<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>methane &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/methane/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 17:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>Environmentalists use Porter Ranch disaster to target CA fracking</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2016/02/01/environmentalists-use-porter-ranch-disaster-target-ca-fracking/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2016/02/01/environmentalists-use-porter-ranch-disaster-target-ca-fracking/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Reed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 17:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porter Ranch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeSmogBlog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EDF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SS-25 well]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Reed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shale gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-fracking]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=86034</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The California Public Utilities Commission is considering closing the massive 3,600-acre natural gas storage location in the Porter Ranch area of Los Angeles County, anxious that the Southern California Gas Co. has]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-48856" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/o-CALIFORNIA-FRACKING.jpg" alt="o-CALIFORNIA-FRACKING" width="309" height="277" align="right" hspace="20" srcset="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/o-CALIFORNIA-FRACKING.jpg 309w, https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/o-CALIFORNIA-FRACKING-300x268.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 309px) 100vw, 309px" />The California Public Utilities Commission is considering<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a id="yiv6844099717yui_3_16_0_1_1454031794427_2592" class="yiv6844099717" href="http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-puc-probing-permanent-closure-of-aliso-canyon-gas-field-amid-massive-leak-20160127-story.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">closing<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></a>the massive 3,600-acre natural gas storage location in the Porter Ranch area of Los Angeles County, anxious that the Southern California Gas Co. has been unable to stop massive leaks of methane from the SS-25 well that began on Oct. 23. The fear is that many other aging wells &#8212; which are used to store natural gas and extract it &#8212; could spring similar difficult-to-stop leaks. Natural gas is more than 99 percent methane.</p>
<p>Given that 11 million residents rely on these power supplies, that shows the gravity of the problem.</p>
<p>Now the Environmental Defense Funds and other green groups are using the disaster to make the case against fracking in California, arguing that the inability to stem the Porter Ranch leak shows that energy exploration companies and regulators alike are overconfident in their ability to keep energy production safe.</p>
<p>The DeSmogBlog, which is heavily visited by greens around the world and has been quoted and generated stories in many leading world publications, made the case in a<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a id="yiv6844099717yui_3_16_0_1_1454031794427_2603" class="yiv6844099717" href="http://www.desmogblog.com/2016/01/20/aging-infrastructure-fracking-eyed-massive-porter-ranch-california-gas-leak" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">recent post</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><span id="yiv6844099717yui_3_16_0_1_1454031794427_2609" class="yiv6844099717">SS</span>-25 well itself was not fracked, state records show, but it is not uncommon for companies to frack gas storage sites to help compensate for damage to underground caverns from injecting gas underground. Another well near<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><span id="yiv6844099717yui_3_16_0_1_1454031794427_2611" class="yiv6844099717">SS</span>-25,<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><span id="yiv6844099717yui_3_16_0_1_1454031794427_2613" class="yiv6844099717">SS</span>-40, was in fact fracked, but that fracking took place at depths of over 9,000 feet, while the<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><span id="yiv6844099717yui_3_16_0_1_1454031794427_2615" class="yiv6844099717">SS</span>-25 leak is believed to be far closer to the surface.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>“About two times a year on average, operators of gas storage facilities use hydraulic fracturing to enhance storage, mostly in one facility serving southern California (Aliso Canyon),” The California Council on Science and Technology noted in a January 2015<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a id="yiv6844099717yui_3_16_0_1_1454031794427_2621" class="yiv6844099717" href="https://ccst.us/publications/2015/2015SB4-v1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">report</a>.</p></blockquote>
<h3>Methane leaks depicted as natural result of fracking</h3>
<p>Contrary to the many claims that natural gas is the<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a id="yiv6844099717yui_3_16_0_1_1454031794427_2629" class="yiv6844099717" href="http://www.nationalfuelgas.com/natural_gas_environment.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">clean form</a><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>of fossil fuel, environmentalists cited by DeSmogBlog say the picture is much more complex:</p>
