Comments on: Another court embarrassment for state AG Kamala Harris

By: RTR TRUTH MEDIA - Tom III% (@tomlacovara)

RTR TRUTH MEDIA - Tom III% (@tomlacovara) — Tue, 08 Sep 2020 13:50:36 +0000

In reply to Ted Steele, CEO. Name calling? It is not the gentleman above who is defying the Constitution. The SCOTUS - stocked with many Judicial activists over the years. Only a lawyer could read SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED, and think of a clever way to do so. I say we try them for treason.

By: California’s New AG Xavier Becerra is Hostile to Gun Rights, Due Process | Firearms Life

Sat, 03 Dec 2016 01:58:58 +0000

[…] Californians who may have been relieved that the election of Kamala Harris to the U.S. Senate represented a Dilbert Principle-style promotion of an incompetent to a position where she could not do as much damage, saw their relief slip away with Gov. Jerry Brown’s announcement that he was appointing Rep. Xavier Becerra as her replacement. […]

By: SkippingDog

SkippingDog — Mon, 03 Mar 2014 06:42:29 +0000

In reply to Ted Steele, CEO. Now batting 0 for 35.

By: Donkey

Donkey — Mon, 03 Mar 2014 01:39:15 +0000

In reply to Ted Steele, CEO. TCS, corrupt judges have perverted the words of the Constitution to the joy of statist commies like you. The 2nd Amendment is clear, only the RAGWUS LE feeder bureaucracy seeks to disarm the private citizen so they can continue to kill and abuse citizens with little fear of immediate reprisal. :)

By: ricky65

ricky65 — Sun, 02 Mar 2014 16:56:18 +0000

In reply to Ulysses Uhaul.

Naw, why even fool around with petty corrupt pols like Waxman or Harris.
Let’s just go with full blown total corruption right out in the open. Let the typical Dem voter see what they get by continuing to rubber stamp vote for Dema-Rat politicians.
Bring on the Calderon brothers! You can vote for them as as co-equal governors- a triumvirate or troika if you will. Three times the corruption for one low price!

By: Ted Steele, CEO

Ted Steele, CEO — Sun, 02 Mar 2014 04:19:50 +0000

In reply to Rex the Wonder Dog!.

LOL– another infamous Poodle Prediction ™ !

By: Ted Steele, CEO

Ted Steele, CEO — Sun, 02 Mar 2014 04:18:56 +0000

In reply to Donkey.

Yeah, you’re probably right “Duncey”.

I guess Article three does not give the Supreme Court the power to interpret the 2nd A.

You’re so brainy.

By: Rex the Wonder Dog!

Rex the Wonder Dog! — Sun, 02 Mar 2014 04:01:38 +0000

In reply to Donkey. TCS, learn to read my dimwitted pal. Stop picking on Teddy Steals Donk ;)

By: Rex the Wonder Dog!

Rex the Wonder Dog! — Sun, 02 Mar 2014 04:00:08 +0000

LOL..there is NO WAY the 9th will review it en banc and the SCOTUS won’t touch it w/ a 10 foot pole. Harris can petition al she wants, aint going to happen.

By: Donkey

Donkey — Sun, 02 Mar 2014 00:51:57 +0000

In reply to Donkey. TCS, learn to read my dimwitted pal. There were supposed to be no restrictions on the Bill of Rights, it is statist RAGWUS feeders like you that seek restrictions of the Rights of citizens, but none on the government!! :)