<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DowntownArena.org &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/downtownarena-org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:56:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>Sacramento arena proponents make desperate weekend robo-calls</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/11/18/sacramento-arena-proponents-make-desperate-weekend-robo-calls/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/11/18/sacramento-arena-proponents-make-desperate-weekend-robo-calls/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katy Grimes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2013 17:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste, Fraud, and Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subsidies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax increases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxpayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DowntownArena.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[darrell Steinberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voters for a Fair Arena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katy Grimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacramento]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacramento Kings]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=53209</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My weekend was interrupted with yet another robo-call. But unlike other robo-callers, this outfit actually left a message&#8230; a jaw-dropping message. Never mind that I have an unlisted home phone]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My weekend was interrupted with yet another robo-call. But unlike other robo-callers, this outfit actually left a message&#8230; a jaw-dropping message.</p>
<p><a href="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/arena1.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-48492 alignright" alt="arena1" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/arena1-150x150.jpg" width="150" height="150" /></a></p>
<p>Never mind that I have an unlisted home phone number.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;This is an urgent call from  DowntownArena.org,&#8221; the message said. The caller claimed &#8220;Out-of-towners&#8221; are trying to stop the arena.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;The arena will provide $157 million annually, and create 4,000 jobs. This is an exciting time in Sacramento history,&#8221; the caller said. </em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>“This is Michael Ault, president and CEO of the Downtown Partnership. We need your help,” the caller said. &#8220;Stop the dishonest petition collectors.&#8221;</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;If you believe you&#8217;ve been deceived into signing one of these petitions, please call immediately.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Never mind that I have an unlisted home phone number.</p>
<p>The organizers behind <a href="http://downtownarena.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">downtownarena.org</a>, a group pressuring taxpayers for a multi-million dollar government subsidy to build the Kings a new stadium in downtown Sacramento, apparently illegally called more than 110,000 Sacramento households this weekend as part of a disinformation and intimidation campaign to dissuade residents from voting on the deal which will cost the people of Sacramento more than three-quarters of a billion dollars over the next four decades.</p>
<h3>Well, I never&#8230; $908 million by taxpayers for an arena?</h3>
<div title="Page 1">
<p>&#8220;Documents reveal that the City of Sacramento intends to borrow $304 million dollars &#8211; paying over $770,000,000 &#8211; to subsidize construction of a new downtown arena,&#8221; <a href="http://ourcityourvote.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Fair-Arena-Deal-Release-13-11-05.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Voters for a Fair Arena</a> recently reported. &#8220;The City must also build a multimillion-dollar reserve fund to supplement the general fund when arena revenues fail to meet projections.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://ourcityourvote.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Voters for a Fair Arena</a> is a group recently formed, not to stop the arena, but instead committed to allowing a public vote on the Sacramento Entertainment and Sports Complex project, and towards advocating for a deal which is equitable, fiscally responsible, and appropriately risk-managed.</p>
<p>According to the proposed terms of the 36-year bond,Voters for a Fair Arena reported the City will spend more than $770 million to repay the debt, with payments as high as $24.8 million per year.</p>
<p>The City of Sacramento will contribute over $908 million dollars of public resources to subsidize construction of a new arena, according to documents released by Goldman Sachs on April 8th, 2013, released to the public upon request by Sacramento City Treasurer, Russell Fehr.</p>
<div title="Page 1">
<p>Broken down by household, every single homeowner in Sacramento will be tagged with a cost of $5,200. I know I don&#8217;t have an extra $5,200 in my pocket &#8212; especially for a sports arena, which benefits few.</p>
<h3>What the &amp;%$@!</h3>
<p>“We wanted to make sure to get out the message to voters&#8230;, and we wanted to go directly to the voters in their houses,” Joshua Wood, Executive Director of DowntownArena.org, bragged to <a href="http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2013/11/16/sacramento-arena-supporter-robocall-notifies-of-option-to-remove-signatures-from-stop-petition/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">CBS 13 news</a>.</p>
<p>Voters For A Fair Arena Deal sent out an email providing information about the phone call code violation, after receiving many emails and phone call complaints about the DowntownArena.org robo-call.</p>
<p>Wood is apparently boasting his organization&#8217;s culpability in over 110,000 violations of <a href="http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=puc&amp;group=02001-03000&amp;file=2871-2876" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Public Utilities Code section 2874(a)</a>. <i><br />
</i></p>
<p>That code section says:</p>
