Turan Gonen told the CPUC, “To arrive at its calculation of magnetic fields at the edge of the right of way, SCE estimated the magnetic fields from the proposed line based only upon the initial amount of electricity the lines are expected to carry in the near future. But the capacity of the lines is actually four times higher than the value SCE assumed in calculating the magnetic field.&#8221;</p>
<p>Gonen warned that, as demand grows for electricity in Southern California, the transmission lines will likely carry electricity at their capacity. “The result is that the people living next to the lines in Chino Hills, as well as those in Chino and Ontario, could be exposed to magnetic fields as high as 110 mG […] on a temporary or sustained basis rather than the 27 mG estimated by SCE.”</p>
<p>The other issue is the 150-foot easement. “Throughout the 173-mile TRTP project, the only segment with such a narrow 150-foot ROW (right of way) is the segment through Chino Hills, Chino and Ontario that includes the 3.5 miles of densely populated neighborhoods in Chino Hills, Gonen said and wrote in testimony to the PUC. And SCE admits that there is only one example in the United States where homes abut double-circuit 500 kV lines in a 150-foot right of way. In that case, the property owners had a choice about living next to the lines because the lines were there first &#8212; this is not the case in Chino Hills.”</p>
<p>SCE’s Klein said they went through “a very long and thorough review process by the PUC,” and “there was extensive public access.” According to SCE, “Thousands of residents were contacted by SCE and the CPUC about the five to seven miles of line going through Chino Hills.”</p>
<p>It appears that there was a long review process. However, nothing changed for Chino Hills. They are still left with the installation of the 200-foot electrical towers and high capacity power lines next to homes.</p>
<p>According to Chino Hills residents, conflicting information has not been resolved. &#8220;Why are they not allowed to build these power poles within 300 yards of a school (250 kV lines), but yet they can put 500 kV lines directly over our homes?&#8221; one resident sent in an email. &#8220;You can&#8217;t even have a pacemaker and be near one of these things, and it&#8217;s been proven that florescent bulbs will light up&#8221; if held near a tower. &#8220;People are writing us from Europe saying the only places these 500 kV lines are being allowed is in the countryside.&#8221;</p>
<h3><strong>SCE and the PUC</strong></h3>
<p>The Tehachapi project is part of the Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative (<a href="http://www.energy.ca.gov/reti/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">RETI</a>) process, a statewide initiative created to &#8220;identify the transmission projects needed to accommodate the renewable energy goals and mandates, support future energy policy, and facilitate transmission corridor designation and transmission and generation siting and permitting.&#8221;</p>
<p>It appears to be a process to identify how to acquire federal money for renewable energy projects in the state.</p>
<p>According to one energy expert who asked to remain anonymous, some of the projects for consideration are necessary and some are not. There are many energy experts who agree that the Tehachepi project is important for wind development. However, experts question how the projects are doing financially because of financing issues and environmentalist challenges.</p>
<p>Wind projects always have a&#8221; raptor component&#8221;;  the turbines kill hundreds of golden eagles and other protected raptors every year, resulting in lawsuits and shutting down the wind farms.</p>
<p>On October 12, 2009, Federal Energy Secretary Ken Salazar and California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed what they called “a model of federal-state initiative and cooperation” which created &#8220;expedited review&#8221; and processing and Recovery Act funding to spur the development of &#8220;environmentally appropriate&#8221; renewable energy on U.S. lands in California.</p>
<p>Then through the <a href="http://www.recovery.gov/About/Pages/The_Act.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener">American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009</a>,  the federal stimulus program, President Obama and Congress made $41 million available &#8220;to facilitate a rapid and responsible move to large-scale production of renewables on public lands.&#8221; The Act directs economic stimulus funding to qualified renewable energy projects that begin construction by December 1, 2010<strong>.</strong></p>
<p>The Tehachapi project was started in October 2010.</p>
<p>With so much federal money in the mix, there is much more at stake than SCE or the CPUC appear to be admitting to. The outcome appears to have been decided at the outset of the project, as happens with so many large-scale projects.</p>
<p>But the residents of Chino Hills have valid concerns and appear to have been railroaded by another big <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Octopus:_A_Story_of_California" target="_blank" rel="noopener">octopus</a>. There is still time to halt the project and look at the viable alternatives proposed by the city, which it does not appear has been done with any sincerity by the CPUC.</p>
<p>In a thoughtful letter <a href="http://www.orangejuiceblog.com/2011/06/open-letter-to-cpuc-sce-and-gov-brown-re-tehachapi-renewable-transmission-project/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>published</strong></a> in the Orange County Register after the CPUC approved SCE&#8217;s Tehachapi project, Mayor Ed Graham spelled out what the citizens of Chino Hills have been going through: &#8220;Southern California Edison, hiding under the cloak of delivering politically correct ‘green energy,’ can get the CPUC’s approval to build anything on their existing rights-of-way with complete disregard for people impacted along the way and even disregard for their own standards. Our entire community is permanently disfigured by the CPUC’s decision.&#8221;</p>
<p>Graham warned that any California city or town could be next, and asks how the CPUC could possibly be fulfilling its mission of providing &#8220;reliable utility service and infrastructure at reasonable rates, with a commitment to environmental enhancement and a healthy California economy.”</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2011/07/20/green-power-project-jolts-citizens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">20185</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-19 18:24:43 by W3 Total Cache
-->