<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Poll on City of Davis Takeover of PG&amp;E &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/international-brotherhood-of-electrical-workers-poll-on-city-of-davis-takeover-of-pge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 23:26:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>Poll: Davis voters oppose socializing electricity</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/20/poll-davis-voters-oppose-socializing-electricity/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/20/poll-davis-voters-oppose-socializing-electricity/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wayne Lusvardi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 23:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life in California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City of Davis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CA Proposed Takeover of PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Poll on City of Davis Takeover of PG&E]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Austin Texas Purchase of 5 Cent Solar Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne Lusvardi]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=60905</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[  The city of Davis is renowned for its liberal local politics, green bicycle paths, local farmer’s market, Whole Earth Festival, percentage of those with graduate degrees, and the campus]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong> </strong></em></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><a href="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Partners-for-a-Greener-Davis.png"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-60928" alt="Partners-for-a-Greener-Davis" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Partners-for-a-Greener-Davis-300x269.png" width="300" height="269" /></a></span><span>The city of Davis is renowned for its liberal local politics, green bicycle paths, local farmer’s market, Whole Earth Festival, percentage of those with graduate degrees, and the campus of the University of California, Davis. The city is about the last place in California one would expect opposition to the city creating its own, green-oriented municipal electric utility to replace ownership by the private Pacific Gas &amp; Electric.</span></p>
<p>However, a new poll sponsored by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers found a plurality of Davis voters, 47 percent, <a href="http://www.ibew1245.com/news-Local1245/Davis_Survey_3-6-14.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">opposed</a> creating a municipal electric utility. The poll was conducted by the independent Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin &amp; Associates.</p>
<p>IBEW spokesperson Hunter Stern said:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>“Davis voters see through the false promises. Politicians promise green power at not greater cost.  But voters understand that’s just empty rhetoric. Davis deserves safe, reliable power that is truly green.  This plan is not it, and voters know it.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>FMM&amp;A, as the polling firm calls itself, sent the union a memo concluding (boldface and underline in original):</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;Overall, the survey found that <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>voters are satisfied with the services provided by PG&amp;E, and are strongly inclined to oppose a proposal for the City of Davis to take over the electric utility.</strong> </span>An overwhelming majority of voters are satisfied with PG&amp;E – particularly with the utility’s reliability. Voters are not confident that the City of Davis could do a better job, and perceive PG&amp;E as both the better service and also more likely to achieve clean energy goals. When asked directly, a plurality of voters would oppose a City of Davis takeover of the electric utility, and anticipate that such a takeover would have a negative impact on the City budget, electricity rates, and service reliability.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><strong>      Union Poll on City of Davis Takeover of PG&amp;E by City</strong></p>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="148">Definitely Yes</td>
<td valign="top" width="148">8%</td>
<td rowspan="3" valign="top" width="148"><strong>TOTAL YES 34%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="148">Probably Yes</td>
<td valign="top" width="148">16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="148">Undecided, lean  Yes</td>
<td valign="top" width="148">10%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" valign="top" width="443"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="148">Undecided, lean No</td>
<td valign="top" width="148">8%</td>
<td rowspan="3" valign="top" width="148"><strong>TOTAL NO 47%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="148">Probably No</td>
<td valign="top" width="148">17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="148">Definitely No</td>
<td valign="top" width="148">22%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" valign="top" width="443"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="148">Don’t Know, Not Available</td>
<td valign="top" width="148">19%</td>
<td valign="top" width="148"><strong>TOTAL DON’T KNOW 19%</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" valign="top" width="443">Source: <a href="http://www.ibew1245.com/news-Local1245/Polling_Memo_3-6-14.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers sponsored opinion poll</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Obama supporters</h3>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Of course, an opinion poll funded by an electrical workers&#8217; union whose members work for PG&amp;E must be scrutinized more deeply.  The poll was conducted of </span><a style="font-size: 13px;" href="http://www.ibew1245.com/news-Local1245/Polling_Memo_3-6-14.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">400</a><span style="font-size: 13px;"> telephone interviews with voters in Davis, with a sampling error of 4.9 percent at a 95 percent confidence interval.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">According to </span><a style="font-size: 13px;" href="http://www.city-data.com/city/Davis-California.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">City-Data.com</a><span style="font-size: 13px;">, 65 percent of voters in Davis in 2012 voted for Barack Obama for president. So like most university towns, this is a heavily liberal, Democratic city. Here&#8217;s the breakdown of opposition to the city electricity takeover:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size: 13px;">85 percent of Republicans</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 13px;">46 percent of independents</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size: 13px;">42 percent of Democrats</span></li>
</ul>
<h3><span style="font-size: 1.17em;">Rates trump environment</span></h3>
<p>An interesting aspect was that the survey found that, while Davis residents were concerned about the environment, they were more concerned about their own electricity rates:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;As shown in Figure 7 below, pluralities of voters feel that such a change would have a negative impact on the City’s budget, what they pay for electricity, and the reliability of electricity service. At the same time, most voters feel that the change would have a positive impact on job opportunities and clean energy consumption in Davis.&#8221;</em></p>
<p><a href="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Davis-electricity-Figure-7.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-60925" alt="Davis electricity, Figure 7" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Davis-electricity-Figure-7.jpg" width="604" height="326" srcset="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Davis-electricity-Figure-7.jpg 604w, https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Davis-electricity-Figure-7-300x161.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 604px) 100vw, 604px" /></a></p>
<p>In short, even liberal voters who strongly backed President Obama and seek a cleaner environment also vote their pocketbooks. It&#8217;s something the politicians should take into account.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/20/poll-davis-voters-oppose-socializing-electricity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">60905</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-20 02:37:09 by W3 Total Cache
-->