<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>public employee pay &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/public-employee-pay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2015 18:13:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>Controller Betty Yee publishes salary data for cities, counties</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/12/21/controller-betty-yee-publishes-salary-data-cities-counties/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/12/21/controller-betty-yee-publishes-salary-data-cities-counties/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2015 18:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget and Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Municipal Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Controller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public employee pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[betty yee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[betty t yee]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=85089</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Public employees at California cities and counties took home more than $36 billion in compensation last year, according to new payroll data released by the state&#8217;s chief fiscal officer. State Controller]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignright wp-image-85140 size-full" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Screen-Shot-2015-12-17-at-4.35.23-PM.png" alt="Screen Shot 2015-12-17 at 4.35.23 PM" width="498" height="435" srcset="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Screen-Shot-2015-12-17-at-4.35.23-PM.png 498w, https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Screen-Shot-2015-12-17-at-4.35.23-PM-252x220.png 252w" sizes="(max-width: 498px) 100vw, 498px" />Public employees at California cities and counties took home more than $36 billion in compensation last year, according to new payroll data released by the state&#8217;s chief fiscal officer.</p>
<p>State Controller Betty T. Yee disclosed the 2014 payroll data from 54 counties and 468 cities, which included information on more than 600,000 employees. The disclosure is part of the controller&#8217;s latest update to the &#8220;Government Compensation in California&#8221; website.</p>
<p>The open government online portal allows users to map compensation levels throughout the state, assemble charts, evaluate payroll trends and export data for in-depth statistical analysis.</p>
<h3>Vernon: Smallest City, Biggest Pay</h3>
<p>The state controller&#8217;s public employee payroll website has become a powerful tool for journalists and citizen watchdogs to identify wasteful spending and corruption in local government.</p>
<p>Among the municipalities with questionable payroll data from 2014: the city of Vernon. Although it is the least populous city in California, with just 123 residents, Vernon has <a href="http://publicpay.ca.gov/Reports/Cities/City.aspx?fiscalyear=2014&amp;entityid=240" target="_blank" rel="noopener">double number of employees</a>. And those employees earn $103,601 per year in salary &#8212; the highest average salary in the state. Vernon employees also take home, on average, another $32,462 per year in health and retirement benefits.</p>
<p>Vernon&#8217;s top salary is followed by the city of Hayward with $94,041 average salary, and Palm Desert at $89,582 in average salary. The state controller&#8217;s office notes that the average wages for city governments overall fell by 3 percent to $59,614.</p>
<p>In 2014, the average salary for county employees increased by approximately 3 percent to $60,993. At the county level, the nearly 19,000 employees at Santa Clara County received the highest average wage, earning $78,486 per year in wages and $27,655 in retirement and health benefits.</p>
<h3>9 Local Governments Fail to Disclose Data</h3>
<p>The controller&#8217;s office classified six cities as non-compliant entities for having &#8220;filed a compensation report that was incomplete, was in a format different than the one requested by the Controller&#8217;s Office, or was submitted after the reporting deadline.&#8221; San Francisco, the largest non-compliant entity joined the cities of Bell, Compton, Covina, Dana Point and Santa Ana on the list of non-compliant entities.</p>
<p>The counties of Modoc, Monterey and Riverside were the three counties, or 5.3 percent, that failed to file.</p>
<p>The city and county of Los Angeles remain the largest local government agencies. Los Angeles County employs 103,338 people with a cumulative wage of $7.2 billion in annual salary and $2.76 billion in health and retirement benefits. The city of Los Angeles paid out $4.5 billion in wages and $703 million in health and retirement benefits.</p>
<p>Yee&#8217;s latest disclosure builds on the work of her predecessor. In 2010, following the high-profile corruption case at the city of Bell, <a href="http://calwatchdog.com/2013/12/18/controller-chiangs-payroll-website-earning-praise-for-openness-transparency/">then-Controller John Chiang didn’t</a> wait around for local governments to clean up their act. He ordered cities, counties and special districts, under Government Code sections 12463 and 53892, to share salary and other wage information with his office. Initially, some local governments balked, then dragged their feet in disclosing the payroll data.</p>
