<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tim Sheehan &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/tim-sheehan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:52:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>Bullet-train coverage: All the happy talk that fits</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/12/18/55551/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/12/18/55551/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Reed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullet train]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Reed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fresno Bee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-speed rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Michael Kenny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Sheehan]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=55551</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Fresno Bee&#8217;s editorial page has cheered longer and harder for the bullet-train project than just about any newspaper in the state. But has this enthusiasm affected news coverage? A]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fresno Bee&#8217;s editorial page has cheered longer and harder for the bullet-train project than just about any newspaper in the state. But has this enthusiasm affected news coverage? A <a href="http://www.fresnobee.com/2013/12/17/3672421/soil-drilling-begins-in-fresno.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">story</a> in Wednesday&#8217;s paper should make Fresno Bee readers wonder. Reporter Tim Sheehan writes about a new development:<br />
<img decoding="async" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-55556" alt="FresnoBee" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/FresnoBee.png" width="395" height="60" align="right" hspace="20" srcset="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/FresnoBee.png 395w, https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/FresnoBee-300x45.png 300w" sizes="(max-width: 395px) 100vw, 395px" /></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;Geologists began drilling holes and collecting soil sam- ples Tuesday in downtown Fresno in preparation for the first stages of construction on California&#8217;s proposed high-speed train project.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;The first soil borings by Earth Mechanics Inc. took place along H Street, under the Stanislaus Street overpass that spans H Street, the Union Pacific Railroad tracks and G Street. It&#8217;s the first of more than two dozen locations between the northeast edge of Madera and the south end of Fresno where the company will test the subsurface soil conditions.</em></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>&#8220;The tests offer a mole&#8217;s-eye view to geologists, and the results will help engineers determine what kind of foundations will be required for new overpasses and other structures needed for the first 29-mile stretch of high-speed rail construction, said Michael Hoshiyama, a staff geologist with Orange County-based EMI.&#8221;</em></p>
<h3>Where never is heard a discouraging word</h3>
<p>But in 650 words, the Fresno Bee story never:</p>
<p>1) mentions the huge court setbacks that imperil the project. The reader would never know it&#8217;s in trouble just from this story.</p>
<p>2) quotes a project opponent about the wisdom of spending one dime on a project with an illegal business plan and an irreconcilable $25 billion shortfall.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s going on here?</p>
<p>Maybe Sheehan doesn&#8217;t want to be seen as a &#8220;naysayer&#8221; by Fresno Bee bosses. That&#8217;s the label the paper&#8217;s editorial page stuck on Central Valley congressional critics of the project back in April. Criticism isn&#8217;t valid, you see. It&#8217;s just &#8220;naysaying.&#8221;</p>
<p>Fresno residents deserve better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2013/12/18/55551/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">55551</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-15 09:13:43 by W3 Total Cache
-->