<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>permanent water conservation rules &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/permanent-water-conservation-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 17:34:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>Brutal long-term &#8216;mega-drought&#8217; a specter hanging over state</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2018/02/27/brutal-long-term-mega-drought-specter-hanging-state/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2018/02/27/brutal-long-term-mega-drought-specter-hanging-state/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Reed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 17:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california drought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mega-drought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sierra snowpack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought never ended]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american southwest mega-drought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30 year drought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permanent water conservation rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permafrost]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://calwatchdog.com/?p=95706</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Californians confronted with a bone-dry winter have to wonder if Gov. Jerry Brown and other state officials acted precipitously in April 2017 in declaring an end to the Golden State’s]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-83183" src="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Drought-e1519598698932.jpg" alt="" width="422" height="281" align="right" hspace="20" /><span style="font-weight: 400;">Californians confronted with a bone-dry winter have to wonder if Gov. Jerry Brown and other state officials acted precipitously in April 2017 in </span><a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/governor-declares-drought-in-california-is-over/2017/04/07/bb3995c8-1bdf-11e7-bcc2-7d1a0973e7b2_story.html?utm_term=.4486be4707a1" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">declaring</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> an end to the Golden State’s five-year drought. But there’s an even more ominous question to contemplate as well: Is the severe long-term “mega-drought” that some climate scientists predict for the American Southwest already under way?</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The drought second-guessing comes amid a near-record dry January and February. While most of the focus on the return of the drought has been on Southern California, downtown San Francisco and downtown Sacramento have also gotten </span><a href="http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-california-dry-february-20180223-story.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">close to negligible</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> precipitation this year.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Californians depend on the Sierra snowpack for significant amounts of water supply when it melts in spring and early summer. While overall conditions aren’t as dire as at the peak of the 2012-2017 state drought, some data are daunting. The Los Angeles Times </span><a href="http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-california-dry-february-20180223-story.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">reported</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> Friday that water in the Lake Tahoe region snowpack is one-fifth the average level seen in late February. Strikingly, at the Fallen Leaf measuring station at the 6,242-foot-level, the Times reported there was no snowpack at all.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">There was better news elsewhere. The National Weather Service told the Times that the snowpack at the Heavenly Valley site at the 8,534-foot elevation was nearly half of normal. The Hetch Hetchy reservoir in the Yosemite Valley was at 79 percent of capacity earlier this month, water officials said.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Still, the overall picture was troubling enough that state leaders are being urged to make permanent the unprecedented mandatory conservation rules </span><a href="https://www.gov.ca.gov/2015/04/01/news18913/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ordered</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> by the governor in 2015 and partly suspended in 2017. In an editorial last week, the San Francisco Chronicle </span><a href="https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/editorials/article/Editorial-California-must-make-water-12628580.php" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">called</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> for “strict 25 percent conservation orders for cities and towns, along with a long list of prohibitions for ordinary citizens and businesses.”</span></p>
<h3>30-year-plus drought in Southwest called possible</h3>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The skirmishing over conservation policies and second-guessing over whether it was premature to call the drought over last year are dominating the headlines for now. But some climate scientists warn that this short-term focus is questionable. They note that just as global warming has changed the basic weather patterns in Alaska by </span><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/08/23/climate/alaska-permafrost-thawing.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">thawing the permafrost</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> normally seen year-round in much of state, the American Southwest could face a harsh new default long-term weather pattern. On science websites, there’s a debate over whether the “mega-drought” that a February 2015 </span><a href="https://www.nasa.gov/press/2015/february/nasa-study-finds-carbon-emissions-could-dramatically-increase-risk-of-us" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">NASA study</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> warned about has already begun.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">According to Ben Cook, climate scientist at NASA&#8217;s Goddard Institute for Space Studies and the study’s lead author, &#8220;Natural droughts like the 1930s Dust Bowl and the current drought in the Southwest have historically lasted maybe a decade or a little less. … What these results are saying is we&#8217;re going to get a drought similar to those events, but it is probably going to last at least 30 to 35 years.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Cook put the current chances of the Southwest facing a drought that lasted more than 30 years at 12 percent.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Felix Kogan and Wei Guo of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, in a </span><a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282841258_2006-2015_mega-drought_in_the_western_USA_and_its_monitoring_from_space_data" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">paper published</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> in August 2015, argued that the dry weather seen in the Southwest from 2006-2015 already fit the definition of a “mega-drought.” The claim was based on how dry, hot conditions had created unusually heavy “</span><a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0176161796802872" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">vegetation stress</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">” – the negative effects that severe climate conditions can have on a plant’s metabolism, growth or development. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">“Among Western states, California was the most severely drought-affected, especially in 2014, when areas of stronger than moderate vegetation stress reached 70 percent,” Kogan and Guo wrote.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Last week, meeting in Sacramento, members of the state Water Resources Control Board put off for the time being a decision on whether to make the old drought conservation rules permanent.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">But the move looks inevitable. Water board chairwoman Felicia Marcus said at the meeting that such restrictions are “the least we should do,” according to an Associated Press </span><a href="https://www.apnews.com/5217fb0810c0477e8839dba5784c6a57" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">report</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2018/02/27/brutal-long-term-mega-drought-specter-hanging-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">95706</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-20 07:29:33 by W3 Total Cache
-->