<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Stephanopolous &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/stephanopolous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 14:30:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>2012&#8217;s October surprise: Media&#8217;s decision to ignore Benghazi lies</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/11/06/not-done-yet/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/11/06/not-done-yet/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CalWatchdog Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 14:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics and Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Reed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maviglio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephanopolous]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.calwatchdog.com/?p=34253</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nov. 6, 2012 By Chris Reed As a libertarian who still seethes over Newt Gingrich&#8217;s and George W. Bush&#8217;s betrayal of small-government conservatism, I have tons of issues with the]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nov. 6, 2012<br />
By Chris Reed</p>
<p>As a libertarian who still seethes over <a href="http://www.unitedliberty.org/articles/9188-how-speaker-newt-gingrich-betrayed-the-republican-revolution" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Newt Gingrich&#8217;s</a> and <a href="http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/bush-betrayal" target="_blank" rel="noopener">George W. Bush&#8217;s</a> betrayal of small-government conservatism, I have tons of issues with the modern Republican Party. But I have to say the GOP has my sympathy most national elections because of my incensed reaction to the heavy-handed bias of the national media.</p>
<p>Here we go again.</p>
<p>Who could have imagined that 2012&#8217;s October surprise would be the mainstream media simply choosing to ignore a huge geopolitical scandal on the president&#8217;s watch? It is now a matter of public record that within a day of the Sept. 11 murders of four Americans in Benghazi, the administration had vast signs it was an organized act of terror. Yet two weeks later, in a speech to the U.N., Barack Obama repeatedly suggested it was a spontaneous assault triggered by a YouTube video.</p>
<p>This is cut and dried &#8212; an administration caught peddling lies to cover up incompetence and worse. This isn&#8217;t complex. It&#8217;s Scandal 101.</p>
<p>But not according to ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, The New York Times and The Washington Post.</p>
<p>Occasionally, when I kid a liberal member of the media about how in the tank the national media are, I get an honest acknowledgement that this is undeniable.</p>
<p>But sometimes I get pushback. The last few weeks, whenever that has happened, I&#8217;ve sent along a transcript of ABC News&#8217; <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/10/04/Stephanopoulos-embarrasses-himself-spins-debate-as-tie" target="_blank" rel="noopener">coverage of the aftermath</a> of the first debate. Why? To highlight George Stephanopolous&#8217; &#8220;analysis&#8221;:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong></strong><em>STEPHANOPOLOUS:  Does a tie go to the challenger?</em></p>
<p>Wow. The pivotal event that revived Mitt Romney and made this a very, very close election, and within minutes of its conclusion, ABC News is spinning it as a tie. Is Stephanopolous the Greek word for Maviglio?</p>
<p>But that&#8217;s just one journalist. The media&#8217;s de facto/tacit cover-up of the administration&#8217;s Benghazi cover-up involves literally dozens of journalists at many different institutions suddenly deciding to go soft on a debacle at the upper reaches of the U.S. government so as to protect the guilty. It&#8217;s a sad comment on American journalism.</p>
<p>And maybe I&#8217;m naive, but I still have been surprised by this. Benghazi, I thought, was too big a screw-up to be ignored. Even when they were inclined to be in the tank, there were standards, I thought, for the well-educated, highly paid, prideful Washington media.</p>
<p>Boy, was I wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2012/11/06/not-done-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">34253</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-14 15:54:15 by W3 Total Cache
-->