<blockquote><p>The development roughly 15 years ago of high-volume hydraulic fracturing, combined with horizontal drilling, also spurred a shale gas rush nationwide — and researchers say that overall, the shale gas rush has leaked methane at unusually high rates.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Prof. Robert Howarth has been researching methane leaks from the shale gas rush for years, after co-authoring a landmark paper in 2011 that showed that natural gas production could be even worse for the climate than burning coal if enough methane leaked out.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Howarth now estimates that the shale gas rush has been remarkably leaky.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p></blockquote>
<div id="yiv6844099717yui_3_16_0_1_1454031794427_2643" class="yiv6844099717">
<blockquote><p>“The conclusion is that shale gas development during the 2009–2011 period, on a full life cycle basis including storage and delivery to consumers, may have on average emitted 12 percent of the methane produced,” Prof. Howarth concluded in a peer-reviewed<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a id="yiv6844099717yui_3_16_0_1_1454031794427_2647" class="yiv6844099717" href="http://www.eeb.cornell.edu/howarth/publications/f_EECT-61539-perspectives-on-air-emissions-of-methane-and-climatic-warmin_100815_27470.pdf" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">paper</a><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>published in the journal Energy and Emission Control Technologies.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>By contrast, the Environmental Protection Agency&#8217;s official estimates indicate that less than 2 percent of gas leaks nationwide. But the<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><span id="yiv6844099717yui_3_16_0_1_1454031794427_2653" class="yiv6844099717">EPA</span>&#8216;s estimates have come under fire for a too-heavy reliance on industry-supplied estimates and because their numbers seem inconsistent with field measurements.</p></blockquote>
<h3>CA environmentalists: Don&#8217;t trust state regulators to do good job</h3>
<p>This theme &#8212; that regulators can&#8217;t be trusted &#8212; is already an established stance of anti-fracking forces in California. In July 2015, state rules governing fracking took effect that a<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><a id="yiv6844099717yui_3_16_0_1_1454031794427_2659" class="yiv6844099717" href="http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-state-issues-fracking-rules-20150701-story.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Los Angeles Times headline</a><span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span>declared were the &#8220;toughest in the nation.&#8221;</p>
<p>But environmental groups were skeptical nonetheless:</p>
<blockquote><p>Critics, including lawmakers in Sacramento, question whether the state&#8217;s scandal-plagued oil regulator is up to the task of implementing the wide-ranging new rules. The agency has admittedly fallen behind in monitoring oil field wastewater injections into federally protected aquifers. It has failed to obtain required data from oil operators and has missed deadlines imposed by legislators.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p></blockquote>
</div>
<div id="yiv6844099717yui_3_16_0_1_1454031794427_2669" class="yiv6844099717" dir="ltr">
<blockquote><p>“Regulations are only as good as their enforcement,” said Andrew Grinberg, California oil and gas manager for the environmental group Clean Water Action. “Unfortunately, <span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><span id="yiv6844099717yui_3_16_0_1_1454031794427_2671" class="yiv6844099717">[the<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></span>Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources] has already shown that they are unable to enforce existing laws.”</p></blockquote>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2016/02/01/environmentalists-use-porter-ranch-disaster-target-ca-fracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">86034</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brown declares emergency over gas leak</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2016/01/07/brown-declares-emergency-over-gas-leak/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2016/01/07/brown-declares-emergency-over-gas-leak/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Poulos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2016 15:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porter Ranch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern California Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gov. Jerry Brown]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=85514</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gov. Jerry Brown has intervened as activists, analysts and residents decried a massive ongoing leak in a Los Angeles-area gas pipeline. &#8220;More than two months after a natural gas leak began emitting large amounts of a]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img decoding="async" class="alignright  wp-image-85526" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Gas-leak.jpg" alt="Gas