More specifically, credit — $100 million worth — goes to China Railway International USA, a venture spearheaded by Beijing’s national railroad, China Railway. The consortium has ponied up funds for XpressWest, “the transportation arm of Marnell Companies, a gaming resort development firm,” as the Sacramento Business Journal noted.

Formerly known as DesertXpress, the company has labored to send a high-speed track toward Las Vegas since “at least 2007,” reported the Los Angeles Times.

According to Chinese officials cited by the Times, passengers would travel “a 230-mile route with an additional stop in Palmdale and eventual service throughout the Los Angeles area using some of the same track that would be used by the publicly backed California high-speed rail project.” Past plans envisioned a run of 185 miles alongside I-15.

The logic behind the idea drew from some straightforward numbers. “About one-quarter of Las Vegas’s 41 million visitors in 2014 came from Southern California, according to the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority, many via a several hour highway drive,” Quartz noted. Vegas has been without a passenger train since Amtrak shut down its Desert Wind line in 1997.

Logistical doubts

This  train, which would share track with California’s state-funded high-speed rail, has run into its own version of a problem plaguing that track: reaching Los Angeles proper. “The project has the approval to cover about 190 miles from Las Vegas to the California desert city of Victorville, about 100-mile drive northeast of Los Angeles. It hasn’t broken ground. The project still needs government permission to connect with Southern California’s population centers,” Fox News reported.

“The project currently lacks permission to connect with the state of California’s planned high-speed rail project at a station to be built in Palmdale, 50 miles west of Victorville. A mountain range and about 50 more miles separate Palmdale from downtown Los Angeles.”

Skeptics quickly emerged with unflattering questions about the logistical constraints that could be imposed by the train’s pathway and travel times. “Anybody in L.A. keen to drive to Victorville to pay $89 to take an 80 minute ride to Vegas on a high-speed train?” tweeted Bloomberg View’s Adam Minter.

Adding to the speculation, estimates emerged that the train would require far in excess of the $100 million the Chinese have so far made available. “China’s CRRC Corp’s unit along with its peers from China will implement the rail corridor project at an estimated cost of $5 billion,” the Venture Capital Post noted.

Marshaling support

As yet, American officeholders have remained cagey. Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval said he hadn’t learned any details about the plans. “But in 2009,” according to the Las Vegas Review Journal, “the XpressWest project drew a key supporter: U.S. Sen Harry Reid, D-Nevada. ‘Senator Reid has been a cheerleader on this project for many years,’ Reid spokeswoman Kristen Orthman said Thursday. ‘He’s glad to see this progress and remains committed to assisting as needed.'”

And the Chinese government appears to have a firm interest in seeing the project to completion. Beijing created CRRC with the specific purpose of throwing the country’s considerable industrial weight around in foreign territories. “The merger of China’s two largest state-owned rail equipment makers has created an industry behemoth, second only to General Electric in size, that will be competing aggressively for projects across Africa, Southeast Asia, and Latin America,” Quartz observed. “China, once a major importer of rail technology, wants to be a world leader in high-speed rail, with projects that span the globe, focusing especially on emerging markets.”

But growth in the U.S. has also been marked as a priority. An employee of the conglomerate told Caixin online that the company “views China Railway International USA an important part of its plan to expand abroad.”

But Sandoval sought to temper worries with his announcement, according to the Las Vegas Review-Journal:

“This is not California,” Sandoval said, adding that as the driest state in the nation, Nevada is familiar with drought and has taken steps to curb water use and encourage conservation.

He said he feels “really good about what we’re doing” but added the state needs to plan for the future because no one can predict how long the drought will continue.

Through an executive order, the San Francisco Chronicle reported, Sandoval created “a seven-member panel of administrators, scientists and water officials to study the state’s long-term water plan.” Drawing from information provided by state and water agencies, the panel will set up a special Drought Summit scheduled for September of this year, filing biweekly summaries and a master report, according to the Chronicle. “The forum will rely on a soon-to-be-released report on states’ drought policies commissioned by the Western Governors Association, which Sandoval chairs.”

Cross-border relations

Sandoval’s moves build on an awareness of California’s challenges that reaches back to a collaborative initiative launched with Gov. Jerry Brown late last year. As chairman of the Western Governors’ Association, Sandoval organized a yearlong summit series with Brown that included “senior water, energy and agriculture policy leaders from government and the private sector,” the Associated Press reported.

“I think the drought will test our imagination and our science, our technology and our political capacity to collaborate,” Brown said at the time.

This year, both California and Nevada residents found their states plunged into nearly 100 percent drought conditions. Large stretches of both states suffered from “extreme” and “exceptional” drought, the most severe categories of water scarcity, Capital Public Radio observed.

Shared sources

The Golden State and the Silver State have long shared major sources of drinking water, including Lake Mead. While Gov. Sandoval indicated that the Nevada Drought Forum would be restricted to studying and recommending policy options, the proposal had no immediate effect on water rationing. At the start of this month, Southern Nevada Water Authority Bronson Mack had waved off concerns over additional water restrictions.

Lake Mead

“We believe the programs that we have and the tools that are available to our customers throughout the valley are sufficient,” he said, although he admitted that Nevada’s supply of water from Lake Mead ranked below the other five states relying on that source, according to Reuters.

“Lake Mead is one of at least four major sources for California’s water supply. The state draws 1.4 trillion gallons from the reservoir. By comparison, Clark County gets 90 percent of its water — or 97.8 billion gallons — from Lake Mead.”

John Entsminger, general manager of the Southern Nevada Water Authority, told the Review-Journal that Nevada’s current levels of water use reflected a sustainable conservation trajectory. Clark County, for instance, “which receives most of its water from the Colorado River feeding into Lake Mead, has been under drought conditions for 15 years.”

“Still, he said, the region, home to about 2 million residents and 40 million visitors annually, has managed to cut water usage through efficient landscaping, low-flow appliances and recycling gray water. Entsminger said Southern Nevada uses 40 percent less water than it did 15 years ago despite a growing population.”

New proposals

The Nevada Legislature, for its part, has several new water-related bills to consider this year. According to the Associated Press, one piece of legislation would tap half a million dollars for so-called “cloud seeding,” a process whereby precipitation-inducing chemicals are dispersed into cloud cover; others would increase groundwater regulation during periods of drought and battle water loss caused by flooding.