<p>To access State Controller Betty Yee&#8217;s payroll database, go to <a href="http://publicpay.ca.gov" target="_blank" rel="noopener">publicpay.ca.gov</a>.<br />
<img decoding="async" class="alignright wp-image-85149 size-full" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Screen-Shot-2015-12-17-at-4.35.37-PM.png" alt="Screen Shot 2015-12-17 at 4.35.37 PM" width="495" height="443" srcset="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Screen-Shot-2015-12-17-at-4.35.37-PM.png 495w, https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Screen-Shot-2015-12-17-at-4.35.37-PM-246x220.png 246w" sizes="(max-width: 495px) 100vw, 495px" /></p>
<h3>Top 10 Highest County Employees in California</h3>
<p>1. Faculty Physician-Contract: $1,360,744<br />
Kern County</p>
<p>2.Faculty Physician-Contract: $1,295,929<br />
Kern County</p>
<p>3.Orthopedic Surgeon-Contract: $1,092,651<br />
Kern County</p>
<p>4. Chairman, Department of Surgery: $851,665<br />
Kern County</p>
<p>5. Medical Director II: $775,999<br />
Los Angeles County</p>
<p>6.Physician &#8211; VMC: $760,461<br />
Santa Clara County</p>
<p>7. Chief Physician III Surgery-Neurological: $728,489<br />
Los Angeles County</p>
<p>8. Physician: $727,864<br />
San Joaquin County</p>
<p>9. Physician &#8211; VMC: $684,365<br />
Santa Clara County</p>
<p>10. Physician &#8211; VMC: $658,745<br />
Santa Clara County</p>
<h3>Top 10 Highest City Employees in California</h3>
<p>1. Police Sergeant: $592,652<br />
City of Burbank</p>
<p>2. Fire Chief: $487,871<br />
City of Richmond</p>
<p>3. Chief Of Police: $487,644<br />
City of El Monte</p>
<p>4. City Manager: $470,249<br />
City of Lincoln</p>
<p>5. City Manager: $419,840<br />
City of West Covina</p>
<p>6. City Attorney: $412,211<br />
City of Escondido</p>
<p>7. Power Engineering Manager: $403,271<br />
City of Los Angeles</p>
<p>8. Assistant City Manager:<br />
$396,548<br />
City of Oxnard</p>
<p>9.City Manager: $395,501<br />
City of Escondido</p>
<p>10. Police Officer (PERS): $393,573<br />
City of Oakland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/12/21/controller-betty-yee-publishes-salary-data-cities-counties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">85089</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Special contracts allow &#8216;full-time&#8217; teachers to work for both union and district</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/07/07/teachers-collect-classroom-pay-unions-bidding/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/07/07/teachers-collect-classroom-pay-unions-bidding/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 14:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waste, Fraud, and Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dean Vogel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Employee Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teacher compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teacher union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public employee pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union contracts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Teachers Association]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=81499</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It’s been called “ghost teaching,” and it thrives in California. Full-time teachers are paid six-figure salaries to work for their union while keeping their school district seniority and pensions afloat.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/school-lockers.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-81505" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/school-lockers-300x199.jpg" alt="school lockers" width="300" height="199" srcset="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/school-lockers-300x199.jpg 300w, https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/school-lockers.jpg 640w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" /></a>It’s been called “ghost teaching,” and it thrives in California.</p>
<p>Full-time teachers are paid six-figure salaries to work for their union while keeping their school district seniority and pensions afloat. The dual work arrangements are built into union contracts.</p>
<p>“This has been going on for years, and it’s hard to know how widespread it is,” said Larry Sand, who has <a href="http://unionwatch.org/release-time-on-the-taxpayers-dime/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">spotlighted the arrangements at unionwatch.org</a> and heads the nonprofit California Teachers Empowerment Network. “It varies district by district and each contract has to be looked into. &#8230; A lot of the time, school board members don’t even know, or they are pressured by the unions to keep a policy in place.”</p>
<h3>Built into the contract</h3>
<p>As included in the <a href="http://www.sandi.net/cms/lib/CA01001235/Centricity/Domain/105/website_sdea_search_140805.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">teaching contract</a> at the San Diego Unified School District, “when negotiations with the District are scheduled during working hours, association representatives will be released from work without loss of pay.”</p>
<p>The <a href="http://bcsd.com/humanresources/files/2014/03/Beta-Contract-2012-2015.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">contract</a> in the Bakersfield City School District provides a full-time leave of absence for the teachers union president to tend to association business: “The president shall be paid in the usual manner as if he/she were a regular employee of the District and shall suffer no reduction in salary.”</p>
