This opens a new front in Silicon Valley’s push for a much bigger tech emphasis in California’s public schools. The Golden State is one of the 25 states that don’t require passing a computer science class to get a high school degree, resisting a national trend.

Sunday’s San Jose Mercury-News has details:

It’s the backbone of Silicon Valley’s world-changing tech industry, but — like journalism and geography — computer science is considered just another high school elective by the University of California.

 

Now, a powerful coalition of technology leaders, state politicians and high school teachers has taken aim at the university’s influential set of high school courses required for admission, pressuring UC to count computer science as advanced math, alongside calculus and statistics.

 

They say elevating computer science would encourage more California high schools to offer it — and more students to sign up … .

 

“My kids learn how the Internet works from the ground up; they learn how to program. It’s mathematical thinking,” said Karen Hardy, a computer science teacher at Wilcox High in Santa Clara.

 

Like many others, Hardy believes UC’s stance is holding back California schools. “I feel like we’re in the Dark Ages,” she said.

Gender, racial disparities cited in who takes classes

The Los Angeles Times’ coverage of Newsom’s letter emphasized …

… concern about the gender and racial gap of those taking courses and pursuing computer science as a profession.

 

According to data cited in the letter, fewer than 9,000 California high school students took the Advanced Placement Computer Science exam in 2015. Of those students, only about 2,300 were girls, less than 1,000 were Latinos and about 150 were black.

 

According to state data, meanwhile, salaries for computing jobs are high — averaging an annual $105,622 — but the number of graduates in the field are not expected to meet workforce demands.

But it’s not just schools in poor communities or rural areas that aren’t providing access to computer science. According to Re/Code, fewer than 5 percent of high school students in San Francisco took computer science in the 2014-15 school year, with a lack of classes seen as why.

Here’s a partial list of the executives who co-signed the letter with Newsom: Facebook Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg, Salesforce.com CEO Marc Benioff, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, LinkedIn Chairman Reid Hoffman, Sequoia Capital Chairman Michael Moritz, Zynga CEO Mark Pincus and Jerry Yang, co-founder of Yahoo!.

Other signatories included California Secretary of State Alex Padilla, Eloy Ortiz Oakley, superintendent-president of Long Beach City College, and Republican Assembly Leader Kristin Olsen.

Newsom is a member of the UC Board of Regents as part of his duties as lieutenant governor.

By JOHN HRABE

Facebook’s Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg is one of the country’s top executives. Under her tenure, the company has increased its user base tenfold—to more than 750 million users worldwide. That’s to be expected from someone with her pristine resume. She’s spent time at Google, the U.S. Treasury Department and Harvard Business School.

Thanks to Facebook’s Feb. 1 filing for an IPO, we now know exactly how much the company’s second-in-command earns for all her hard work: a respectable base salary of $300,000 per year. Not bad, but she could be doing a little bit better, if only she were in the public sector.

According to data from the Cal State University Chancellor’s office, the average base salary for Cal State presidents is a whopping $300,541. That means Sandberg, one of the private sector’s most accomplished executives, earns less money in base pay than the average base pay of the presidents of the state’s 23 Cal State campuses.

Just like Sandberg, these taxpayer-funded executives receive added perks and bonuses in addition to their base pay. Each Cal State president receives up to $60,000 per year in a housing allowance and $12,000 per year for a car allowance. The average presidential compensation package totals $372,000 per year. Who is responsible for this excessive compensation?

Cal State Trustees: The Public Sector’s Board of Directors

The Cal State University’s Board of Trustees, the equivalent of a corporate board of directors, sets the pay and compensation of university presidents. Earlier this year, the board explained its newly revised compensation policies. The board took up the matter only after public outcry following the trustees’ approval of a $400,000 annual salary for San Diego State University President Elliot Hirshman.

“The new compensation limits and more relevant tiered list of comparator institutions will give stakeholders a good benchmark of where presidential compensation will be set as we move forward,” Board Chairman Herbert Carter said in the press release, which listed the University of Southern California, Rutgers and Tufts University as comparator institutions.

State Sen. Leland Yee, D-San Francisco, who is arguably the legislature’s higher-education watchdog, isn’t buying into the Cal State’s phony executive compensation reforms. He told the San Francisco Chronicle in January that public institutions shouldn’t be cash cows for executives.

“While I am pleased to see CSU Board of Trustees finally recognize that their past executive compensation practices were completely unacceptable, their new policy just doesn’t go far enough,” Yee said in a recent press release.  “Those making hundreds of thousands of dollars should not receive double-digit pay increases during bad budget times or when students are forced to foot the bill.”

I recently asked a spokeswoman for the Cal State system to justify the excessive compensation for Cal State executives.

“When you look at anybody’s salary, including presidents of public institutions, you need to look at the marketplace,” Claudia Keith, assistant vice chancellor of public affairs at Cal State wrote to me via email.

Which Marketplace Exactly?

Carter believes that the Cal State system should recruit and retain the best leaders. “Our continued goal is to recruit and compete for the best leadership possible, but also within articulated budget guidelines,” he said in a January press release.

Facebook executive Sandberg’s resume certainly qualifies her to lead a minuscule operation like a Cal State campus. After all, Cal State Los Angeles has fewer than 16,000 undergraduate students, or .002% of Facebook’s user base. Yet, Cal State LA’s chief executive, President James Rosser, earns $25,000 more per year than Sandberg.

Ultimately, students and taxpayers foot the bill for higher education’s highly compensated executives. Since 2004, the CSU Board of Trustees has increased tuition by more than 155 percent. In 2004, CSU undergraduate tuition was a bargain at $2,334 per year. This fall, incoming freshmen will pay just under $6,000 per academic year.

Hallmark of Bad Leadership

Business guru Warren Bennis, who heads the University of Southern California’s Leadership Institute, has written the book, “On Becoming a Leader.” His second lesson of leadership is to “accept responsibility and blame no one.” You’d expect the Cal State University system to be familiar with the book. Remember, they listed the University of Southern California as a comparator institution in their search for the “best leadership possible.”

“The board has had to raise tuition, not because of executive salaries, but because state funding for the CSU has been cut by a $1 billion over the past three years,” Keith said.

In other words, “Don’t blame us. It’s the Legislature’s fault.”