<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nannygate &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/nannygate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 02:35:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>Meg&#039;s amateurish response</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/10/01/megs-amateurish-response-to-nannygate/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CalWatchdog Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 02:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics and Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meg Whitman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nannygate]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=9359</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[John Seiler: As I&#8217;ve been writing, despite spending more than $120 million (so far), Meg Whitman&#8217;s campaign is amateurish. The Nannygate scandal shows that. When the scandal broke, what she]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>John Seiler</em>: As <a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2010/07/19/lame-jerry-ad-vs-meg/">I&#8217;ve</a> been <a href="http://www.calwatchdog.com/2010/04/23/meg-vs-mcclintock/">writing</a>, despite spending more than $120 million (so far), Meg Whitman&#8217;s campaign is amateurish. The Nannygate scandal shows that.</p>
<p>When the scandal broke, what she should have said was, &#8220;I&#8217;ve been saying all along that I will create jobs for Latinos and Jerry Brown would destroy them. This is a great example. I hired a poor Latina and gave her $23 an hour. Now Jerry is attacking me for it! That&#8217;s because he wants to kill Latino jobs.&#8221;</p>
<p>That should be her only position. At the debate on Saturday on Univision, that should be her answer. If the question is, &#8220;How can you explain the Social Security letter for your maid?&#8221; Then Meg should respond, &#8220;I&#8217;ve been saying all along that I will create jobs for Latinos and Jerry Brown would destroy them,&#8221; etc.</p>
<p>And so on. Just stay on message.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t any Republicans campaign to win?</p>
<p>OCT. 1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">9359</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-11 01:11:04 by W3 Total Cache
-->