<p>2874. (a) Whenever telephone calls are placed through the use of an automatic dialing-announcing device, the device may be operated only after an unrecorded, natural voice announcement has been made to the person called by the person calling. The announcement shall do all of the following:</p>
<p>(1) State the nature of the call and the name, address, and telephone number of the business or organization being represented, if any.</p>
<p>(2) Inquire as to whether the person called consents to hear the prerecorded message of the person calling. &#8221;</p>
<p>Voters for a Fair Arena are gathering signatures to petition the city to allow this to be on the ballot.</p>
<p>“Voters for a Fair Arena Deal,” was formed amidst unanswered concerns about the pubic cost of the current arena subsidy plan, which will require payments of $25 million per year for 27 years after the initial 8 years of “interest only” payments.  The state recently prohibited school districts from using similar long-term “capital appreciation” bonds.</p>
<p>The robocall by DowntownArena.org was not preceded by an unrecorded, natural voice announcement, nor was any inquiry attempted by DowntownArena.org to gain consent from the recipient, as required by the statute, according to Voters for a Fair Arena.</p>
<p>Each violation of PUC code 2874 is punishable by a fine of up to $500. &#8220;In just one day alone, DowntownArena.org willingly committed enough violations of the code to be subject to over $50,000,000 in fines,&#8221; Voters for a Fair Arena <a href="http://ourcityourvote.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/VFAD-Robocall-Press-Release.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reported</a>.</p>
<p>DowntownArena.org has ramped up their intimidation campaign over the past few weeks as the deadline to submit signatures for a ballot initiative to allow the residents of Sacramento to vote on the arena approaches closer. Besides making illegal and intrusive calls to half of Sacramento, DownArena.org agents have been following campaign volunteers who are trying to give residents the final say over an arena subsidy and badgering those who have already signed and simply want their day at the voting booth.</p>
<p>I was at a local grocery store last week, and saw people in front of the store, collecting signatures for a petition to build the arena.</p>
<p>There is no petition to build the arena. The City Council already voted to allow the arena to be built. This was merely an attempt to be misleading and confusing.</p>
<h3>Thug tactics</h3>
</div>
</div>
<p>I&#8217;ve never seen anything like the tactics used by DowntownArena.org. Their desperation proves there is a huge amount of money in this deal&#8230; taxpayer money.</p>
<p>The city&#8217;s gross spending is exactly why the arena deal needs a vote of the people. The arena deal, led by Mayor Kevin Johnson, has suffered from a lack of public debate, dubious financial numbers from the city, along with a growing public subsidy, and last-minute legislation by Sen. President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, to let the stadium avoid a real environmental impact review.</p>
<p>The publicly funded arena is being supported and pushed by labor unions and local government groups:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.ibewlocal340.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">IBEW Local 340</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.necasac.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">National Electrical Contractors Association (NECA) of Sacramento</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.sacregionbx.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Sacramento Regional Builders Exchange</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.agc-ca.org/districts.aspx?district=88" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Associated General Contractors</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.bomasacramento.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Building Owners &amp; Managers Association (BOMA) of Sacramento</a></li>
<li><a href="http://carmichaeldave.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Carmichael Dave</a> &amp; <a href="http://www.herewebuy.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">#HereWeBuy</a></li>
<li><a href="http://gsul.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Greater Sacramento Urban League</a></li>
<li><a href="http://downtownarena.org/about-us/www.abcnorcal.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Associated Builders &amp; Contractors (ABC) of Northern California</a></li>
<li><a href="http://metrochamber.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Sacramento Metro Chamber of Commerce</a></li>
<li><a href="http://downtownsac.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Sacramento Downtown Partnership</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.iw118.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Ironworkers Local 118</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.sacramentolabor.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Sacramento Central Labor Council</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.ncmca.org/teams/?u=NCMCA&amp;s=htosports&amp;t=c" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Northern California MCA</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.apmcsacramento.com/page/page/2594882.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Associated Plumbing &amp; Mechanical Contractors (APMC) of Sacramento<strong></strong></a></li>
<li><a href="http://rstreetpartnership.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">R Street Partnership</a></li>
<li>Midtown Business Association</li>
<li>Sacramento Hispanic Chamber of Commerce</li>
<li>Sacramento Asian Pacific Chamber of Commerce</li>
