<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>San Mateo County &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/san-mateo-county/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 06:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>Public pension struggles roil CA</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/11/18/public-pension-struggles-roil-ca/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/11/18/public-pension-struggles-roil-ca/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Poulos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Mateo County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strategic Growth Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adult employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Deasy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=70463</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The public pensions crisis has not subsided in California &#8212; nor has the conflict that surrounds it. A waves of political, legal and policy developments have kept the issue at the center]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignright size-medium wp-image-67208" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Pension-reform-shredded-Cagle-Wolverton-Aug.-25-2014-300x200.jpg" alt="Pension reform shredded, Cagle, Wolverton, Aug. 25, 2014" width="300" height="200" srcset="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Pension-reform-shredded-Cagle-Wolverton-Aug.-25-2014-300x200.jpg 300w, https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Pension-reform-shredded-Cagle-Wolverton-Aug.-25-2014.jpg 600w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />The public pensions crisis has not subsided in California &#8212; nor has the conflict that surrounds it. A waves of political, legal and policy developments have kept the issue at the center of the state&#8217;s attention. In addition to a key election and a closely-watched lawsuit, a new initiative out of Sacramento has focused the pension debate on three general areas: municipal law, state law and public opinion.</p>
<p>Of the several California cities where pension reform emerged as the sharpest political issue, San Jose faced some of the most pointed combat. Pension reform drove this month&#8217;s close election for mayor, which pitted Supervisor Dave Cortese &#8212; the union-backed candidate &#8212; against Councilman Sam Liccardo, who was allied to outgoing Mayor Chuck Reed.</p>
<p>The lines were the city&#8217;s pension reforms in<a href="http://ballotpedia.org/San_Jose_Pension_Reform,_Measure_B_(June_2012)" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> Measure B</a>, approved by over two-thirds of San Jose voters in 2012. As The Wall Street Journal observed, however, Liccardo&#8217;s Democratic pedigree was <a href="http://www.kylinpoker.com/texas_holdem_online_games.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener">德州扑克在线游戏</a> enough to help turn back Cortese&#8217;s challenges to the Reed legacy.</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/articles/silicon-valleys-reform-breakthrough-1415666423" target="_blank" rel="noopener">According</a> to the Journal, &#8220;San Jose’s pension reforms are among the boldest in the country because they modify benefits for current workers in addition to future hires.&#8221; In the world of pension policy, that approach has sparked a virtual panic among defenders of the status quo. Wherever such changes have been proposed, critics have warned that public-sector employees would essentially abandon their jobs; in San Jose, reported the Journal, &#8220;the city’s police union faulted the pension reforms for a putative &#8216;exodus&#8217; of officers and a crime wave,&#8221; even though &#8220;property and violent crime rates have fallen since 2012.&#8221;</p>
<p>Liccardo recently put an optimistic face on his goal of fully funding annual health care obligations for retirees. He saw &#8220;plenty of common ground,&#8221; he <a href="http://calpensions.com/2014/11/17/san-jose-pension-reform-new-players-new-ruling/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">told</a> KQED. &#8220;We have new opportunities going forward, and I’ll be talking with the heads of our police union and certainly with the rank and file about how we can find common ground.&#8221; But Reed cautioned  he expects more union-driven legal challenges ahead.</p>
<h3>A tug of war in Stockton</h3>
<p>Although smaller in size than San Jose, Stockton&#8217;s battles over pensions have also been closely watched, on account of the city&#8217;s struggle through bankruptcy proceedings. A recent pair of rulings by bankruptcy judge Christopher Klein heightened the drama surrounding Stockton&#8217;s attempts to meet its pension obligations with a minimum of fuss.</p>
<p>First, Klein held that it would be unconstitutional should pension funds go completely untouched against a city&#8217;s will. But then he ruled  Stockton&#8217;s planned agreement on the bankruptcy was properly structured, despite leaving pensions largely intact.</p>
<p>The careful decision left reform opponents with half a loaf: on the one hand, cities had the right to touch pensions, violating the unofficial so-called &#8220;California Rule&#8221; that traditionally kept them sacrosanct; but on the other, the California Public Employee Retirement System, which filed legal objections to any pension changes, was basically free and clear.</p>
<p>Stockton&#8217;s private creditors, by contrast, took a big haircut &#8212; a setback all of them accepted, with one exception. Upsetting Stockton&#8217;s delicate balance of interests, Franklin Templeton Investments has filed an appeal of Klein&#8217;s second ruling. With a total of $36 million in loans sunken into Stockton &#8212; which has paid CalPERS $29 million a year and counting &#8212; Franklin was set to receive just 12 cents per dollar on its investments, according to the city&#8217;s bankruptcy plan, <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/news/business/article3932965.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">according</a> to the Sacramento Bee.</p>
<p>Echoing the dire predictions made in San Jose, the Bee reported, Stockton city officials and CalPERS warned that cutting pensions would touch off a &#8220;mass exodus by police officers and other city workers.&#8221; Franklin, however, argued  there simply wasn&#8217;t adequate proof that pension revisions would collapse key public services &#8212; and that basic fairness required its share of the bankruptcy burden be lessened. Now, that argument will go to the 9th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in Pasadena.</p>
<h3>New transparency</h3>
<p>Meanwhile, overarching the city-by-city conflict, a potentially game-changing development has emerged from Sacramento, where incoming Treasurer John Chiang announced a new website designed to supply citizens with the gory details of California&#8217;s accumulated pension obligations.</p>
<p>Available at <a href="http://ByTheNumbers.sco.ca.gov" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ByTheNumbers.sco.ca.gov</a>, the data has given Californians sudden access to about a million items of pension information, from fiscal years 2002-03 to 2012-13, according to the Los Angeles Times.</p>
<p>Announcing the site, the Times reported, Chiang expressed his hope the research would &#8220;empower greater citizen participation in how government handles a policy matter which is central to California&#8217;s long-term prosperity.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/11/18/public-pension-struggles-roil-ca/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">70463</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>S. Mateo DA vs. TSA Gropers</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2010/11/18/s-mateo-da-could-prosecute-tsa-gropers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CalWatchdog Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 20:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gropers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Mateo County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Wagstaffe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TSA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=11012</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[John Seiler: In this video, San Mateo D.A. Steve Wagstaffe says he will prosecute TSA officials if they sexually abuse passengers: Nov. 18, 2010]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Seiler:</p>
<p>In this video, San Mateo D.A. Steve Wagstaffe says he will prosecute TSA officials if they sexually abuse passengers:</p>
<p><object id="otvPlayer" width="400" height="268"><param name="movie" value="http://cdn.abclocal.go.com/static/flash/embeddedPlayer/swf/otvEmLoader.swf?version=&#038;station=kgo&#038;section=&#038;mediaId=7793393&#038;cdnRoot=http://cdn.abclocal.go.com&#038;webRoot=http://abclocal.go.com&#038;configPath=/util/&#038;site=" ></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><param name="allowNetworking" value="all"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param></object></p>
<p>Nov. 18, 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">11012</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-20 01:48:59 by W3 Total Cache
-->