<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>federal employees &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/federal-employees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:27:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>$70K pay for janitors + rate hike should = revolt</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/06/06/70k-for-janitors-rate-hike-should-revolt/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/06/06/70k-for-janitors-rate-hike-should-revolt/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CalWatchdog Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 13:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste, Fraud, and Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protected class]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Reed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Chalfant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[L.A. DWP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Department of Water and Power]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=43761</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[June 6, 2013 By Chris Reed Last year, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power imposed an 11 percent rate hike &#8212; which it called a &#8220;rate change&#8221; &#8212;]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>June 6, 2013</p>
<p>By Chris Reed</p>
<p><a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2013/06/06/70k-for-janitors-rate-hike-should-revolt/ladwp/" rel="attachment wp-att-43764"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-43764" alt="LADWP" src="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/LADWP-258x300.jpg" width="258" height="300" align="right" hspace="20" /></a>Last year, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power imposed an 11 percent rate hike &#8212; which it called a <a href="https://www.ladwp.com/ladwp/faces/ladwp/aboutus/a-financesandreports/a-fr-proposed-rates;jsessionid=r1ppRv0M5tD4tTy42F8lmKQXBkKjKK2hh2pNC7gL9kQy4gngz1cl!-1442471082?_afrLoop=1084246334786000&amp;_afrWindowMode=0&amp;_afrWindowId=null#%40%3F_afrWindowId%3Dnull%26_afrLoop%3D1084246334786000%26_afrWindowMode%3D0%26_adf.ctrl-state%3D4o4rmyc6i_4" target="_blank" rel="noopener">&#8220;rate change&#8221;</a> &#8212; on its power customers, while water customers saw rates go up 5 percent.</p>
<p>Millions of Angelenos will no doubt be thrilled to know what this is paying for: $70,000 a year janitors. No wonder DWP unions want to keep pay data secret.</p>
<p>This is from the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-dwp-salary-fight-20130605,0,5771814.story?track=rss" target="_blank" rel="noopener">L.A. Times</a>:</p>
<h3>Average DWP pay: $101,237. It&#8217;s good to be DWPer</h3>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge James Chalfant stared in disbelief Tuesday at a list of hundreds of Department of Water and Power employees who have asked that their names and salaries be withheld from the public, citing safety concerns.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;On the list were mechanics, typists and meter readers.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;&#8216;This is frivolous on its face; I mean, these are DWP employees,&#8217; Chalfant said, noting that the names of government employees are public and even undercover police officers have a hard time demonstrating they would be in danger if their names appeared on a list of department employees. &#8230;</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;The average DWP employee, including everyone from the highest-paid engineers to the lowest-paid temps, made $101,237 in 2012, the data show.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;Among the job titles that saw the biggest average pay increases over the last five years were custodians, up 25%, from $56,060 to $69,995.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;Welders&#8217; and machinists&#8217; pay grew 18% on average to $132,548 and $142,562, respectively. Those figures represent full-time employees who worked entire years in 2008 and 2012.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;Employees seeking anonymity made $110,730 on average in 2012, 12.4% more than workers whose names were released.&#8221;</em></p>
<h3>White House hearts federal employees</h3>
<p>Meanwhile, elsewhere on the public employee gratification front, The Washington Post reports the Obama administration is seeking a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/federal-eye/wp/2013/06/04/white-house-again-calls-for-federal-employee-raise/?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter" target="_blank" rel="noopener">raise in pay</a> for all federal employees.</p>
<p>The raise may be small (1 percent), but the same &#8220;step&#8221; pay raise policies seen in California government are used in the federal government, so the claim that federal employees have gone years without pay hikes is simply wrong. And aren&#8217;t we supposed to see belt-tightening and shared sacrifice in this post-sequester era?</p>
<p>Instead of pragmatism, we get disinformation. &#8220;As the President stated in his [fiscal year] 2014 Budget, a permanent pay freeze is neither sustainable nor desirable,” a White House statement noted.</p>
<h3>The myth of a &#8216;permanent pay freeze&#8217;</h3>
<p>What &#8220;permanent pay freeze&#8221;? Hundreds of thousands of federal workers have gotten step raises in recent years.</p>
<p>And who says a pay freeze for government employees &#8212; with raises earned for performance, not for staying alive &#8212; &#8220;is neither sustainable nor desirable&#8221;? Turnover among federal employees is minuscule. That indicates compensation is far more than adequate.</p>
<p>Government employees aren&#8217;t just a <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-02/stockton-ruling-makes-public-employees-a-protected-class.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">protected class in California</a>. It&#8217;s a federal phenomenon as well &#8212; a depressing one.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/06/06/70k-for-janitors-rate-hike-should-revolt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43761</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-14 20:37:39 by W3 Total Cache
-->