<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>media groupthink &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/media-groupthink/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:49:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>6 stories out of 317: LAT, Bee, Chronicle hide Obama fracking views</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/06/15/6-stories-out-of-317-lat-bee-chronicle-hide-obama-fracking-views/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/06/15/6-stories-out-of-317-lat-bee-chronicle-hide-obama-fracking-views/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Reed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2014 13:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thought Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacramento Bee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sally Jewell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco Chronicle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sierra Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Reed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydraulic fracturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media groupthink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Salazar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green groupthink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Los Angeles Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media blackout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Administration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=64803</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have been whining about how the media cover big issues for decades, but there is something uniquely strange about the decision of the California media &#8212; in the midst]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-54082" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/media-blackout-efx.jpg" alt="media-blackout-efx" width="268" height="320" align="right" hspace="20" srcset="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/media-blackout-efx.jpg 268w, https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/media-blackout-efx-251x300.jpg 251w" sizes="(max-width: 268px) 100vw, 268px" />I have been whining about how the media cover big issues for decades, but there is something uniquely strange about the decision of the California media &#8212; in the midst of a sharp state debate over fracking &#8212; to not mention that the Obama administration <a href="http://fuelfix.com/blog/2014/02/05/former-obama-official-fracking-has-never-been-an-environmental-problem/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">considers</a> <a href="http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2013/Aug/05/obama-administration-defends-fracking-safety-again/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">it</a> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/17/us/interior-proposes-new-rules-for-fracking-on-us-land.html?_r=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener">safe</a>.</p>
<p>I have heard that some journos think my criticism is unfair and/or that I am a loopy ideologue. My response: However I feel (or however you feel) about fracking, isn&#8217;t it an obligation for California newspapers to relate how the, yunno, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT feels about its safety?</p>
<p>Of course it is.</p>
<p>This weekend, I revved up Nexis to see it the media blackout continues. I searched for stories that mentioned &#8220;California&#8221; and &#8220;fracking&#8221; from June 14, 2013, to June 14, 2014:</p>
<h3>Times, Bee and Chronicle fracking coverage</h3>
<p>I found 132 stories in the Los Angeles Times.</p>
<p>How many mentioned the Obama administration considered fracking safe?</p>
<p>One &#8212; a June 21, 2013 op-ed by Rock Zierman, CEO of the California Independent Petroleum Assn.</p>
<p>I found 124 stories in the Sacramento Bee.</p>
<p>How many mentioned the Obama administration considered fracking safe?</p>
<p>One &#8212; a March 30, 2014, op-ed by <span class="SS_L3">Catherine Reheis-Boyd, president of the Western States Petroleum Association.</span></p>
<p>The Bee ran a <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/11/28/209028/fracking-led-energy-boom-is-turning.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">piece</a> from McClatchy&#8217;s D.C. bureau in late November 2013 that didn&#8217;t even raise the question of fracking&#8217;s safety; it just pointed out how widely used it was and how it was transforming the economy of several states.</p>
<p>So I guess that one counts, giving the Bee two stories that give the Obama perspective on fracking safety.</p>
<p>I found 61 stories in the San Francisco Chronicle.</p>
<p>How many mentioned the Obama administration considered fracking safe?</p>
<p>Two, by staff reporter David R. Baker. Another Baker piece describes Obama as a fracking supporter.</p>
<p>So that gives the Chronicle three.</p>
<p>So there were 317 stories mentioning &#8220;California&#8221; and &#8220;fracking&#8221; for the past year, and only six mentioned that the Obama administration considers if safe &#8212; and two of those were op-eds from oil trade association executives and one was a wire story.</p>
<p>So only Baker&#8217;s three stories amount to staff-produced journalism on California and fracking from the state&#8217;s three most influential newspapers that noted the profoundly important fact that the greenest administration in U.S. history sides with those who say fracking is safe.</p>
<p>Draw your own conclusions. Sure looks like groupthink to me.</p>
<p>Green, please-the-Sierra-Club groupthink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/06/15/6-stories-out-of-317-lat-bee-chronicle-hide-obama-fracking-views/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">64803</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-14 14:38:18 by W3 Total Cache
-->