<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Proposition 215 &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/proposition-215/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2017 02:08:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>CalWatchdog Morning Read &#8211; September 22</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2016/09/22/calwatchdog-morning-read-september-22/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CalWatchdog Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 16:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop. 13]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 215]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jail]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=91124</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Could felons soon vote from jail? Bad news for marijuana advocates More bad news for marijuana advocates Vehicle registration fees in SoCal may soon rise to fund smog reduction programs &#8220;Prop.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><em><strong><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignright  wp-image-79323" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/CalWatchdogLogo1.png" alt="CalWatchdogLogo" width="281" height="186" srcset="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/CalWatchdogLogo1.png 1024w, https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/CalWatchdogLogo1-300x198.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 281px) 100vw, 281px" />Could felons soon vote from jail?</strong></em></li>
<li><em><strong>Bad news for marijuana advocates</strong></em></li>
<li><em><strong>More bad news for marijuana advocates</strong></em></li>
<li><em><strong>Vehicle registration fees in SoCal may soon rise to fund smog reduction programs</strong></em></li>
<li><em><strong>&#8220;Prop. 13: It&#8217;s better if you&#8217;re wealthier&#8221;</strong></em></li>
</ul>
<p>Good morning. So close to Friday!</p>
<p>All eyes are on Jerry Brown as he continues to decide the fate of many, many bills. In fact, heightening the stakes in the criminal justice debate roiling the country at large, Brown could soon greenlight a law that would allow some state felons to vote from jail.</p>
<p>California has wound up in the middle of the pack on state laws around criminals and voting rights.</p>
<p><a href="http://calwatchdog.com/2016/09/21/gov-brown-sign-vote-jail-law/">CalWatchdog</a> has more.</p>
<p><strong>In other news:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>&#8220;Two women have been arrested on charges of holding four brothers captive at an illegal marijuana farm in Northern California and forcing them to work there for six months, police said Wednesday.&#8221; <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/2016/09/21/police-4-men-held-at-california-pot-farm-forced-to-work/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The San Jose Mercury News/AP</a> have more.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>&#8220;Tehama County sheriff&#8217;s detectives investigated 10 murders in 2014 and 2015 — twice as many as the three previous years combined. &#8216;Our last four homicides were all in what you would call Prop. 215 (marijuana grows),&#8217; said Sheriff Dave Hencratt, referring to large grows under the state&#8217;s medical marijuana law.&#8221; The <a href="http://www.redding.com/news/local/tehama-sheriff-marijuana-grows-drive-spike-in-murders-as-other-crimes-see-saw-3cf95465-ce36-1d45-e05-394363161.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Redding Record Searchlight</a> has more.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>&#8220;Air quality regulators are considering seeking an increase in vehicle registration fees for millions of Southern California drivers to help pay for smog reduction programs,&#8221; reports the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-smog-fees-20160921-snap-story.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Los Angeles Times</a>.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Almost 40 years after California voters passed Proposition 13 to rein in property tax increases, available data shows that wealthy Californians have benefited the most, according to a new report from the state Legislative Analyst’s Office. </p>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Legislature:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Gone &#8217;til December. </li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Gov. Brown:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>No public events announced.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Tips:</strong> matt@calwatchdog.com</p>
<p><strong>Follow us:</strong> @calwatchdog @mfleming</p>
<p><strong>New follower: </strong><a class="ProfileCard-screennameLink u-linkComplex js-nav" href="https://twitter.com/CasmirNmekam" data-aria-label-part="" data-send-impression-cookie="true" target="_blank" rel="noopener">@<span class="u-linkComplex-target">CasmirNmekam</span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">91124</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal appeals court protects CA medical marijuana use</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2016/08/18/federal-appeals-court-protects-ca-medical-marijuana-use/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2016/08/18/federal-appeals-court-protects-ca-medical-marijuana-use/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Reed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2016 21:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10 cases in California and Washington state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Reed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classified substance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal law on marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diarmuid O'Scannlain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 215]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=90585</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This November, California voters will vote on Proposition 64 and decide whether their state should become the third after Colorado and Washington to make it legal under state law for]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-weight: 400;"><img decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-84968" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Marijuana.jpg" alt="Marijuana" width="259" height="194" align="right" hspace="20" />This November, California voters will vote on </span><a href="https://ballotpedia.org/California_Marijuana_Legalization_Initiative,_Proposition_64_(2016)" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Proposition 64</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> and decide whether their state should become the third after Colorado and Washington to make it legal under state law for adults to smoke pot recreationally.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">But advocates of legal recreational marijuana use in the Golden State and everywhere in the United States got a sharp reminder last week that the federal government reserves the right to have the final say on whether legal pot is OK at the state level. The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration brushed aside years of lobbying and ruled that marijuana would</span><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/08/11/dea-marijuana-remains-illegal-under-federal-law/88550804/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;"> remain illegal</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> &#8212; still considered a Schedule 1 substance under the Controlled Substances Act and formally classified as having no medical use.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">Though the federal government continues to pursue charges against some individuals and some high-profile dispensaries &#8212; such as Oakland’s Harborside Medical Center &#8212; the Obama administration has said it will not attempt to overturn state marijuana laws. But any future administration could take punitive actions against states with laws allowing recreational or medicinal use, suing in federal court, withholding federal grants or more.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">However, a new federal court ruling offers some reassurance that no federal authority can pull the plug on state-approved medicinal pot use, at least.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">In a case involving 10 pending prosecutions in California and Washington state, the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a </span><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/court-bars-feds-prosecuting-medical-pot-cases-41431227" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">ruling </span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;">Tuesday that said the U.S. Justice Department cannot target marijuana growers, suppliers or users in cases where the drug is being used for medical purposes.</span></p>
<h4>Reagan appointee knocks Justice Department argument</h4>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The decision &#8212; written by a conservative Reagan appointee, Diarmuid O’Scannlain &#8212; cited language included by Congress in budget resolutions that bans federal interference with state medicinal marijuana laws. The language was first inserted into budget measures in 2014. So long as Congress continues to renew the ban on federal action &#8212; which has bipartisan support &#8212; medical users are protected.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">The Obama administration had argued that using federal laws to target medical marijuana users or suppliers wasn’t an intrusion on state law. O’Scannlain disagreed: “If the federal government prosecutes such individuals, it has prevented the state from giving practical effect to its law.”</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">A U.S. Justice Department official said no decision had been made yet on whether to appeal the ruling, which mirrored the finding in a previous case decided last year by U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer of San Francisco.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-weight: 400;">California became the first state to legalize medicinal use of marijuana with </span><a href="https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_215,_the_Medical_Marijuana_Initiative_(1996)" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="font-weight: 400;">Proposition 215</span></a><span style="font-weight: 400;"> in 1996.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2016/08/18/federal-appeals-court-protects-ca-medical-marijuana-use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">90585</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-15 13:46:55 by W3 Total Cache
-->