“‘Veteran Journalist’ Joins Kerry as Staff at State Department,” the headline reads today on the Weekly Standard. t Douglas Frantz  joined the State Department as assistant secretary of state for public affairs.

“Frantz, who had previously spent more than three decades at publications such as The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times, returned to journalism in May 2012 as The Washington Post’s national security editor,” the Standard reported.

It would be interesting go back through Frantz’s stories and see if there was a detectable political agenda in his reporting while he was priming for his job at the State Department. It’s difficult not to discount much of what he wrote prior to joining the Kerry staff.

The Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics specifically says:

“Journalists should be free of obligation to any interest other than the public’s right to know.

“Journalists should:

“* Avoid conflicts of interest, real or perceived.

“* Remain free of associations and activities that may compromise integrity or damage credibility.

“* Refuse gifts, favors, fees, free travel and special treatment, and shun secondary employment, political involvement, public office and service in community organizations if they compromise journalistic integrity.

“* Disclose unavoidable conflicts.

“* Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable.”

The line is blurred

The line between journalism and political activism has become blurred. This might be startling news if it wasn’t the norm. With the recent history of media layoffs and downsizing, journalists leave newspapers and television stations in droves these days… for the comfort of government.

How can a journalist hold government, agencies and politicians accountable if he’s got his eye on a job working for the politician or government agency?

Are they acting as mere government functionaries? This could explain how the American media have largely abandoned the mission “to seek the truth and report it,” and “distinguish between advocacy and news reporting.”

California fourth estate

In California’s capitol, I have counted more than 40 former news reporters, television reporters and radio newscasters who now work inside the state Capitol, or for a state agency.

The most recent defection from the Capitol press corps is Steve Harmon, former news reporter for the Contra Costa Times. Harmon was recently hired as the communications director for Assemblywoman Nora Campos, D-San Jose, Speaker pro Tempore of the Assembly.

But Harmon is not alone. There are at least 30 other former reporters who have recently worked or still work inside the Capitol.

A few highlights…

The California Senate Office of Oversight and Outcomes a department created by Sen. President pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, and staffed with former news reporters and investigative journalists.

Nancy Vogel, covered state government as a reporter for the Los Angeles Times. She also worked at The Sacramento Bee, “covering various issues, including water policy, from 1990 to 2000.” Then Vogel took a job with the Senate Office of Oversight and Outcomes as a principal consultant. Her colleagues at the Senate Office of Oversight and Outcomes were John Hill, formerly a reporter with The Sacramento Bee, and Mark Arax, a former reporter for the Los Angeles Times.

Vogel now works for the Department of Water Resources as the Director of Public Affairs.

Philip J. Trounstine, a former San Jose Mercury News reporter, was hired by Democratic Gov. Gray Davis as communications director, then went back to journalism as co-publisher and co-editor of political blog Calbuzz.com.

Kate Folmar was a Capitol Bureau reporter for the San Jose Mercury News and the MediaNews Group newspaper company, then was hired as U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer’s press secretary. Folmar next worked as the political communications coordinator for the California Democratic Party, and served as spokeswoman for Secretary of State Debra Bowen, a Democrat.

Max Vanzi, former Los Angeles Times reporter, was hired by the California State Senate Office of Research. [Note: The spelling of Vanzi’s first name was corrected from an earlier version.]

Paul Hefner, formerly with the LA Daily News, was hired by former Controller Steve Westly and former Assembly Speaker Bob Hertzberg, both Democrats.

Carlos Alcala, former Sacramento Bee reporter, now works for Assemblyman Tom Ammiano, D-San Francisco.

Mark Hedlund, a former reporter for KXTV in Sacramento, is now working as the spokesman for Democratic State Sen. Pres. pro Tem Darrell Steinberg.

Eric Bailey, former Los Angeles Times reporter, is the Communications Director at the Consumer Attorneys of California.

The list is long and plentiful.

UPDATE:  John Adkisson of the Senate office called with a correction in this article. He said Mark Arax never went to work for the Senate Office of Oversight and Outcomes.

