<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dan Harkey &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/dan-harkey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:02:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>Harkey files $10 Million lawsuit against fellow state lawmaker</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/09/16/harkey-files-5-million-lawsuit-against-fellow-state-lawmaker/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/09/16/harkey-files-5-million-lawsuit-against-fellow-state-lawmaker/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Hrabe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics and Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diane Harkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLAPP suit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dan Harkey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Wyland]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=49862</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A Republican state lawmaker who routinely decries “lawsuit abuse” and “feeding trial lawyers” has filed a $10 million civil lawsuit against a fellow state lawmaker for intentional infliction of emotional]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Republican state lawmaker who routinely decries “lawsuit abuse” and “feeding trial lawyers” has filed <a href="http://johnhrabe.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/HarkeyComplaint.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">a $10 million civil lawsuit</a> against a fellow state lawmaker for intentional infliction of emotional distress.</p>
<p><a href="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Diane-Harkey-wikimedia.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="alignright size-full wp-image-49864" alt="Diane Harkey wikimedia" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Diane-Harkey-wikimedia.jpg" width="220" height="219" srcset="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Diane-Harkey-wikimedia.jpg 220w, https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Diane-Harkey-wikimedia-150x150.jpg 150w" sizes="(max-width: 220px) 100vw, 220px" /></a>Assemblywoman Diane Harkey, R-Dana Point, is suing state Sen. Mark Wyland, R- San Diego, for defamation, presenting her in a false light and intentional infliction of emotional distress, according to court records first obtained by <a href="http://sdrostra.com/?p=35755" target="_blank" rel="noopener">SDRostra.com</a>. Harkey says that Wyland’s statements at a summer Tea Party event exposed her to “hatred, contempt, ridicule” and even caused her to seek “medical treatment on a number of occasions.”</p>
<p>Wyland allegedly alluded to Harkey’s ongoing financial and legal troubles surrounding the bankruptcy of Point Center Financial Inc., a company that is controlled by her husband, Dan. The Orange County assemblywoman has reported the company on her <a href="http://www.fppc.ca.gov/form700/2012/Legislature/Assembly/R_Harkey_Diane.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">financial disclosure forms</a> filed with the state’s Fair Political Practices Commission.</p>
<p>Disgruntled investors say that Dan Harkey made ill-advised loans and pocketed additional fees from the company. In July, a jury “found Dan Harkey and his company liable for $9 million to investors,” according to the <a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jul/15/business/la-fi-harkey-verdict-20130716" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Los Angeles Times</a>.</p>
<h3><b>Statements in question</b></h3>
<p>The week of the jury verdict, Wyland allegedly made the following statements that were apparently so hateful they forced Harkey to seek medical treatment:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><i>“Unfortunately, there has been a lawsuit brought by a lot of investors of modest means against her and her husband for defrauding them. &#8230; There was decision that those investors were defrauded and there is a judgment.”</i></p>
<p>While Harkey has filed a $10 million lawsuit against Wyland for allegedly misstating facts, her own complaint gets some simple facts wrong. Harkey’s complaint refers to “the public office for which she seeking as a Member of the Franchise Tax Board.” That’s factually incorrect. Not only is Harkey seeking a position on the state Board of Equalization, but members of the Franchise Tax Board are not elected at all.</p>
<h3><b>Harkey: Critic of “feeding trial lawyers”</b></h3>
<p>As a member of the Legislature, Harkey has repeatedly criticized lawsuit abuse. Earlier this month, Harkey opposed <a href="http://www.the-tidings.com/index.php/news/newslocal/3773-sb-131-ab-154-head-for-gov-browns-desk" target="_blank" rel="noopener">SB131</a>, a measure to allow victims of sexual abuse to bring civil lawsuits against private organizations that harbored abusers, which the Legislature just passed.</p>
<p>“It ought not to be just about reopening wounds and feeding trial attorneys,” Harkey said in a floor <a href="http://calchannel.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=7&amp;clip_id=1612" target="_blank" rel="noopener">speech against</a> the bill.</p>
<p>Harkey, according to <a href="http://arc.asm.ca.gov/member/73/newsletter/03_10_19.htm?keepThis=true&amp;TB_iframe=true&amp;height=600" target="_blank" rel="noopener">her legislative website</a>, has also introduced legislation that “prevents lawsuit abuse and protects our state and local municipalities.” She has also <a href="http://arc.asm.ca.gov/member/AD73/?p=article&amp;sid=217&amp;id=250760" target="_blank" rel="noopener">criticized the state’s payment</a> of interest on legal settlements because it “often times merely serves to fund the next lawsuit against small businesses and California employers.”</p>
<h3><b>Possible SLAPP lawsuit? </b></h3>
<p>Harkey’s defamation suit could be considered an example of a “Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation,” or SLAPP case. According to the California Anti-SLAPP Project, a public interest law firm and policy organization that fights such cases, a <a href="http://www.casp.net/sued-for-freedom-of-speech-california/what-is-a-first-amendment-slapp/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">SLAPP case</a> is “legally meritless, they can effectively achieve their principal purpose: to chill public debate on specific issues.”</p>
<p>Wyland’s reference to Harkey’s lawsuit could be considered to be a valid criticism that is relevant to her campaign for the state’s tax board. In the past, the business dealing of the Harkey family have been raised in her political campaigns.</p>
<p>In February 2013, the Orange County Register reported that a group of angry investors had demanded that <a href="http://www.ocregister.com/taxdollars/harkey-497771-investors-diane.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Harkey resign from office</a> and abandon her candidacy for the state Board of Equalization. “Investors have lost 96-cents on the dollar invested yet you and your husband continue to live in a guard gated, ocean front home, drive a Rolls Royce, own a stable of horses and otherwise live an affluent lifestyle paid for by investors,&#8221; a letter from the investors said.</p>
<p>In 2009, the Los Angeles Times reported, “<a href="http://articles.latimes.com/2009/mar/03/business/fi-harkey3" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Harkey accepted</a> $16,600 in political contributions from real estate developers who had received loans from her husband&#8217;s business, now under investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission.”</p>
<p><em><strong>(Correction: This article originally said the lawsuit was for $5 million. It really was for $10 million, as the text now shows.)</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/09/16/harkey-files-5-million-lawsuit-against-fellow-state-lawmaker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">49862</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-20 00:36:25 by W3 Total Cache
-->