<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>hold politicians accountable &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/hold-politicians-accountable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 19:50:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>Lawmakers counter ballot proposal with watered down transparency measures</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2016/06/14/lawmakers-consider-wat/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2016/06/14/lawmakers-consider-wat/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Fleming]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 19:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics and Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles T. Munger Jr.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hold politicians accountable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California legislative transparency act]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=89347</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Lawmakers will consider two transparency bills on Wednesday in an effort to head off a ballot measure that would go to greater lengths. The Constitutional Legislative Transparency Act, backed by]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-84276" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/transparency-300x116.jpg" alt="transparency" width="300" height="116" srcset="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/transparency-300x116.jpg 300w, https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/transparency.jpg 640w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />Lawmakers will consider two transparency bills on Wednesday in an effort to head off a ballot measure that would go to greater lengths.</p>
<p>The Constitutional Legislative Transparency Act, backed by Republican donor Charles T. Munger, Jr., <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2016/05/05/transparency-measure-appears-headed-ballot/">is a constitutional amendment requiring the Legislature</a> make available online the final version of a bill at least 72 hours prior to a vote on either the Assembly or Senate floor. The Legislature-introduced versions, however, would make this apply to only votes in the second house.</p>
<p>The CLTA would also require all open legislative meetings be recorded with the videos posted online within 24 hours, while the Legislature-introduced versions only require it be done &#8220;promptly.&#8221;</p>
<p>Another provision of the Munger-backed measure gives permission to individuals to record and share their own videos of open meetings, while the Legislature-introduced versions do not.</p>
<p>&#8220;Unfortunately the current legislative proposal is not palatable, though we continue to work with the Legislature in hopes we can agree on a reform that takes transparency forward, not backward, from what’s already headed for the November ballot,&#8221; said Josh Rosa, a spokesman for the measure&#8217;s committee, Hold Politicians Accountable. </p>
<p>State law requires lawmakers to hold informational hearings on voter-supported initiatives.</p>
<p><iframe class="scribd_iframe_embed" src="https://www.scribd.com/embeds/315713828/content?start_page=1&view_mode&access_key=key-rk39TeqDl1TEsVW4dW0F"  data-auto-height="true" scrolling="no" id="scribd_315713828" width="100%" height="500" frameborder="0"></iframe>
		<div style="font-size:10px;text-align:center;width:100%"><a href="https://www.scribd.com/doc/315713828" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">View this document on Scribd</a></div></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2016/06/14/lawmakers-consider-wat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">89347</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-18 06:56:39 by W3 Total Cache
-->