leak" width="502" height="335" srcset="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Gas-leak.jpg 1024w, https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Gas-leak-300x200.jpg 300w, https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Gas-leak-768x512.jpg 768w" sizes="(max-width: 502px) 100vw, 502px" />Gov. Jerry Brown has intervened as activists, analysts and residents decried a massive ongoing leak in a Los Angeles-area gas pipeline. &#8220;More than two months after a natural gas leak began emitting large amounts of a greenhouse gas near a wealthy neighborhood here, Gov. Jerry Brown declared a state of emergency on Wednesday, ordering California agencies to move as quickly as possible to resolve the issue after previous attempts to stem the flow of methane failed,&#8221; the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/07/us/california-governor-declares-emergency-over-los-angeles-gas-leak.html?_r=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reported</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;In declaring the state of emergency, Mr. Brown &#8212; who has been criticized by many residents for his slow reaction to the problem &#8212; reiterated all the state has been doing to help plug the leak and monitor air quality, as well as the state’s efforts to make sure the gas company paid for disruptions and damage caused by the leak,&#8221; the Times added.</p>
<h3>An environmental mess</h3>
<p>The disaster afflicting Porter Ranch, one of Los Angeles&#8217;s newest communities, has broken unflattering environmental records. Already &#8220;the largest recorded natural gas leak in California’s history,&#8221; <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/california-methane-gas-leak-more-damaging-than-deepwater-horizon-disaster-a6794251.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">according</a> to the Independent, the leak has been &#8220;expelling an estimated 110,000 lbs of methane into the atmosphere every hour: about a quarter of the state’s daily methane gas emissions.&#8221; Tim O’Connor, California director for the Environmental Defense Fund’s oil and gas program, told the Independent that the leak was &#8220;far greater than the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster&#8221; in its aggregate impact on greenhouse gas emissions.</p>
<p>Southern California Gas has conceded that its own judgment may well have been to blame for the breach. In a statement, the company revealed &#8220;it decided nearly 40 years ago against replacing an underground safety valve that could have cut off the gas leak when the storage tank first erupted in late October,&#8221; as the Fiscal Times <a href="http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2016/01/04/Did-Bad-Decision-40-Years-Ago-Lead-California-Gas-Leak" target="_blank" rel="noopener">observed</a>. &#8220;Executives of Southern California Gas apparently concluded it was too hard to find replacement parts for the valve and that the underground storage tank wasn’t close enough to homes to warrant the time and expense. Instead, they gambled that the cutoff valve would never be needed. Now they are struggling to contain runaway greenhouse gas emissions that could cost them hundreds of millions of dollars in damages and greatly contribute to climate change.&#8221;</p>
<h3>Fumes and fury</h3>
<p>The news has compounded outrage and frustration in Porter Ranch, where Southern California Gas has moved to help residents cope with &#8212; or flee &#8212; the fumes. &#8220;This is the biggest community and environmental disaster I’ve ever seen, bar none,&#8221; Mitchell Englander, the neighborhood&#8217;s representative on the Los Angeles City Council, <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-01-05/l-a-residents-flee-as-sempra-s-gas-leak-menaces-neighborhood" target="_blank" rel="noopener">told</a> Bloomberg. &#8220;Life there is not on hold &#8212; it’s on the edge and it’s on the brink of pandemonium. People are living with fear, uncertainty and doubt.&#8221; What residents remain have been plagued by discomfort and illness.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;A shopping center by the freeway still bustles, but the longest lines are at a storefront that Southern California Gas established to assist residents with relocation, health problems, air-filtration systems and claims. The smell of chemicals added to natural gas &#8212; which itself is colorless and odorless &#8212; pervades the air. Homes of residents who’ve already received relocation assistance sit vacant, while signs warn of increased police patrols to ward off looters. Some residents and visitors wear gas masks.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Health officials have issued reassurances that residents&#8217; symptoms, including dizziness and vomiting, were only temporary.</p>
<p>Gov. Brown himself arranged to meet neighborhood representatives. Paula Cracium, president of the Porter Ranch Neighborhood Council, told the Los Angeles Times &#8220;she and others at the meeting urged Brown to be more visible on the issue and to help with a major concern that will last long after the leak is plugged &#8212; declining property values.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2016/01/07/brown-declares-emergency-over-gas-leak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">85514</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-14 18:35:59 by W3 Total Cache
-->