<p>And in the Fountain Valley School District in Orange County, the union president can devote <a href="http://www.fvsd.us/apps/download/2/uA2iTE5CUX3R045ppLmzPzumk28XUl0lGXl89dwBJyrHtqdb.pdf/Contract-FVEA-2015.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">one day per week</a> to union business, costing taxpayers up to $22,230 per year, according to unionwatch.org.</p>
<p>A union official who has received dual salaries said the arrangements are helpful.</p>
<p>“There is a lot of mutual benefit there,” said Michela Cichoki. “Some are teaching partners, and so there is a period of release for officers. And a lot of the time they are in meetings with the district, and they are teacher representatives on those committees, representing the teachers.”</p>
<p>In 2012, Cichoki received a <a href="http://www.guidestar.org/FinDocuments/2013/940/362/2013-940362310-0a7b7b1f-9O.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">pay package worth $242,754 for service as secretary-treasurer of the California Teachers Association</a>. The same year, Cichoki was <a href="http://transparentcalifornia.com/salaries/2012/school-districts/san-bernardino/san-bernardino-city-unified/cichocki-micaela-c/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">paid a package worth $118,818</a> from the San Bernardino City Unified School District for her work as a “hearing panel member.”</p>
<p>Cichoki’s case illustrates the complicated formula of reimbursement at the upper levels of the union/school district entanglement.</p>
<p>The union reimbursed the district for her package, although she was allowed to maintain her pension while gone by paying her share from her pocket.</p>
<p>“I was released from the school district while I was at CTA,” Cichoki said. “It’s in the [education] code that we can be released for union work, and the district can ask for reimbursement, and that comes from the union so that no taxpayer funds are paying for it.”</p>
<p>Dean Vogel, past president of the California Teachers Association, received a pay package worth $277,356 in 2012, the last year records are available. In 2013, while serving as president of the state’s teacher union, public records show he received<a href="http://transparentcalifornia.com/salaries/2013/school-districts/solano/vacaville-unified/vogel-dean-e/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> $97,542 for working on “special assignment” in the Vacaville Unified School District</a>.</p>
<p>The union may have reimbursed the district for Vogel’s pay package, as in the case of Cichoki. A spokeswoman for the CTA did not return calls.</p>
<h3>Union work should be kept separate</h3>
<p>Sand blames the local school board members for allowing teachers who should be in the classroom to instead conduct union work on taxpayer time.</p>
<p>“The school boards should be serving the public instead of serving the union,” Sand said.</p>
<p>The dual salary arrangements have drawn legal complaints in other states, similar to the noise being made by the teachers who contend they shouldn’t have to pay union dues that go to efforts they don’t support.</p>
<p>Some teachers also believe their union-connected colleagues shouldn’t be allowed to spend time outside the classroom when their job is to teach.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://articles.philly.com/2015-02-27/news/59547574_1_philadelphia-federation-district-employees-union-president-jerry-jordan" target="_blank" rel="noopener">lawsuit in Pennsylvania</a> challenges the arrangement in the Philadelphia School District, where up to 63 teachers are allowed to gain seniority, accrue pension benefits and receive insurance, just as they would as teachers, while engaging in union activities.</p>
<p><em>Steve Miller can be reached at 517-775-9952 and <a href="mailto:avalanche50@hotmail.com">avalanche50@hotmail.com</a>. His website is <a href="http://avalanche50.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">www.Avalanche50.com</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2015/07/07/teachers-collect-classroom-pay-unions-bidding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">81499</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>BART strike would provide needed clarity on compensation, union power</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/08/14/bart-strike-would-provide-needed-clarity/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/08/14/bart-strike-would-provide-needed-clarity/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Katy Grimes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 21:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BART]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bay Area Rapid Transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[average compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public sector vs. private sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Reed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public employee pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[$92 premiums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heritage Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katy Grimes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=47889</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If I was an advisor to Gov. Jerry Brown, I&#8217;d recommend he let the BART strike play out without government intervention. California would be much more governable if voters understood]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I was an advisor to Gov. Jerry Brown, I&#8217;d recommend he let the BART strike play out without government intervention. California would be much more governable if voters understood that collective bargaining is holding taxpayers hostage, and more exposure to BART power plays by organized labor can only hammer that home.</p>
