By Chris Reed

The push is on to gut Proposition 13, with the nominal rationale being the urgent need to help public education by making it easier to pass parcel taxes. But will the Democratic lawmakers behind this first do anything about two huge education finance scandals? I explore this topic here.

The first is one that got international attention earlier this year after revelations that the Poway Unified School District had borrowed $105 million using capital appreciation bonds (CABs) at a long-term cost of $981 million. Why are CABs so insanely expensive? Because the interest on them builds for 20 years before the district contractually can begin to pay them off. …. 200 California school districts … have used these bonds. ….

[The less-known] second school-finance scandal [is] the increasing practice of districts all over the state of using 30-year “construction bond” borrowing to pay for routine maintenance, short-lived electronics and other needs that are supposed to be paid for by the operating budget [such as] San Diego Unified buying nearly 100,000 laptops and iPads with bonds that won’t be fully repaid until 2039.

“There are restrictions in current statutes,” [state Sen. Mark] Leno said. If 30-year bonds are being spent this way, “they’re not being used as they should. … That’s not a formula that’s sustainable.”

However, state Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson said in an interview last month that he considered this use of bond funds understandable because of school budget woes.

On the first scam, I believe that state Treasurer Bill Lockyer’s outrage will lead to constructive change. But Torlakson’s response will be the norm, I predict, in how Democratic elected officials respond to bond insanity no. 2.

Never forget that the overriding goal of the most powerful people in Sacramento — the teachers unions — is preserving the automatic raises that teachers get for 15 of their first 20 years on the job. Few if any California Democrats will stand up to the teachers unions. The few who do are demonized and marginalized.

The result: School districts using 30-year borrowing to pay for graffiti removal will be adjudged to be just fine. Gotta keep those automatic raises coming for teachers.

By Chris Reed

The use of 30-year school “construction” bonds to pay for routine maintenance and short-lived electronics like laptops is a huge, ongoing, but basically uncovered scandal in California. Since automatic annual pay raises for most teachers don’t get suspended when revenue is flat or declining, in many state school districts, California’s recent budget woes have lead to compensation eating up 90 percent or more of the operating budget.

So what do schools beholden to teachers unions do to cover costs that used to be in the operating budget? They make kids illegally pay for some school-related program, constantly pester parents with fundraising efforts and, oh yeah, use 30-year borrowing to pay for basic upkeep and electronics that aid in learning but last two years or less.

How does the state’s top educator feel about the latter practice? When I interviewed him, he all but said ho-hum.

“… state Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson expressed more sympathy for the irresponsible officials who engaged in it than for the taxpayers who are brutalized by it. He cited the ‘stress’ officials faced because of the state’s budget woes and implied it was understandable and reasonable for routine maintenance becoming a ‘capital improvement’ cost paid for with bonds.

“Torlakson declined to offer the slightest criticism of the folly that is 30-year borrowing to pay for products that will be broken in four years or less. His concession to appearances: ‘I’ve asked my staff on school construction to look into this and figure out where the line is on what’s eligible.'”

And now what does Torlakson want to do? Float a possibly unaccountable bond of his own, one in the megabillions.

No, it’s not a case of, “If you can’t beat ’em, join ’em.” Torlakson is all for the scams. It’s more like, “Hey, I want a piece of that action!”