<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>tunnel &#8211; CalWatchdog.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/tag/tunnel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 01:45:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">43098748</site>	<item>
		<title>Tunnel could boost high-speed rail cost</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/08/09/tunnel-could-boost-high-speed-rail-cost/</link>
					<comments>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/08/09/tunnel-could-boost-high-speed-rail-cost/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wayne Lusvardi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2014 19:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Breaking News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CHSRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-speed rail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tunnel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne Lusvardi]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=66642</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The cost of the high-speed rail project might be going above the current estimate of $68 billion. The California High-Speed Rail Authority recently announced a strategic shift to consider an alternative]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="alignright wp-image-66683" src="http://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/high-speed-rail-tunnel.png" alt="high-speed rail tunnel" width="300" height="325" srcset="https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/high-speed-rail-tunnel.png 615w, https://calwatchdog.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/high-speed-rail-tunnel-203x220.png 203w" sizes="(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px" />The cost of the high-speed rail project might be going above the current estimate of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_High-Speed_Rail" target="_blank" rel="noopener">$68 billion</a>.</p>
<p>The California High-Speed Rail Authority recently announced a <a href="http://www.latimes.com/local/countygovernment/la-me-bullet-strategy-shift-20140701-story.html#page=1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">strategic shif</a>t to consider an alternative for its 40-mile Palmdale-to-Burbank link. Instead of the current plan of running it parallel to the Palmdale Freeway, the new line would run through a <a href="http://www.dailybulletin.com/article/20140729/NEWS/140729373" target="_blank" rel="noopener">tunnel</a> under the San Gabriel Mountains.</p>
<p>According to Los Angeles County<a href="http://www.latimes.com/local/countygovernment/la-me-bullet-strategy-shift-20140701-story.html%23page=1#page=1" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> Supervisor Mike Antonovich</a>, who has advanced the idea, the tunnel would be about 15 miles long.</p>
<p>The CHSRA told CalWatchDog.com that it did not yet have estimates on the tunnels&#8217; cost.</p>
<p><a href="http://la.curbed.com/archives/2014/07/la_bullet_train_could_run_in_tunnel_under_the_san_gabriels.php" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Curbed L.A. reported</a>, &#8220;<span style="color: #000000;">The tunnel would go under the San Gabriel Mountains and shorten the travel time along the stretch, though it&#8217;s not yet known by how much. Also not known yet: how much more it&#8217;s going to cost. The new route, plus one that runs from Burbank to Union Station will be discussed at an upcoming series of </span><a style="color: #1111aa;" href="http://www.hsr.ca.gov/docs/events/2014_Palmdale_Burbank_LA_Meeting_Flyer_FINAL_072614.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">public scoping meetings</a><span style="color: #000000;"> over the first few weeks in August.&#8221;</span></p>
<h3>Tunnel costs</h3>
<p>But it&#8217;s possible to calculate a rough &#8212; very rough &#8212; estimate. Let&#8217;s start with something we know: the tunneling cost for the proposed extension of the Long Beach 710-Freeway: <a href="http://la.curbed.com/archives/2008/07/a_giant_black_h.php" target="_blank" rel="noopener">$6 billion</a> for a <a href="http://www.sgvtribune.com/opinion/20140127/raising-the-alarm-about-metros-proposed-710-freeway-twin-tunnels-guest-commentary" target="_blank" rel="noopener">4.9-mile segment</a>, which works out to $1.22 billion per mile.</p>
<p>As mentinoned, the San Gabriel Mountain tunnel link for high-speed rail would be 15 miles long. If it costs as much do dig that tunnel as the 710 freeway extension, that would be $1.22 billion per mile, or $18.3 billion total (15 miles X $1.22 billion per mile = $18.3 billion.)</p>
<p>Next, let&#8217;s return to the proposed high-speed rail land surface route, on which we have an official estimate. The proposal to run the 40-mile Palmdale-Burbank link on the land surface parallel to the Palmdale Freeway would cost $13.5 billion, or $337.5 million per mile, according to<a href="http://www.latimes.com/local/countygovernment/la-me-bullet-strategy-shift-20140701-story.html%23page=1#page=1" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> a June 30 report in the Los Angeles Times.</a></p>
<p>Now, let&#8217;s compare the two routes. The estimated $18.3 billion cost for the tunnel would be $4.8 billion, or 36 percent, more than the estimated cost of $13.5 billion for the land surface route.</p>
<p>That $4.8 billion extra cost also would increase the $68 billion cost of the entire system to $72.8 billion, a 7 percent increase.</p>
<p>Again, these are just rule-of-thumb estimates. We&#8217;ll have to wait until the CHSRA comes through with its won estimates of the cost of the potential tunnel to examine them more closely.</p>
<h3>Hearings</h3>
<p>According to the <a href="http://www.dailybulletin.com/article/20140729/NEWS/140729373" target="_blank" rel="noopener">San Gabriel Valley Tribune</a>, the following public meetings will allow citizens to ask about and discuss the proposed tunnel and other aspects of the project.</p>
<p>Meeting times are from <span class="aBn" tabindex="0" data-term="goog_1183852491"><span class="aQJ">5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m:</span></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Aug. 5, William S. Hart Regional Park, 24151 Newhall Ave., Newhall.</li>
<li>Aug. 6, Buena Vista Branch Library, 300 N. Buena Vista St., Burbank.</li>
<li>Aug. 7, Chimbole Cultural Center, 38350 Sierra Highway, Palmdale.</li>
<li><span class="aBn" tabindex="0" data-term="goog_1183852493"><span class="aQJ">Aug. 11</span></span>, Acton-Agua Dulce Library, 33792 Crown Valley Road, Acton.</li>
<li><span class="aBn" tabindex="0" data-term="goog_1183852494"><span class="aQJ">Aug. 12</span></span>, Sylmar Public Library, 14561 Polk St., Sylmar.</li>
<li><span class="aBn" tabindex="0" data-term="goog_1183852495"><span class="aQJ">Aug. 14</span></span>, Lake View Terrace Recreation Center, 11075 Foothill Blvd., Lake View Terrace.</li>
<li><span class="aBn" tabindex="0" data-term="goog_1183852496"><span class="aQJ">Aug. 19</span></span>, Los Angeles Union Station, Fred Harvey Room, 800 N. Alameda St. Los Angeles.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/08/09/tunnel-could-boost-high-speed-rail-cost/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">66642</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-14 11:40:47 by W3 Total Cache
-->