<div title="Page 1">
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignright size-full wp-image-48004" alt="bart.job.action" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/bart.job_.action.jpg" width="330" height="255" align="right" hspace="20" srcset="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/bart.job_.action.jpg 330w, https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/bart.job_.action-300x231.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 330px) 100vw, 330px" />Instead, Brown announced Friday he will seek a court-ordered, two-month cooling-off period if a contract dispute threatens to stall commuter trains in the San Francisco Bay Area. Sunday, he <a href="http://calwatchdog.com/2013/08/12/art-laffer-dems-understands-taxes-too-high/" target="_blank">got his way</a>.</p>
<p>What does he expect to accomplish with another 60 days? What will negotiators do in 60 days that they cannot do now? This has been going on for months.</p>
<p>The situation is causing a ripple effect on peoples&#8217; lives and on both the Bay Area and the state economies.</p>
<h3>A &#8216;conversation&#8217; about high public pay</h3>
<p>Part of the concern surrounding BART is that in many cases the guy &#8220;driving&#8221; the BART train is making more than the guy sitting in the seat commuting to work in downtown San Francisco.</p>
<p>So if union leadership and sympathizers want to have a &#8220;conversation,&#8221; let&#8217;s have an honest one. The marketplace is out of kilter. According to the Heritage Foundation, private-sector employees <a href="http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/09/government-employees-work-less-than-private-sector-employees" target="_blank" rel="noopener">work longer hours</a>, and work harder. Private-sector employees typically have better education, and by necessity are entrepreneurial, seek to improve skills for advancement, and do it for about 30 percent less money. And there certainly are far fewer pay, benefit or pension guarantees.</p>
<p>The impetus behind this conversation is not jealousy; most just want public union employees such as BART &#8220;drivers&#8221; to be paid a fair wage for their skill set based on supply and demand. That&#8217;s not what happens in the current collective bargaining paradigm. It typically leaves the taxpayer on the short end of the stick because pay is a function of union power, and in California, unions are awfully powerful.</p>
<p>This is a key reason cities in California have been filing bankruptcy, and why<a href="http://watchdog.org/99256/is-california-really-back-10-cities-on-brink-of-bankruptcy/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> many more are on the brink</a>. Local government simply cannot afford these inflated salaries and particularly the benefits associated with them. Contrary to what union leadership would have us believe, compensation costs are not a minor problem, and there is not an unlimited source of taxpayer funds.</p>
<p><a href="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/bgovernmentworktimecomparisonchart2.gif"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-47928" alt="bgovernmentworktimecomparisonchart2" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/bgovernmentworktimecomparisonchart2-300x216.gif" width="300" height="216" /></a></p>
<h3>Just the facts, ma&#8217;am</h3>
<p>The Contra Costa Times has done a stellar job of reporting on the BART strike and negotiations, and even <a href="The data shows employees from the two striking unions make around $78,000 to $81,000, including overtime." target="_blank">published the data</a> on the salaries of striking BART workers.</p>
<p>Employees from the two striking unions make $78,000 to $81,000 on average annually, including overtime. (This average excludes police and executives at BART which would bring the average pay of a BART employee even higher.)But their gross compensation is much more generous than one might think from those figures. That&#8217;s because workers pay only $92 per month for health insurance, regardless of how many dependents are on the plan. And they do not contribute anything toward their pensions.</p>
<p>The unions threatening another strike are<a href="http://www.seiu1021.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> Service International Union Local 1021</a>, which represents 1,430 mechanics, custodians and clerical workers, and <a href="http://www.atu1555.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1555</a>, which represents 945 station agents, train operators and clerical workers.</p>
