<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Kent Salazar &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/kent-salazar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2013 13:00:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>Miracle: L.A. Times finally admits Obama sees fracking as safe</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/06/23/miracle-l-a-times-finally-acknowledges-obama-says-fracking-is-safe/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CalWatchdog Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2013 13:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydraulic fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kent Salazar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kern County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neela Banerjee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occidental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sally Jewell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wes Venteicher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Reed]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=44663</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[June 23, 2013 By Chris Reed President Obama&#8217;s first energy secretary, interior secretary and EPA chief all at various times in his first term depicted hydraulic fracking &#8212; aka fracking]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>June 23, 2013</p>
<p>By Chris Reed</p>
<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-35885" alt="fracking.equip" src="http://www.calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/fracking.equip_.jpg" width="250" height="333" align="right" hspace="20" />President Obama&#8217;s first energy secretary, interior secretary and EPA chief all at various times in his first term depicted hydraulic fracking &#8212; aka fracking &#8212; as safe. His Energy Department put out a report in 2011 describing the newly improved energy exploration process as just another dirty heavy industry that isn&#8217;t much of an environmental concern if it is well-regulated. The president himself even campaigned on the boom in U.S. natural gas production created by tracking.</p>
<p>But repeated Nexis hunts have shown that this fact inexplicably has never been reported in The Los Angeles Times. Last month, the paper&#8217;s <a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2013/05/18/obama-interior-secretary-shreds-fracking-foes-lat-omits/" target="_blank">intent to deceive Californians</a> on this topic was made crystal-clear when it covered a speech by new Interior Secretary Sally Jewell on fracking rules for public and Indian lands. In the speech, as The New York Times reported, Jewell offered a ringing endorsement of fracking&#8217;s long and safe history. But the L.A. Times left this out, instead citing a petroleum industry spokesman as making the case for fracking&#8217;s long and safe history. I wonder how LAT reporters Neela Banerjee and Wes Venteicher sleep at night.</p>
<h3>It was on the op-ed page &#8212; but at least it was finally in the LAT</h3>
<p>On Friday, however, Jewell was finally quoted and the Obama administration&#8217;s position was finally acknowledged by the Times. It may have been in an <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-zierman-california-fracking-moratorium-20130621,0,1007838.story" target="_blank" rel="noopener">op-ed by Rock Zierman of the California Independent Petroleum Association</a>, not in an editorial or a front-page analysis, but it was there in black and white and can no longer be denied.<em><br />
</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;The &#8216;safe fracking&#8217; question has been asked and answered many times over by government regulators, scientists and other technical experts, and they have concluded that hydraulic fracturing is a fundamentally safe technology. Interior secretaries and EPA heads have repeatedly said that fracking can be done, and is being done, so that it doesn&#8217;t present environmental or public health problems.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;That&#8217;s been the case for decades, Interior Secretary Sally Jewell, a former petroleum engineer and a former president of REI, the outdoor equipment retailer, said in May. Jewell&#8217;s predecessor, Ken Salazar, testified to Congress that hydraulic fracturing &#8216;has been done safely hundreds of thousands of times&#8217; and warned lawmakers against anti-fracking &#8216;hysteria.'&#8221;</em></p>
<h3>If Obama views were known, polls would change</h3>
<p>The LAT web page with the op-ed, alas, has a link to a poll showing Californians are deeply worried about fracking &#8212; thanks to the deceit of enviro reporters like Banerjee and Venteicher.</p>
<p>But if the views of the Obama administration were actually regularly acknowledged, we wouldn&#8217;t just have polls that are much more favorable to fracking. We&#8217;d have a completely different public debate, one in which the default view is that fracking&#8217;s critics are, as former Interior Secretary Ken Salazar suggests, &#8220;hysterics.&#8221;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">44663</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-14 14:40:34 by W3 Total Cache
-->