In 2009, Arax sent out an announcement that he was going to work as a Senior Policy Director for Sen. Dean Flores, doing investigative and research work. “I will continue to do what I’ve been doing all my adult life: search out the nooks and crannies of California and find the hidden stories about our institutions, our farmers and farm workers, our food safety and air quality,” Arax said. “Instead of reporting to newspaper readers, I’ll be reporting to the political leaders of the Senate majority. I’m looking forward to working with Senator Florez and Senator Steinberg, two Valley boys like me, and their fine staffs.  I see it as another great avenue to bring about important change.”

Katy Grimes: A story in the Sacramento Bee Saturday reported that Israel’s liberal press is on the ropes. But the McClatchy writer’s conclusions about why are laughable.

“The economic crisis that’s hit the newspaper industry in the United States and elsewhere is threatening some of Israel’s most influential publications and could soon leave the country with virtually no left-leaning printed newspapers,” the Bee reported.

The economic crisis had very little to do with the decline of newspapers in America. The crisis is one of content.

The number of newspaper readers has been declining for many years. Even with the decline in readership, many big newspapers refuse to accept blame or responsibility.

Far too many newspapers continue to publish biased, highly subjective stories, in place of news content. The opinion pages have melded with the news pages, with many newspapers no longer making the distinction.

“Unlike in the United States, where most news outlets strive for objectivity, Israeli papers take political stands in their news pages,” the McClatchy writer stated.

Oh, there’s no bias in that statement. It’s just laughable, but many reporters actually believe this.

“Publishers say that competition with the Internet, as in the rest of the world, is one reason for their decline.”

Pardon me while I choke back the tears.

What we have today is a mainstream media in denial. Perhaps the Internet is to blame. More people than ever hunger for information, and many don’t want it filtered or biased. Political junkies know that most newspapers are only a jumping-off point for the real story. The Internet has provided people with a way to access the rest of the story, as radio giant Paul Harvey used to say.

“Are Israelis aware that they are reading a paper that is practically in Netanyahu’s pocket? Sure they are,” said Didi Remez, a left-wing Israeli political activist, the Bee reported.

Are Americans aware that they are reading newspapers and listening to mainstream television media that is practically in President Barack Obama’s pocket?

The Media Research Center reported:

“As even former NBC anchor Tom Brokaw acknowledged today, liberal journalists were loaded and ready to pronounce this election over and Romney’s campaign dead after the first debate: ‘If it had been Romney performing like the president last night, it would have been over.’ But the beating Obama received last night was so complete that virtually no one (the New York Times excepted, as usual) denied it.

But how did they report Obama lost? Therein lies the rub: they — as well as Democratic operatives — are pushing the spin that this was all about style and presentation. Obama was “flat,” “lackluster,” “not himself,” and “not firing on all cylinders.” In other words, Obama wasn’t Obama last night. Some are going further, pushing the narrative that Romney was somehow mean-spirited and even deceptive in his presentation.

This analysis denies reality. Obama lost on style, to be sure. More importantly, much more importantly, he lost on content. Romney crushed him. For the first time in his political career Obama a) had to defend his record and  b) had no one running interference on his behalf. Romney as challenger had a seemingly endless list of particulars to choose from and did so in a devastating manner. That, that was the damage done to Obama.”

If this is still unclear, try these interesting examples:

Media Reality Check: ABC’s George Stephanopoulos: Reliably Crowning Democrats as Debate Winners 

Media Reality Check: ABC, CBS, NBC Hype Romney Hidden Camera Tape, Bury Obama’s ‘Redistribution’ Clip 

Media Reality Check: Convention Slant: NBC Donates 25 Percent More Airtime to DNC Than RNC 

Special Report: The Media’s “Miracle” of a Scandal-Free Obama 

Media Bias 101: What Journalists Really Think — and What the Public Thinks About Them 

Profiles in Bias: Documenting the Bias of Top Journalists and Major News Stories 

and here.