<p>In July, Alicia Trost, BART spokeswoman, &#8220;said management has moved a great deal since its initial offer to employees in the talks, which began on April 1,&#8221; <a href="http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Union-Leader-Says-BART-Contract-Talks-Tuesday-Were-Unproductive-217695751.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">NBC Bay Area News </a>reported. &#8220;She said management initially wanted to &#8216;take back&#8217; $140 million from employees in wages, retirement costs and health care costs but its most recent proposal would give them an additional $33 million over the next four years.&#8221;</p>
<p id="paragraph11">Trost also said in July, BART doubled its salary proposal to an 8 percent increase over four years (beyond regular step raises), lowered its pension contribution demand to 5 percent of salary after four years, and cut its medical premium contribution to less than what average public and private sector employees pay.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not remotely good enough for union leaders, who are asking for a 21.5 percent pay increase over three years and want to continue paying just $92 a month for health care and only want to make a 3 percent pension contribution at the end of three years, according to Trost, NBC Bay Area News <a href="http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/Union-Leader-Says-BART-Contract-Talks-Tuesday-Were-Unproductive-217695751.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">reported</a>.</p>
<p>Here are the current pay averages, <a href="http://www.contracostatimes.com/data/ci_23585525/bart-contract-proposals" target="_blank" rel="noopener">thanks to the Contra Costa Times</a>:</p>
<table width="654" cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td>Average Base*</td>
<td>Median Base*</td>
<td>Average Gross*</td>
<td>Median Gross*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AFSCME</td>
<td>$91,371.29</td>
<td>$93,060.11</td>
<td>$104,392.04</td>
<td>$104,392.04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ATU</td>
<td>$56,184.97</td>
<td>$62,614.00</td>
<td>$78,369.22</td>
<td>$77,782.57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>BPMA</td>
<td>$106,271.37</td>
<td>$109,638.48</td>
<td>$145,137.39</td>
<td>$142,576.74</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>BPOA</td>
<td>$74,170.49</td>
<td>$77,735.09</td>
<td>$98,864.11</td>
<td>$93,940.11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SEIU</td>
<td>$63,529.55</td>
<td>$73,410.40</td>
<td>$77,587.35</td>
<td>$80,504.36</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Non-Union</td>
<td>$106,006.04</td>
<td>$107,768.96</td>
<td>$110,936.99</td>
<td>$113,619.45</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>* Averages based on the 2012 pay of employees on the books as of July 2, 2013. <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/salaries/bay-area/2012?Entity=Bay%20Area%20Rapid%20Transit" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Click here for a complete list of 2012 BART employee salaries.</a></p>
<p>The BART employees may get their increase, but at what cost to their community? To their state? What other costs will go up because of this? Will all transit workers in the state demand the same? One union success provides the impetus for others to gouge taxpayers to satisfy their greed.</p>
</div>
<h3>The truth? It&#8217;s an assault on the middle class</h3>
<p><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="alignright size-full wp-image-47609" alt="unionpowerql4" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/unionpowerql4.jpg" width="313" height="320" align="right" hspace="20" srcset="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/unionpowerql4.jpg 313w, https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/unionpowerql4-293x300.jpg 293w" sizes="(max-width: 313px) 100vw, 313px" />Allowing BART employees higher salaries and benefits on their already-high compensation will only result in increasing costs and increased fares for the riders.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s too easy to negotiate with other people&#8217;s money, and even easier to end up giving it away.</p>
<div title="Page 2">
<p>The best summary I&#8217;ve read on the problem and solution is from a KQED reader who left this <a href="http://blogs.kqed.org/newsfix/2013/08/09/106379/BART-strike-transportation" target="_blank" rel="noopener">comment</a>:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;This debate is between taxpayers and labor. Management has zero skin in the game as does Jerry [Brown](except that he owes the same unions that helped get him elected).</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em></em><em>&#8220;Strike now &#8212; PLEASE. Let&#8217;s get on with it and cease this pretense of trying to &#8216;help&#8217;. </em><em>The sooner we start labor digging into its personal bank account of vacation time and savings to pay day-to-day bills during what &#8212; very hopefully &#8212; will be a very lengthy and extended strike, the sooner we interject an ounce of common sense into the discussion.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em></em><em>&#8220;This the ONLY dynamic which will force labor to re-think its position.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em></em><em>&#8220;Anything less is just an attempt to soften taxpayers willingness to pay these guys more.&#8221;</em></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/08/14/bart-strike-would-provide-needed-clarity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">47889</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-15 08:43:41 by W3 Total Cache
-->