<li><a href="http://discovergold.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Sacramento Convention &amp; Visitors Bureau</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Anyone in Sacramento who received the robo-call and wants to file a complaint, can call the Public Utilities Commission at <a href="tel:1-800-649-7570" target="_blank">1-800-649-7570</a>, or online at <a href="https://appsssl.cpuc.ca.gov/cpucapplication/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">https://appsssl.cpuc.ca.gov/cpucapplication/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/11/18/sacramento-arena-proponents-make-desperate-weekend-robo-calls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">53209</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critics charge flap reveals Sac Bee&#8217;s pro-arena agenda</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/08/08/critics-charge-flap-reveals-sac-bees-pro-arena-agenda/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/08/08/critics-charge-flap-reveals-sac-bees-pro-arena-agenda/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Hrabe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 13:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FPPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Hrabe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacramento Bee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacramento Kings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James V. Lacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacramento arena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johsua Wood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DowntownArena.org]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=47676</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Critics have taken issue with the Sacramento Bee’s coverage of a Sacramento arena deal. Last Thursday, the Bee featured a story under the headline, &#8220;PAC pushes Sacramento arena vote but won&#8217;t]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Critics have taken issue with the Sacramento Bee’s coverage of a Sacramento arena deal.</p>
<p>Last Thursday, the Bee featured a story under the headline, &#8220;<a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2013/08/01/5614089/orange-county-pac-pushes-sacramento.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">PAC pushes Sacramento arena vote but won&#8217;t say where it is getting money.&#8221;</a> The story claimed that Taxpayers for Safer Neighborhoods, an Orange County-based political action committee, had been &#8220;working alongside a group of Sacramento activists gathering signatures for a ballot measure that would require voters to approve public subsidies for sports facilities.&#8221; According to the Bee&#8217;s version of events, the group wouldn&#8217;t disclose its funding.</p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignright size-full wp-image-47644" alt="Sacramento Bee Cutbacks" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/sac-bee.jpeg" width="369" height="224" align="right" hspace="20" srcset="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/sac-bee.jpeg 369w, https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/sac-bee-300x182.jpeg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 369px) 100vw, 369px" />The story of an <a href="http://johnhrabe.com/sacbee-misleads-oc-pac-hasnt-spent-a-dime-on-arena-campaign/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">out-of-town PAC secretly bankrolling the arena measure</a> stirred hundreds of comments on the <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2013/08/01/5614089/orange-county-pac-pushes-sacramento.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Bee&#8217;s website</a>. It also spawned a formal complaint with the state&#8217;s <a href="http://www.fppc.ca.gov/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Fair Political Practices Commission</a>. There&#8217;s just one problem: It&#8217;s completely false, according to people close to the story.</p>
<p>&#8220;The truth is the PAC has $144.50 in the bank and has done absolutely nothing more than lend its name to a press release in support of the Arena vote petition drive,&#8221; said James V. Lacy, the principal officer of Taxpayers for Safer Neighborhoods, who also serves as publisher of <a href="http://www.capoliticalreview.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">California Political Review</a>. &#8220;The Bee has manufactured this story in a deliberate effort to undermine the public&#8217;s right to vote on the arena deal.&#8221;</p>
<h3>Thundering about campaign donations</h3>
<p>The Bee<em></em> asked the political action committee to release its donors since July 1, a move that isn&#8217;t required by state or federal law. The group declined to share such financial information with a newspaper that, it believes, has used its news and editorial pages to back the arena deal. There&#8217;s also a reason why the group hasn&#8217;t released its list of July donations &#8212; none exist.</p>
<p>&#8220;The PAC can&#8217;t release a list of donors because we haven&#8217;t received any donations since July 1,&#8221; Lacy said.</p>
<p>The organization&#8217;s claims are independently confirmed by the <a href="http://cal-access.ss.ca.gov/PDFGen/pdfgen.prg?filingid=1776296&amp;amendid=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener">group&#8217;s latest campaign finance statement</a>, which showed less than $150 in cash on hand. During the past six months, the political action committee has spent just $426 in bank fees and a nominal consulting fee.</p>
<p>&#8220;Taxpayers for Safer Neighborhoods hasn&#8217;t spent a dime on the Sacramento arena campaign,&#8221; Lacy said. &#8220;The PAC has not signed contracts for any petition circulation, has not circulated any petitions or raised any funds for that purpose.&#8221;</p>
<p>Lacy said that the group&#8217;s involvement in the arena campaign has been limited to one press release. When asked why the group issued the release, Lacy said, &#8220;Anytime taxpayers are the victims of an insider deal, we feel compelled to speak out.&#8221;</p>
<p>That hasn&#8217;t stopped arena supporters from using the Bee&#8217;s misleading story for its political advantage. On Tuesday, Joshua Wood, the principal officer of the <a href="http://downtownarena.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">DowntownArena.org</a>, filed a formal complaint with the FPPC. The complaint is primarily based on the Bee&#8217;s<em></em><i> </i>articles.</p>
<p><em>Editors Note: Hrabe is research assistant for Jim Lacy&#8217;s upcoming book, &#8220;Taxifornia, How Liberals are Bankrupting California.&#8221;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/08/08/critics-charge-flap-reveals-sac-bees-pro-arena-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">47676</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-19 16:12:37 by W3 Total Cache
-->