<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: High-speed rail lawsuit advances	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/13/high-speed-rail-lawsuit-advances/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/13/high-speed-rail-lawsuit-advances/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2014 18:59:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rex the Wonder Dog!		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/13/high-speed-rail-lawsuit-advances/#comment-73240</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rex the Wonder Dog!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 17:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=60368#comment-73240</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/13/high-speed-rail-lawsuit-advances/#comment-73082&quot;&gt;Queeg&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks Teddy....I mean &quot;Queeg&quot; :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/13/high-speed-rail-lawsuit-advances/#comment-73082">Queeg</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks Teddy&#8230;.I mean &#8220;Queeg&#8221; 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill - San Jose		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/13/high-speed-rail-lawsuit-advances/#comment-73192</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill - San Jose]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 04:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=60368#comment-73192</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An ex parte order should NEVER be granted in circumstances like this
An ex parte order should NEVER be granted in circumstances like this
An ex parte order should NEVER be granted in circumstances like this
An ex parte order should NEVER be granted in circumstances like this

X 1000.

Rex is right.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An ex parte order should NEVER be granted in circumstances like this<br />
An ex parte order should NEVER be granted in circumstances like this<br />
An ex parte order should NEVER be granted in circumstances like this<br />
An ex parte order should NEVER be granted in circumstances like this</p>
<p>X 1000.</p>
<p>Rex is right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Queeg		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/13/high-speed-rail-lawsuit-advances/#comment-73082</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Queeg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 05:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=60368#comment-73082</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Poodle you sound brilliant tonight......

Who would have known.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poodle you sound brilliant tonight&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Who would have known.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rex the Wonder Dog!		</title>
		<link>https://calwatchdog.com/2014/03/13/high-speed-rail-lawsuit-advances/#comment-73063</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rex the Wonder Dog!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 02:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calwatchdog.com/?p=60368#comment-73063</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An &lt;i&gt;ex parte&lt;/i&gt; order should NEVER be granted in circumstances like this, but the courts don&#039;t  follow the rules unless they want to, because the &quot;rules&quot; of procedure are not rules unless they support the judges position who are hearing the case, if they do NOT support the case they magically go from &quot;rules&quot; to &quot;suggested guidelines&quot;....sort of like the &quot;Pirates Code&quot; in the Johnny Depp movies...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An <i>ex parte</i> order should NEVER be granted in circumstances like this, but the courts don&#8217;t  follow the rules unless they want to, because the &#8220;rules&#8221; of procedure are not rules unless they support the judges position who are hearing the case, if they do NOT support the case they magically go from &#8220;rules&#8221; to &#8220;suggested guidelines&#8221;&#8230;.sort of like the &#8220;Pirates Code&#8221; in the Johnny Depp movies&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/


Served from: calwatchdog.com @ 2026-04-17 00:09:17 by W3 Total Cache
-->